Lib.Sci ter, C. ;ai Rules Jor u die Ed. 3. U. S. BUREAU OF EDUCATION SPECIAL REPORT ON PUBLIC LIBRARIES — PART IE FOB A DICTIONARY CATALOGUE BY CHARLES A. CUTTER ^ OF THE BOSTON THIRD EDITION WITH CORRECTIONS AND ADDITION'S AXD AX ALPHABETICAL INDEX WASHINGTON" GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1891 U. S. BUREAU OF EDUCATION SPECIAL REPORT ON PUBLIC LIBRARIES — PART II RULES FOR A DICTIONARY CATALOGUE BY CHARLES A. CUTTER OF THE BOSTON -A- THIRD EDITION WITH CORRECTIONS AND ADDITIONS AND AN ALPHABETICAL^ V APR 6 1937 >. , > N2>ii/r> Sf i WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1891 Entered, according to Act of Congress, in the year 1875, by CHARLES A. CUTTER, In the Office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington. PREFATORY NOTE. There are plenty of treatises on classification, of which accounts may be found iu Edwards's Memoirs of Libraries and Petzholdt's Bibliotheca Bibliographica. The classification of the St. Louis Public School Library Catalogue is briefly defended by W. T. Harris iu the preface (which is reprinted, with some additious, from the Journal of Speculative Phi- losophy for 1870). Professor Abbot's plan is explained in a pamphlet priuted and iu use at Harvard College Library, also iu his ''Statement respecting the New Catalogue" (part of the report of the examining committee of the library for 1863), and in the North American Review for January, 1869. The plan of Mr. Schwartz, librarian of the Appren- tices' Library, New York, is partially set forth in the preface to his cata- logue ; and a fuller explanation is preparing for publication. For an author-catalogue there are the famous 91 rules of the British Museum* (prefixed to the Catalogue of Printed Books, Vol. 1, 1841 , or conveniently arranged iu alphabetical order by Th. Nichols in his Handbook for Readers at the British Museum, 1866); Professor Jewett's modification of them (Smithsonian Report on the Construction of Catalogues, 1852); Mr. F. B. Perkins's further modification (in the American Publisher for 1. Titles 88 c. Contents 92 d. Subjects 93 Etc, (Sets, Rare books, etc.) 98 APPENDIX : i. A. L. A., L. A. U. K., Bodleian, Dewey'a Rules 99 n. A. L. A., Transliteration report 108 in. A. L. A., Book size report , , . . . 115 iv. Edmands on alphabeting 116 v. Abbreviations 119 vi. Other catalogues 126 VII. Bibliographical aids in cataloguing 128 5 [RULES FOR A DICTIONARY CATALOGUE. No code of cataloguing could be adopted iu all points by every one, because the libraries for study and the libraries for reading have dif- ferent objects, and those which combine the two do so in different pro- portions. Again, the preparation of a catalogue must vary as it is to be manuscript or printed, and, if the latter, as it is to be merely an index to the library, giving in the shortest possible compass clues by which the public can find books, or is to attempt to furnish more information on various points, or finally is to be made with a certain regard to what may be called style. Without pretending to exactness, we may divide dictionary catalogues into short-title, medium-title, and full-title or bib- liographic; typical examples of the three being, 1°, the Boston Mercan- tile (1869) or the Cincinnati Public (1871); 2°, the Boston Public (1801 and 1806), the Boston Athena3um (1874-82); 3°, the author-part of the Congress (1869) and the Surgeon-General's (1872-74) or least abridged of any, the present card catalogue of the Boston Public Library. To avoid the constant repetition of such phrases as "the full catalogue of a large library " and "a concise finding list," I shall use the three words Short, Medium, and Full as proper names, with the preliminary caution that the Short family are not all of the same size, that there is more than one Medium, and that Full may be Fuller and Fullest. Short, if single-columned, is generally a title-a-liuer; if printed in double col- umns, it allows the title occasionally to exceed one line, but not, if possible, two ; Medium does not limit itself in this way, but it seldom exceeds four lines, and gets many titles into a single line. Full usually fills three or four lines and often takes six or seven for a title. The number of the following rules is not owing to any complexity of system, but to the number of cases to which a few simple principles have to be applied. They are especially designed for Medium, but may easily be adapted to Short by excision and marginal notes. The almost uni- versal practice of printing the shelf-numbers or the class-numbers renders some of them unnecessary for town and city libraries. 7 8 OBJECTS. MEANS. REASONS. DEFINITIONS. OBJECTS.* 1. To enable a person to find a book of which either (A) the author^ (B) the title > is known. (c) the subject J 2. To show what the library has (D) by a given author (E) on a given subject (F) in a given kind of literature. 3. To assist in the choice of a book (G) as to its edition (bibliographically). (H) as to its character (literary or topical). MEANS. 1. Author-entry with the necessary references (for A and D). 2. Title-entry or title-reference (for B). 3. Subject-entry, cross-references, and classed subject- table (for o and E). 4. Form -entry t (for F). 5. Giving edition and imprint, with notes when necessary (for G). 6. Notes (for H). » EEASONS FOR CHOICE among the several possible methods of attaining the OBJECTS. Other things being equal, choose that entry (1) That will probably be first looked under by the class of people who use the library ; (2) That is consistent with other entries, so that one principle can cover all ; (3) That will mass entries least in places where it is difficult to so arrange them that they can be readily found, as under names of nations and cities. This applies very slightly to entries under first words, because it is easy and suffi- cient to arrange them by the alphabet. DEFINITIONS. There is such confusion in the use of terms in the various prefaces to catalogues — a confusion that at once springs from and leads to confusion of thought and practice — that it is worth while to propose a systematic nomenclature. Analysis. See Reference, Analytical. *Note to second edition. This statement of Objects and Means has been criticized ; but as it has also been frequently quoted, usually without change or credit, in the prefaces of catalogues and elsewhere, I suppose it has on the whole been approved. t Here the whole is designated by its most important member. The full name would be form-and- language entry. Kind-entry would not suggest the right idea. DEFINITIONS. 9 Anonymous, published without the author's name. Strictly a book is not anonymous if the author's name appears anywhere in it, but it is safest to treat it as anonymous if the author's name does not appear in the title. Note that the words are " in the title," not "on the title-page." Sometimes in Government publications the author's name and the title of his work do not appear on the title-page but on a page immediately following. Such works are not anony- mous. Asyndetic, without cross-references. See Syndetic. Author, in the narrower sense, is the person who writes a book; in a wider seuse it may be applied to him who is the cause of the book's ex- istence by putting together the writings of several authors (usually called the editor, more properly to be called the collector). Bodies of men (societies, cities, legislative bodies, countries) are to be con- sidered the authors of their memoirs, transactions, journals, debates, reports, etc. Class, a collection of objects having characteristics in common. Books are classified by bringing together those which have the same characteristics.* Of course any characteristics might be taken, as size, or binding, or publisher. But as nobody wants to know what books there are in the library in folio, or what quartos, or what books bound in russia or calf, or what published by John Smith, or by Brown, Jones, and Robinson, these bases of classification are left to the booksellers and auc- tioneers and trade sales. Still, in case of certain unusual or noted bindings, as human skin or Grolier's, or early or famous publishers, as Aldus and Elzevir, a partial class-list is sometimes very properly made. But books are most commonly brought together in catalogues because they have the same authors, or the same subjects, or the same lit- erary form, or are written in the same language, or were given by the same donor, or are designed for the same class of readers. Wh3n brought together because they are by the same author, they are not usually thought of as classified; they form the author- catalogue, and need no further mention here except in regard to arrangement. The classes, i. e., in this case the authors, might of course be further classified according to their nations, or their professions (as the subjects are in national or professional biographies), or by any other set of common characteristics, but for library purposes an alphabetical arrangement according to the spelling of their names is universally acknowledged to be the best. The classification by language is not generally used in full. There are catalogues in which all the English books are separated from all the foreign; in others there are separate lists of French books or German books. The needs of each library must de- termine whether it is worth while to prepare such lists. It is undeniably useful in almost any library to make lists of the belles lettres in the different languages ; which, though nominally a classification by language, is really a classification by literary form, the object being to bring together all the works with a certain national flavor — the French flavor, the German flavor, or it may be a classing by readers, the German books being catalogued together for a German population, the French for the French, and so on. Again, it is useful to give lists not of the belles lettres alone, but of all the works in the rarer languages, as the Bodleian and the British Museum have published separate lists of their Hebrew books. Here too the circumstances of each library must determine where it shall draw the line between those literatures which it will put by themselves and those which it will include and hide in the mass of its general catalogue. Note, however, that some of the difficulties of transliterating * This note has little direct bearing on practice, but by its insertion here some one interested in the theory of cataloguing may be saved the trouble of going over the same ground. 10 DEFINITIONS. names of modern Greek, Russian authors, etc., are removed by putting their original works in a separate catalogue, though translations still remain to puzzle us. The catalogue by donors or original owners is usually partial (as those of the Dowse* Barton, Prince, and Ticknor libraries). The catalogues by classes of readers are also partial, hardly extending beyond Juvenile literature and Sunday-school books- Of course many subject classes amount to the same thing, the class Medicine beiug especially useful to medical men, Theology to the theologians, and so on. Classification by subject and classification by form are the most common. An ex- ample will best show the distinction between them. Theology, which is itself a sub- ject, is also a class, that is, it is extensive enough to have its parts, its chapters, so to speak (as Future Life, Holy Spirit, Regeneration, Sin, Trinity), treated sepa- rately, each when so treated (whether in books or only in thought) beiug itself a sub- ject; all these together, inasmuch as they possess this in common, that they have to do with some part of the relations of God to mau, form the class of subjects Theology. Class, however, is applied to Poetry in a different sense. It then signifies not a col- lection of similar subjects, but a collection of books resembling one another in being composed in that form and with that spirit, whatever it is, which is called poetical. In the subject-catalogue class it is used in the first sense — collection of similar sub- jects; iu the form-catalogue it is used in the second — list of similar books. Most systems of classification are mixed, as the following analysis of one in actual use iu a small library will show: Art, science, and natural history. Subj. History and biography. Subj. Poetry. Form (literary). Encyclopaedias and books of refer- Form (practical), ence. Travels and adventures. Subj. (Has some similarity to a Form-class.) Railroads. Subj. Fiction. Form. (Novels, a subdivision of Fiction, is properly a Form-class; but the differentia of the more extensive class Fiction is not its form, but its untruth; imaginary voyages and the like of course imitate the form of the works which they parody.) Relating to the rebellion. Subj. Magazines. Form (practical). General literature, essays, and re- A mixture: 1. Hardly a class; that is to eaj , it probably is a collec- ligious works. tion of books having only this in common, that they will not fit into any of the other classes ; 2. Form; 3. Subj. Confining ourselves now to classification by subjects, the word can be used in three senses : 1. Bringing books together which treat of the same subject specifically. That is, books which -each treat of the whole of the subject and not of apart only. 2. Bringing books together which treat of similar subjects. Or, to express the same thing differently: Bringing subjects together so as to form a class. A catalogue so made is called a classed catalogue. 3. Bringing classes together so as to form a system. A catalogue so made should be called a systematic catalogue. The three steps are then 1. Classifying the books to make subject-lists. 2. Classifying the subject-lists to make classes. 3. Classifying the classes to make a systematic catalogue. The dictionary stops in its entries at the first stage, in its cross-references at the second. The alphabetico-classed catalogue stops at the second stage. The systematic alone advances to the third. Classification in the first sense, it is plain, is the same as "entry;" in the second DEFINITIONS. 11 sense it is the same as "class-entry;" and in the third sense it is the same as the "logical arrangement" of the table on p. 12, under " Classed catalogue." It is worth while to ascertain the relation of subject and class in the subject-cata- logue. Subject is the matter on which the author is seeking to give or the reader to obtain information; Class is, as said above, a grouping of subjects which have char- acteristics in common. A little reflection will show that the words so used partially overlap,* the general subjects being classes t and the classes being subjects, t but the individual subjects § never being classes. Class entry, registering a book under the name of its class ; in the sub- ject-catalogue used in contradistinction to specific entry. E. av av e ev 1 iv O3 y 18 . y y before K ) dh K after y f x ew u p r A: kh When Hindus themselves transliterate their names, use their form, whether or not according to our rules. (Appendix n.) In Hungarian names write 6, ii, with the diieresis (not oe, ue), and arrange like the English o, u. In Spanish names use the modern orthography i and j rather than the ancient y and x. In Swedish names a, a, 6, should be so written (not ae, oe), and arranged as the English a, o. Ballhorn's Grammatography (London, 1861) will be found very useful on such points. CORPORATE ENTRY. 27 37. When an author living in a foreign country has transliterated his name according to the practice of that country and always uses it in that form, take that as the heading, referring from the form which the name would have under §36; but if he has written much in his own language, use the English transliterated form. Ex. Bikelas, Demetrius, with reference from Vikelas, Dmitri. 38. If a name which would properly be spelled by the English alphabet has been transliterated into a foreign alphabet, refer from the foreign form. Ex. Sifner. See Schiefner. 2. CORPORATE. General principle. 39. Bodies of men are to be considered as authors of works published in their name or by their authority. The chief difficulty with regard to bodies of men is to determine (1) what their names are, and (2) whether the name or some other word shall be the heading. In re- gard to (2) the catalogues hitherto published may be regarded as a series of experi- ments. iSo satisfactory usage has as yet been established. Local names have always very strong claims to be headings ; but to enter the publications of all bodies of men under the places with which the bodies are connected is to push a convenient prac- tice so far that it becomes inconvenient and leads to many rules entirely out of har- mony with the rest of the catalogue. Details. 40. Enter under places (countries, or parts of countries, cities, towns, ecclesiastical, military, or judicial districts) the works published officially by their rulers (kings,1 governors, mayors, prelates, generals commanding, courts,2 etc.). Refer from the name of the ruler. 'Of course this does not affect works written privately by kings, etc., as K. James's "Counterblast." *The relation of courts to judicial districts is a little different from the others, but it is convenient to treat them alike. The opinion of a single judge should be entered under his name. Ex. UNITED STATES. Supreme Court. Opinions of the judges in the case of Smith vs. Turner, etc. TAXEY, Roger Brooke. Decision in the Merryman case. 41. Similarly Congress, Parliament, and other governmental bodies are authors of their journals, acts, minutes, laws, etc. ; and other de- partments of government of their reports, and of the works pub- lished by them or under their auspices, These are to be entered under the name of the country, city, or town, and not in the main alphabet under the word Congress, Parliament, City Council, or the like. 42. Laws on one or more particular subjects, whether digested or merely collected, must have author entries both under the name of the country and under the name of the collector or digester. Ex. Tilsley's ' Digest of the stamp acts " would appear both under Great Britain and Tilsley. 28 AUTHORS: CORPORATE ENTRY. 43. Calendars of documents, regesta, etc., are to be entered under their maker, with a series-entry under the department which orders the publication. Ex. Green, Mrs. M.. Anne Everett (Wood). Calendar of state papers, domestic, Cbarles u. The series-entry is under Great Britain. Master of the Bolls. 44. Works written officially are to be entered under the name of the department of government or society (see § 56) or ecclesiastical district with a reference from the name of the official, if it is thought worth making. Some libraries may refer always; most will refer only when the report has excep- tional importance (1) from its subject, (2) from the treatment of its subject, (3) from its literary merits, (4) from the fame of its author, or (5) from having been separately published. Horace Mann's reports, for example, should be catalogued under Massa- chusetts. Board of Education, to which heading a reference should be made from Mann. Presidents' messages should appear under United States. President. Proclamations and all other official writings of kings should appear under the name of the country (division King or Crown), arranged by reigns, as, Great Britain. Crown. Charles I. Charles n. James n. William and Mary. United States. President. Buchanan. Lincoln. Johnson. Grant. 45. In the entry of Government publications, use for a subdivision the name of the office rather than the title of the officer, i. e., Minis- tere de la Marine, not Ministre de la Marine, Registry of Deeds, not Register of Deeds.1 The individual name of the occupant of the office for the time being may be added in parenthesis to the name of the office;2 and it should be so added when the publica- tion has an individual character. 1 There are cases, however, where the title of the officer is the only name of the office, as Illinois. State Entomologist. 2 Great Britain. Croicn, 1377-9y (Richard n). A roll. etc. 46. Messages of a superior executive officer (as President or Governor) transmitting to a legislative body or to some higher executive officer the report of some inferior officer should be entered as the report of the inferior officer, provided the message is merely in- troductory and contains no independent matter ; provided, also, there are not three or more reports; if there are, the higher offi- cer is to be regarded as the collecting-editor (§ 59, d); in this case refer analytically to the superior officer's official title from all the inferior officers whose reports are so transmitted. 47. "Articles to be inquired of" in ecclesiastical districts should go under the name of the district; but episcopal charges are not to go under the name of the bishopric unless they relate especially to its affairs, in which case they will have a subject-entry. Ex. York, Archdeaconry of. Articles to be enquired of within the A. of Y. CORPORATE ENTRY. 29 48. Eeports made to a department, but not by an official, are to be en- tered under the department, with either an entry, reference, or analytical under the author as circumstances require. Gould's " Molltisca and shells" and Cassin's " Mammalogy and ornithology of the United States Exploring Expedition under Wilkes" are of this nature; si- is " Me- morial ceremonies at the graves of our soldiers, collected under authority of Congress, by Frank Moore." (Compare § 43.) 49. Enter congresses of several nations under the name of the place of meeting (as that usually gives them their name), with references from the nations taking part in them and from any name by which they are popularly known. Ex. The Congress of London, of Paris, of Verona. 50. Enter treaties under the name of each of the contracting parties, with a reference from the name of the place, when the treaty is commonly called by that name, and from any other usual appel- lation. Ex. Treaty of Versailles, Barrier treaty, Jay's treaty. 51. Enter the official publications of any political party1 or religious denomination or order,2 or military order, under the name of the party, or denomination, or order.3 1 Platforms, manifestoes, addresses, etc., under Democratic Party, Republican Party, etc. 2 Confessions of faith, creeds, catechisms, liturgies, breviaries, missals, hours, offices, prayer books, etc., under Baptists, Benedictines, Catholic Church, Church of England, etc. 3 That part of a body which belongs to any place should be entered under the name of the body, not the place; e. g., Congregationalists in New England, Congrega- tionalists in Massachusetts, not New England Congregationalists, Massachu- setts Congregationalists. But references must be made from the place (indeed in cases like Massachusetts Convention, Essex Conference, it may be doubted whether those well-known names should not be the headings). It is to be noticed this rule is just the reverse of the one given under Subjects, § 97. Single churches have usu- ally been entered under the place, a practice which arose in American catalogues from our way of naming churches 'The First Church in ," " The Second Church in ," etc., and applies very well to a majority of English churches, whose name generally includes the name of the parish. It is more in accordance with dictionary principles to limit the local entry of churches to First Church, etc., and those which have only the name of the town or parish, and to put all others (as St. Sepulchre's, St. Mary Aldermansbury) under their names, as they read, and to treat convents and monasteries in the same way. (See § 56, Role 2.) Of course the parishes of Lon- don (as Kensington, Maryleboue, Southwark),like the parts of Boston (Dorchester, Roxbnry, etc.), or of any other composite city, will be put under their own names, not under the name of the city. 52. Enter reports, journals, minutes, etc., of conventions, conferences, etc., under the names of the bodies holding the conferences, etc. When the body has no exact name1 enter under the name of the place of meeting.2 1 Some conventions are held by bodies which have no existence beyond the conven- tion. If, however, they have a definite name, use that ; ex., 4th National Quarantine 30 AUTHORS: CORPORATE ENTRY. and Sanitary Convention. Ofteu the name is given in different forms. Select that which appears to be the most authentic, and make references from the others. 8 In any case it is well to refer from the name of the place, and in the case of Presi- dential conventions it is indispensable. Put the convention of a county or other named district under the name of the dis- trict, with a reference from the town in which it is held, when it is named in the title-page. 53. Enter ecclesiastical councils, both general and special, under tlie name of the place of meeting. (The Vatican Council under Vatican, not Rome.) Eefer from the name of the ecclesiastical body. 54. Enter reports of committees under the name of the body to which they belong; but reports of " a committee of citizens," etc., not belonging to any named body should be put under the name of the writer, if known, if not, of the chairman, or if that is not given, of the first signer, or if not signed, under the name of the place. 55. Put the anonymous publications of any class (not organized) of citizens of a place under the place. Ex. "Application to Parliament by the merchants of London" should go under London. Merchants. 56. Societies are authors of their journals, memoirs, proceedings, trans- actions, publications. (On publishing-societies, see B. Substi- tutes, § 59, e.) The,chief practices in regard to societies have been to enter them (1. British Mu- seum) under a special heading — Academies — with a geographical arrangement; (2. Boston Public Library, printed catalogue) under the name of the place where they have their headquarters; (3. Harvard College Library and Bost. Pub. Lib., present system) under, the name of the place, if it enters into the legal name of the society, other- wise under the first word of that name not an article; (4. Boston Athenaeum) English societies under the first word of the society's name not an article, foreign societies under the name of the place. Both 3 and 4 put under the place all purely local societies, those whose membership or objects are confined to the place. The 1st does not deserve a moment's consideration ; such a heading is out of place in an author- catalogue, and the geographical arrangement only serves to complicate matters and render it more difficult to find any particular academy." The 2d is utterly unsuited to American and English societies. The 3d practice is simple • but it is difficult to see the advantage of the exception which it makes to its general rule of entry under the society's name; the exception does not help the cataloguer, for it is just as hard to determine whether the place enters into the legal name as it is to ascertain the name ; it does not help the reader, for he has no means of knowing whether the place is part of the legal name or not. The 4th is simple and intelligible ; it is usually easy for both cataloguer and reader to determine whether a society is English or for- eign. I shall mention two other possible plans, well aware that there are strong objections to both. 5TH PLAN. Rule 1. Enter academies,t associations, institutes, universities, socie- ties, libraries, galleries, museums, colleges, and all similar bodies, and churches that * They are now arranged under Academies in a single alphabet of places, so that the latter — the most serious — objection does not apply. t That is learned academies like the French Academy, not high schools. CORPORATE ENTRY. 31 have an individual name, both English and foreign, according to their corporate name, neglecting an initial article when there is one. Exception 1. Enter the universities and the royal academies of Berlin, Gottingen, Leipzig, Lisbon, Madrid, Munich, St. Petersburg, Vienna, etc., and the "Institut" of Paris, under those cities. An exception is an evil. This one is adopted because the universities and academies are almost universally known by the names of the cities, and are hardly ever referred to by the name Kouigliche, Real, etc. Exception 2. Enter London guilds under the name of the trade; e. g., "Stationers' Company," not " Master and Keepers or Wardens and Commonalty of the Mystery and Art of Stationers of the City of London," which is the corporate title. This exception is adopted because (1) it gives a heading easier to find, and ('2) it would be difficult in many cases to ascertain the real names of the London companies. Exception 3. Enter bodies whose legal name begins with such words as Board, Corporation, Trustees nuder that part of the name by which they are usually known. E. g. Trustees of the Eastern Dispensary. Corporation of the Chamber of Com- merce in the City of New York. Proprietors of the Boston Athenaeum. Con- tributors to the Asylum for the Relief of Persons deprived of their Reason. Refer from the first word of the legal name. Exception 4. Enter orders of knighthood under the significant word of the English title; as, Garter, Order of the ; Malta, Knights of; Templars, Knights; Teutonic Order. Exception 5. Enter American State historical and agricultural societies under the name of the State. Rule 2. a. Enter churches which have no individual name and all purely local be- nevolent or moral or similar societies under the name of the place. b. Young men's Christian associations, mercantile library associations, and the like are to be considered local. c. .Business firms or corporations (except national banks numbered as First Na- tional Bank, etc.), libraries, galleries, museums, are not to be considered local, nor are private schools local, but go under their corporate name, or, if they are not corporate, under the name of the proprietor. d. National libraries museums, and galleries and libraries, museums, and galleries instituted or supported by a city go under the name of^the city provided they have not a name of their own. (E. g., the Boston Public Library goes under Boston ; but the Reuben Hoar Library of Littleton goes under Hoar.) American public schools should in any case go under the name of the city. (Rule 2, A.) e. If college societies limited to one college are considered local, they would be entered not under the name of the place but of the college ; if they are treated by rule 1, as all general college societies must be, reference (6) must be made. College libraries go under the name of the college. The colleges of an English university and the schools of an American university go under the name of the university. Refer (1) from all the varying forms of the society's name. (2) from important words in the society's name, when the first word is unlikely to be thought of. (3) from the name of the city where the society is situated. (4) from the motto in the names of Dutch societies. (5) from the names of the royal societies of Berlin, etc. (G) from colleges to college societies. (7) from such words as Gallery, Museum, etc., to all the galleries, museums, etc., contained in the catalogue. 32 AUTHORS: CORPORATE ENTRY. /Universities, galleries, etc., called merely Imperial, Royal, National and the like are riot to be considered as having individual names, except the National Gallery of London. g Buildings are for the most part provided for in the above rules as museums, galle- ries, libraries, churches, etc. Any others should be entered under their names, with a reference from the city. hit' a firm's name is in the form Raphael Friedlander und Sohn it might be put as it reads, i. e.t under R, or reversed, i. e., Friedlander und Sohn, Raphael. I prefer the latter, because the cousulter is much more likely to remember the family than the Christian name. Whether the Christaiu name is written at the end or thus, Town (John) and Bowers (Henry), all firms should be arranged after all the other entries of the first family name, i. e., Friedlander und Sohn after all the Fried- landers. The same reason applies to other bodies whose legal name begins with a forename. The plan might be tabulated thus : Under name. Churches not numbered and not named from the place. Societies not local. English and American academies. Colleges, universities, libraries, galleries, museums, having an individual name. Private schools. Business firms and corporations. London guilds (name of trade). Under place. Churches numbered or otherwise named from the place. Societies purely local. Academies and universities of the Euro- pean Continent and of South America. National or municipal colleges, libraries, galleries, museums, not having an in- dividual name. Public schools. Municipal corporations. State historical societies and State agri- cultural societies (name of state). Ex. Amiens. Academic des Sciences, Agriculture, Commerce, Belles-Let- tres, et Arts du Department de la Somme. (Rule 1, exc. 1.) Association Scientifique Algerienue, Algiers. (Rule 1.) Athenee de Vaucluse, Avignon. (Rule 1.) Barbers and Surgeons of London (Mystery and Commonalty of), after- wards Royal College of Surgeons. See Royal College of Surgeons. Boston (Mass.) Public Library. (Rule 2, d.~) Boston. Wells School. (Rule 2, d.) Boston Athenaeum. (Rule 1, exc. 3, Rule 2, c.) Boston, First Church of. (Rule 2, d.) British Museum. (Rule 2, d.) Cambridge (Mass.), First Church of. (Rule 2.) Chauncy Hall School, Boston, Mass. (Rule 2 c.) Chemins de Fer de Paris a Ly on et a la Mediterranee, Comp. des. ( Rule 2, c. ) Christiania. Videnskabs-Selskab. (Rule 1, exc. 1.) Clarke (W. B.), & Co. (Rule 2, c.) Congres International des Americanistes. (Rule 1.) Firenze. Galleria Imperiale. (Rule 2, /.) Freemasons in Iowa. (§ 513.) Genootschap "Oefening kweekt Kunst," Amsterdam. (Rule 1, and ref. 4.) Geschichts- und Alterthumsforschende Gesellschaft des Osterlandes, Altenburg. (Rule 1.) Gottingen. K. Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften. (Rule 1, exc. 1.) Great Britain. Parliament. (§ 41.) Harvard College. (Rule 1.) Harvard College. Lawrence Scientific School. (Rule 1, 2, e.) Harvard College. Library. (Rule 1, 2, e.) SUBSTITUTES. 33 Hermitage, Gallerie de 1', St. Petersburg. (Rule 2,d.) Houghton & Mifflin. (Rule 2, c.) L'Internationale. (Rule 1.) Intime Club, Paris. (Rule 1.) London. Merchants. (§ 55.) Louvre, Gallerie du, Paris. (Rule 2, d. ) Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, Mass. (Rule 2, c.) Madrid. R. Academia de la Historia. (Rule 1, exc. 1.) National Gallery, London. (Rule 2, /.) 3d National Quarantine and Sanitary Convention. (§ 521.) New England Trust Co., Boston, Mass. (Rule 2, c.) New York. Chamber of Commerce. (Rule 1, exc. 3, Rule 2, c.) New York. First National Bank. (Rule 2, c.) New York. Young Men's Christian Association. (Rule 2, 6.) Or San Michele, Chiesa di, Florence. (Rule 1.) Paris. Bibliotheque Nationale. (Rule 2, d, /.) 4>BK. A of Harvard. (Rule 2, e.) Prado, Museo del, Madrid. (Rule 2, d.) Pratt (Enoch) Free Library, Bait., MA. (Rule 2, d, h.) San Francisco. Mercantile Library Assoc. (Rule 2, 6.) Societe de 1' Agriculture de 1'Orne, Alenpon. (Rule 1.) Stationers' Company, London. (Rule 1, exc. 2.) Templars, Knights. (Rule 2, exc. 4.) Tubingen. Eberhard-Karls Universitat. (Rule 1, exc. 1.) L'Union Generate, Paris. (Rule 2, c.) United States. Library of Congress. ($ 40.) Vatican Council. (§ 53.) Verona, Congress of. (§49.) Versailles, Treaty of. See . ($50.) Wisconsin, State Historical Society of. (Rale 1, exc. 5.) The GTH PLAN has the same rules as the STH, aud no exceptions. It may be preferred by those who think the advantage of having a single uniform rule greater than the inconvenience of unusual headings. Perhaps from habit I prefer the 4xn PLAN. Of the other plans experience confirms me in the belief that the STH PLAN is the best. The A. L. A. adopted the GTH PLAN. I have used it ever since iu the Library journal, and I do not think it works well. B. SUBSTITUTES. Substitutes for the author's name (to be chosen in the following order) are — 57. Part of the author's name when only a part is known. Ex. For abook " by J. B. Far . . .," or " by L. M. P.," or " by Ddg.," or " by — Isd— ,» the entry is to be made under Far .. ., J. B., P., L. M., Ddg., — Isd — . If the last initials are evidently, from the style of printing, those of a title, the entry will be under the initial preceding them; thus for books "by B. F., D.D.," or "by M. P. R., Gent.," or " by X. Y. Z., D.D.," the entry is to be made under F., B., D.D., and R., M. P., Gent., and Z., X. Y., D.D. In such case it is safest to have also a reference from the last initial to the one chosen, as D., X. Y. Z. D. See Z., X. Y., D.D. It is often well to make a reference from the first word (title-reference). This mode of entry ensures the easy finding of a particular book and brings together all of an author's works in which the same letters are used, and sometimes leads to the discov- ery of a real name. Even mere printer's marks, as *** or . . . , or ! ! ! , unaccompanied by any letters, though they can not be considered as names, may be used as headings for a reference 4892 LI 3 34 AUTHORS : SUBSTITUTES. for the sake of bringing together all the works of an author using them; but each work should also have title entry if anonymous. 58. A pseudonym, that is, a false name j as, John Phenix, Mark Twain. If the author's real name is known, make the entry under that, with a reference from the pseudonym; but if the writer is much better known by the pseudonym, enter under that, with a reference from the real name. (See note under §6.) A phrase — "One who loves his country," "A friend to peace"— or even a shorter appellation — "A lawyer" — is not a name. References might be made from these to the word under which the book is entered, but they would swell the catalogue and rarely be of use. Appellatives beginning with the definite article, like "The Prig," "The Old Shekarry," "The Duchess," are not vague like "A lover of justice," and when constantly used should be treated as names in the way either of entry or reference. Latin phrases, like "Amator patriae," should be treated as names and the entry made under the last word ; as, Fatriae, Amator. But it should not be made under patro- nymic adjectives, or certain words like junior, senior, evidently intended to qualify the name, not to be taken as the name ; i. e., the heading for a book " by Phileleu- therus Lipsiensis" would not be Lipsiensis, Phileleutherus, but Phileleutherus Lipsiensis; Vanity Fair Album by Jehu Junior would go under Jehu junior, not Junior, Jehu. In such cases a reference from the word which is not taken as the heading will be an additional safeguard. Pseudonyms like Aunt Jane, Cousin Mary, Uncle John, should be entered under the second word, although it is evidently not a family name but a forename; it is all the name that we have. The word Anonymus may be considered as a pseudonym when used as follows : "Auonymi iutroductio in," etc. A foreign article beginning a pseudonym used in an English work is considered as a part of the name ; as, El-Mukattem, pseud. 59. Collector. That is, the one who is responsible for the existence of a collection. A collection is made by putting together, with a collective title, three or more works by different authors, so as to make one work. Examples: Johnson's "Little classics," Buchon's " Collection des rne"inoires." a. This rule does not apply to the collector (editor) of a periodical. (§ 73.) b. Several works published together without a collective title are to be put under that author's name which appears first on the title- page, even though the collector's name is also there ; in other words, he is then to be considered merely as the editor. (See § 4.) Thus, "The fraternitye of vacabondes, by J. Awdeley; A caueat for common curse- tors, by T. Harman ; A sermon in praise of thieves, by Parson Haben or Hyberdyne ; those parts of The groundworke of conny-catching that differ from Harman's Caueat : ed. by E. Viles and F. J. Furnivall," should be eutered not under Viles, E., and Pur- nivall, F. J., but under Awdeley; but if it had been entitled " Early tracts on vag- abonds and beggars; edited by E. Viles and F. J. Furnivall," it would properly be put under the editors. c. If the collector's name is known, the collection is to be put under it, whether it occurs on the title-page or not. If his name is not known, enter the collection like any anonymous work, under the first word of the collective title. In either case the separate works forming the collection must be entered under their respect- ive authors. (See V. Analysis.) Title-references are also often necessary. (See II,. Titles.) SUBSTITUTES. REFERENCES. 35 d. A collection kuowu chiefly by its title may be put under that as well as under the collector. The older collections, like Graevius's Thesaurus autiquitatuin Rornanarum, Grono- vius's Thesaurus Graecaruui antiquitatuin, are known and referred to by their col- lectors' names but of late years a swarm of series 'American statesmen series, etc.) has arisen which are known wholly by their titles, under which they should be en- tered in full, with contents, to save the time of the searcher. The entry under the editor is necessary because he is really the author of the series, but it may be brief, with a reference for the " Contents" to the title-entry. e. Societies like theCamdeu, Chethaui, Hakluyt are collectors of the series of works published by them, of which a list should be given under their names. But every such work filling one or more volumes should be entered separately under its author or title as if it were published independently, and should have the same subject-entry. (See § 125.) Works that fill part of a volume are to be entered analyt- ically, (See § 126.) Of course any volume consisting of three or more treatises, put together with a collective title by the society, should be entered under it as col- lector, if no collector's name is given. For anonymous works, see Title-entry, § 68. For trials, see § 64. o. KEFERENCES. 60. Make references (§ 3.) From joint authors (after the first) to the first. (§ 5.) From the pneses to the respondent or defendant of a thesis, or vice versa. (§ 6.) From pseudonyms, initials, and part of names. (§§ 7, 8.) From important illustrators when not important enough for x an entry. (§ 12.) From commentators who are not entitled to an entry, if the commentary preponderates or for any reason is likely to be looked for under the commentator's name. Where the line of omission shall be drawn depends on the fullness of the cata- logue. (§§ 13-16.) From the authors of continuations, indexes, and of intro- ductions of some length, also in some cases, of epitomes, re- visions, and excerpts. (§ 18.) From the names of reporters, translators, and editors of anon- ymous works and of works not anonymous which are commonly known by the name of their editors or translators. Ex. Some translations from the German by Mrs. Wister are wrongly lettered aa if she were the author, and are therefore asked for by her name. (§ 19 a.) From the foreign form of names of sovereigns, whenever they are likely to be looked for under that form. (§ 19 &, c.) From the family name of persons canonized, and of friars who drop the family name on entering their order. (§ 19 e.) From such parts of Oriental names as require it. (§ 20.) From the names of English sees and deaneries. 36 AUTHORS: REFERENCES. (§ 20 c.) From the maiden names or unused married names of wives to the one used in the catalogue, provided they have written under the earlier names or for any other reason are likely to be looked for under them. (§ 21.) From the family names of British noblemen to the titles, or vice versa, if the entry is made under the family name. From the family names of foreign noblemen, when they are known by them wholly or in part. From any other title by which a man may be better known than by his real name. As, "Claimant, The.'' The Diary of the Shah of Persia, catalogued under Nassr- ad-Din, requires a reference from Shah. (§22.) From the earlier forms of names that are changed. (§ 23.) From the part of compound names which is not used for entry to the part which is, whenever it seems necessary. (§ 24.) From the prefixes of foreign names when they have been com- monly used in combination with the last part. Ex. From Vandyck to Dyck, A. van, from Degerando to Gerando, and De Can- dolle to Candolle. (§ 25.) From the alternative part of Latin names. (§5 27-38.) From all forms of a name varying either by spelling, trans- .lation, or transliteration that do not come into immediate jux- taposition with the one chosen. This should be done whether the rejected form occurs in the title of a book in the library or not. The object of a reference is to enable the reader to find the works of ai> author, not merely a particular book, and the reader may have seen the author re- fo» red to under the rejected form whether the library has a book with that form or not. (§§ 40, 44, 48.) From the authors of official writings (with discretion). (§ 49.) From nations taking part in a congress to the place of meeting. (§ 52.) From the places where conventions are held to the names of the bodies holding them. (§ 53.) From the name of an ecclesiastical body to the headings under which the councils of the body are entered. (§ 56.) A list of references is given in the note. (§ 57.) From part of the author's name appearing on the title-page to the whole name if discovered. From the last initial given on a title-page to the one chosen for the entry. (§58.) From a pseudonym to the real name when discovered. From some phraseological pseudonyms, especially if brief. Ex. From Lawyer, when an anonymous work is said to be "by a lawyer." For Full only. From editors and translators. If it is thought worth while to give a complete view of the literary and artistic activity of every author so far as it is represented in the library, of course references from editors, translators, illustrators, cartographers, engravers, etc., must be made. But this completeness is not usually sought even in large libraries. Such references REFERENCES. ECONOMIES. 37 are also undeniably a help in finding books. But they increase the bulk and the cost of a catalogue so much and are comparatively of so little use that ordinary libraries must content themselves with a selection, though the best-made selection is certain to occasion complaints that the really useful ones have been omitted and the least important made. The chief classes of necessary references of this sort are — (1.) From the editors of periodicals to the title-entry, when the periodical is com- monly called by the editor's name, as PoggendorfFs Annaleu, Silliman's JournaL (2.) From the names of editors and translators which are habitually mentioned in connection with a work, so that it is as likely to be looked for under the editor's name as under the author's name. When the form is a combination of author's aud editor's name, as Heyne's Virgil, Leverett's Cicero, the reference, though convenient, is cer- tainly not necessary, inasmuch as a person of ordinary intelligence could hardly fail, not finding what he wanted under one name, to try the other. (3. ) From the names of those who have made poetical versions, on the ground that their work is something more than mere translation. (4.) From the translators of anonymous works, because the title of the original will generally be unknown to the searcher. This is less necessary for famous works ; thus J. Scott's version of the Arabian Nights would probably be looked for under Arabian nights rather than under Scott ; but it makes assurance doubly sure. (5.) From the names of translators, editors, etc., of Oriental works, because Occi- dental readers are much more likely to remember these names than those of the authors. It may be thought that an excessive number of references is recommended, but it is plain that wherever there can be a reasonable doubt among cataloguers under what head a book ought to be entered, it should have at least a reference under each head. The object of an author-catalogue is to enable one to find the book ; if that object is not attained the book might as well not be catalogued at all. 61. Make explanatory notes under such words as Congress, Parliament, Academies, Societies, and others in regard to whose entry there is a diverse usage, stating what is the rule of the catalogue. D. ECONOMIES. 62. In the title-a-liners references are not an economy ; they occupy as much room as an entry, and therefore the imprint may as well be given whenever the reference does not take the place of sev- eral titles. 63. Mr. Perkins would catalogue directories, state registers, and local gazetteers under the name of the place, omitting the author- entry This is for Short alone, and should never be done by Full or Medium. 64. Trials of crown, state, and criminal cases may be entered only under the name of the defendant, and trials of civil cases uuder the parties to the suit, treated like joint authors, and trials relating to vesssels uuder the name of the vessel (subject-entries of course). Bat Full and perhaps Medium should make author-entries under the reporter. It may be doubted, however, whether a steno- graphic reporter is entitled to be considered an author any more than a type-setter. Collected reports of trials will of course (§ 59) go under the collector: for subject- entry they come under the place over which the court has jurisdiction, and if they relate to a single crime (as murder), under that also. 38 TITLE-ENTRY. 65. Often in analysis it may be worth while to make a subject-entry and not an author-entry, or vice versa. 66. An economical device in some favor is to omit the entry under the author's name when the library contains only one work by him. Py this practice many famous authors, of whom no small library is likely to con- tain more than one work (such as Boswell, Dante, Gibbon, Lamb, Macaulay, Milton, indeed almost any of the English poets), will not appear in the catalogue ; while the man who has written both a First class reader ami a Second class reader, or a Mental arithmetic and a Written arithmetic, or two Sunday-school books, must be included. It is not necessary to say more to show the absurdity of the rule. If some authors must be omitted, let it be those who the librarian knows are never called for, whether they have written one or fifty works 67. Another objectionable economy is to put biographies under the name of the subject alone, omitting author-entry, so that there is no means of ascertaining whether the library possesses all the works of a given author. II. TITLE-ENTRY. First-word entry. (Anonymous works, 68-72; Periodicals, 73, 74; Fiction, 75 ; What is a first word, 76-80.) Changed titles, 81-83. First- word reference. (Plays and poems, 84; other works, 85.) Catch-word reference. (Anonymous works, 86 a; other works, 86 b.) Subject-word entry. (Anonymous biographies, 87.) Subject- word reference. (Anonymous works, 88 a; other works, 88 b.) Title-reference to corporate entries, 89. Title-reference from subtitles, 90. Double title-pages, 91. TITLE-ENTRY. 68. Make a first-word entry for all1 anonymous works,2 except anon- ymous biographies, which are to be entered under the name of the subject of the life.3 (If the author's name can be ascertained insert it within brackets.) 1 Of course there are exceptions to this rule. There are works which are always known by certain names, under which they should be entered, although the title-pages of different editions may not begin with this name, or may not even contain it. The most noteworthy example is Bible, which is the best heading — in an English cata- logue— for the Bible and for any of its parts in whatever language written and under whatever title published. This is the British Museum rule. It is of a piece with putting all periodicals uuder the heading Periodicals and all publications of learned societies under the head Academies. It would be much more in accordance with dictionary principles to put the separate books of the Bible each under its own name as given in the revised TITLE-ENTRY. 39 English version (Matthew, Gospel of, not Gospel of Matthew), with all necessary references. Under the present rule, references should be made to Bible from Testament, Old Testament, New Testament, Gospels, Apocrypha, Psalms, Pentateuch, the names of the single books, and from such well-known names as Breeches Bible, Speaker's commentary. In cataloguing the anonymous books of the Middle Ages, "Incipit" or "Here begyus," or "Book the first of," and similar phrases are not to be considered as first words. Thus the history of the Seven Sages appears under the following variety of title: 1. Incipit historia septem sapientu Rome. [Cir. 1475.] 2. In hoc optisculo snnt subtilitates septe sapientu roine valde perutiles. [Later.] 3. Historia septem sapientum Romie. 1490. 4. Historia calumnie nouercalis que septem sapientu iiiscribitur. 1490. 5. Ludus septem sapientum. [Cir. 1560.] And the titles of the versions are equally various : 1. Li romans des sept sages. 2. Li romans de Dolopathos. 3. Les sept sages de Roine. 4. Les sept saiges de romme. 5. Los siete sabios de Roma. 6. Hieuach volget ein gar schone Cronick vn hystori ausa denn Geschichten der Romern. 7. Die hystorie uau die seuen wise mannen van Romen. 8. Hystory of the seuen maysters of Rome. 9. The Hystorie of the seven wise maisters of Rome. 10. The sevin seages. 11. De siu sive mestere. Of course it will not do to catalogue these severally under Incipit, Hoc, Historia, Ludus, Romans, Sept, Siete, Hienach, Hystorie, Hystory, Sevin, and Siu. In this and other prose and poetical romances of the Middle Ages the heading must be taken in general from the subject of the romance ; the name appearing of course in the orig- inal language, with all necessary references from other forms. In the present case all the editions would be collected under Septem sapientes,* with references from Ludus, Sept sages, Siete sabios, Hienach, and Seven, provided the library has so many editions. Somewhat similarly collections of papers known by the name of a principal con- tributor or a previous owner or of the house where they were found should be en- tered under such name, or, if they must be entered under the name of an editor, should have a reference from such name; ex., Dudley papers, Winthrop papers, etc. A title like "The modern Plutarch" does not mean to imply that the work is writ- ten by Plutarchus ; such a book would be treated as anonymous, unless it bad an editor. 4 A catalogue of authors alone finds the entry of its anonymous books a source of incongruity. The dictionary catalogue has no such trouble. It does not attempt to enter them in the author-catalogue until the author's name is known. 3 For a smaller catalogue this may read "except anonymous works relating to a person, city, or other subject distinctly mentioned in the title, which are to be put under the name of the person, city, or subject." In the catalogue of a larger library where more exactness ("red tape," "pedantry") is indispensable, biography should be the only exception, the place of entry under subjects and under large cities being * Since this was in type I have come to the conclusion that all these should be entered under San- dabad (Lat. Syntipas), the reputed author of the original Indian romance. But the example will still serve to show the great variety in mediaeval titles, and the inconvenience of following a strict first- word rule. 40 TITLE-ENTRY. too doubtful. And in planning a manuscript catalogue, it should be remembered that a small library may grow into a large one, and that if the catalogue is made in the best way at first there will be no need of alteration. If a book's title-page is lost, and it is impossible to ascertain what it was from other copies or other editions, or from catalogues or bibliographies, use the half-title or the running title, stating the fact; if it has neither, manufacture a title, within brackets. Such an entry will require many references. G9. A single inscription by an unknown author needs no title entry, but should have subject-entry under the subject of which it treats, or the name of the place where it is found, or both. 70. When the author's name is known, it will be enough for Medium to make not an entry under the first word, but a reference from it to the author. The shelf-mark or class-mark should always be given with this reference, that the man who merely wishes to get the book need not have to look in two places for the mark. If there are several editions all the marks should be given, which is not satisfactory unless the imprints are also given, that is, un- less an entry is made and not merely a reference. The entry (or reference) for an anonymous work should be made, • even if the author's name is given in another edition. 71. An anonymous work which forms a part of a larger whole is to be entered where the whole would be, with a reference from its own title. Ex. New testament. See Bible. Die Klage. See Nibelungenlied. 72. Translations of anonymous works should be entered under the same heading as the original, whether the library possesses the original or not. Ex. Gisli'a saga. Story of Gisli the outlaw, from the Icelandic, by G. W. Daseut. So Perron's translation, called by him "Glaivedescouronnes," would appear under Saif-al-tidjau ; and the Arabian nights' entertainments under AlifJaila. Criticisms of anonymous works must be put under the heading of the work criticised. 73. Periodicals are to be treated as anonymous and entered under the first word. Ex. Popular science monthly, LittelTs living age. When a periodical changes its title the whole may be catalogued under the orig- inal title, with an explanatory note there and a reference from the new title to the old ; or each part may be catalogued under its own title, with references, "For a con- tinuation, see ," " For the previous volumes, see ." Treat almanacs and other annuals as periodicals. Do not confound periodicals with serials. The four characteristics of a periodical are : (1) that it be published at inter- vals usually but not necessarily regular : (2) in general that the publication be in- tended to continue indefinitely ; (3) that it be written by a number of contributors nuder the supervision of one or more editors ; (4) that it consist of articles on various subjects, so that a set of the work does not form an-organic whole- The 2d, 3d, and 4th criteria exclude works like Trollope's "The way we live now," and the "Ency- clopaedia Britaimica." There are some exceptions to the 3d, as " Brownson's quarterly review." TITLE-ENTRY. 41 Make a reference from the name of the editor when the periodical is commonly called by his name, as in the case of Silliman's Journal of science. The Memoirs, Proceedings, Transactions of a society are periodicals in point of (1) occasional publication, (2) indefinite continuance, and — so far as they contain any- thing beyond the record of the society's meetings — of (4) variety of subject ; but they lack the 3d characteristic, variety of authorship, inasmuch as the memoirs or other papers given in addition to "proceedings" proper may be considered as the work of the society acting through its members ; .the society, therefore, is the author, and the Transactions, etc., need not have title-entry. The; e are, however, some "Jour- nals" published by or " under the auspices of" societies which are really periodicals, and should be so treated in entry, the society being not the author but the editor. Again, there are works which occupy a borderland between the two classes, in regard to which the puzzled cataloguer should remember that it is not of much importance which way he decides, provided he is careful to make all necessary references. Ex- amples of such doubtful cases are "Alpine journal : a record of mountain adventure and scientific observation. By members of the Alpine Club ; " which contains nothing of or about the Club itself; — "Journal ol the American Institute, a monthly publica- tion devoted to the interest of agriculture, commerce, etc. Edited by a committee, members of the Institute," and " Journal of the Society of Arts and of The Institutions in Union," both of which are journals both in the sense of record of proceedings and of periodical publication. Newspaper titles are troublesome. It is not uncommon for the name of the place to be included in the name on the first page (as The Boston ^Egis), but to be dropped over the editorial column, or vice versa, or to be used for some years and afterwards dropped, or vice versa. The searcher can not always remember whether it is used or not. It would be well, therefore, to give under each name of a city the title of every newspaper published there which the library has. 74. Collections of extracts from a periodical should go under the name of the periodical. Ex. Life, Verses from. Punch, A bowl of. 75. Make a first-word entry or reference for all works of prose fiction. (Include the author's name in the entry.) Ex. Daughter of Heth ; novel, by W. Black. London, 1874. 3 v. O. The reason is that novels are known more by their titles than by their authors' names. Whether to make an entry or a reference depends on the space at command. An entry means giving the book-marks for every edition. With a reference this may be done ; but a reference without them obliges the reader to turn to the author-entry for such details, which is objectionable. It is better to give all the book-marks with the title. If the name of the hero or heroine enters into the title the entry should be made under that; ex., David Copperfield, Life and adventures of, by C. Dickens. 76. When a title begins with an article, the heading of a first- word entry or reference is the word following the article. Ex. Centaur, The, not fabulous, not The centaur not fabulous. The entry has commonly been made under the first word " not an article or preposition." But it is found to work badly to except the preposition in the titles of novels and plays, and it is awkward to omit or transpose it in any case. One reason for excepting the article — that there would bean immense accumulation of titles under the unimportant words A, The, Le, Der, Uno, etc. — is not so strong in the case of prepositions; the other — that it is difficult to remember with what article a given title begins — hardly applies at all to prepositions. The preposition is full as likely to fasten itself in the 42 TITLE-ENTRY. memory as the word that follows it. The strongest argument in favor of confining preposition-entry to fiction and the drama is that in other cases the word following the preposition will probably be a subject-word, so that one entry will do the work of two. This will occasionally be true, but not often enough, I think, to make much difference. 77. Wbeii a foreign phrase is used as an English title, refer from the article as well as from the following word. Ex. El Fureidis should have references to Cummins both under E and P ; L'arra- tiata both under L' and A to Heyse. 78. When a title begins with a word expressive of the number which the work holds in a series the first word entry or reference is to be made under the next word. Ex. Collection of papers, 8th, not Eighth collection. Letter, 1st and 2d, to the Ministry, not First letter, etc., under F, and Second letter under S. When the nu- meral comes after a word like Book or Part (as frequently in Latin after Liber, Pars, Toinus, Volumen) both are to be neglected and the word following put into the nom- inrative and used as a heading; e. g., " Pars priina epistolarum" is to be entered under Epistolae. Similarly Evening, Morning, Daily, and Weekly should be disregarded in titles of newspapers, otherwise we should have the morning edition at one end of the catalogue and the evening at the other. So "Appendix to," " Continuation of" " Sup- plement to" (but not "Reply to"), are to be disregarded when they are followed by the title of the work continued. "Reply to" and similar beginnings are to be put under Reply, etc., with a subject-entry under the author of the work replied to. 79. When the first word of a title is spelled unusually, all the editions should be entered under the word spelled in the modern or correct way, with a reference from the form adopted in the title. Ex. The hystorie of the saints would be entered — History.] The hystorie of the saints. We enter under the common spelling (1) in order to get all editions of a work to- gether, (Sur 1'autorite" paternelle" among the works on the Christian Fathers. .;'. Compound subject-names. 106. The name of a subject may be — (a) A single word, as Botany, Ethics. Or several words taken together, either — (6) A noun preceded by an adjective, as Ancient history, Capital punishment, Moral philosophy. (c) A noun preceded by another noun used like an adjective, as Death penalty, Flower fertilization. (d) A noun connected with another by a preposition, as Penalty of death, Ferti- lization of flowers. (e) A noun connected with another by " and," as Ancients and moderns. (/) A sentence, as in the titles "Sur la regie Paterna paternis materna ma- ternis" and "De usu paroemiae juris Gertnanici, Der Letzte thut die Thiire zu;" where the whole phrase would be the subject of the dissertation. There are three main courses open : (1) We can consider the subject to be the phrase as it reads, as Agricultural chem- istry, Survival of the fittest, which is the only possible method in (a) and undoubt- edly the best method in (c), (e), and (/), and in most cases of proper names, as Democratic Party, White Mountains, Missouri River (but see § 26). (2) We can make our entry in (&), (c), and (d) under what we consider the most significant word of the phrase, inverting the order of the words if necessary; as, Probabilities (instead of Theory of probabilities); Earth, Figure of the; Species, Origin of the, the word Origin here being by itself of no account ; Alimentary canal, Canal being by itself of no account; Political economy, Political being here the main word and economy by itself having a meaning entirely ditlereut from that which it has in this connection. (3) We can take the phrase as it reads in (c), (d), (e), and (/), but make a special rule for a noun preceded by an adjective (6), first, that all such phrases shall when possible be reduced to their equivalent nouns, as Moral philosophy to Ethics or to Morals, Intellectual or Mental philosophy to Intellect or Mind, Natural phi- losophy to Physics, Sanitary science to Hygiene, Scientific men to Scientists, Social science to Sociology; and, secondly, that in all cases where such reduction is impossible the words shall be inverted and the noun taken as the heading, as Chemistry, Agricultural; Chemistry, Organic; Anatomy, Comparative ; History, Ancient ; History, Ecclesiastical ; History, Modern ; History, Natural ; History, Sacrfd.* * This rule is proposed by Mr. Schwartz and carried out, with some exceptions, in his catalogue of the New York Apprentices' Library. 2 COMPOUND SUBJECT-NAMES. The objection to (1) is that it may be pushed to an absurd extent in the case (6). A man might plausibly assert that Ancient Egypt is a distinct subject from Modern Egypt, having a recognized name of its own, as much so as Ancient history, and might therefore demand that the one should be put under A (Ancient) and the other under M (Modern)* and similar claims might be made in the case of all subject-names to which an adjective is ever prefixed, which would result in filling the catalogue with a host of unexpected and therefore useless headings. Nevertheless the rule seems to me the best if due discrimination be used in choosing subject-names. The objection to (2) is that there would often be disagreement as to what is " the most important word of the phrase," so that the rule would be no guide to the reader. But in connection with (1) and as a guard against its excesses (2) has its value. The combined rule might read : 107. Enter a compound subject name by its first word, inverting the phrase only when some other word is decidedly more significant or is often used alone with the same meaning as the whole name. Ex. Special providences and Providence, Proper names and Names. It must be confessed that this rule is somewhat vague and that it would be often of doubtful application, and that on the other hand (3) is clear and easy to follow. But there are objections to (3). It would put a great many subjects under words where nobody unacquainted with the rule would expect to find them. Works on the would hardly be looked for under Alimentary canal Canal. Dangerous classes Classes. Digestive organs Organs. Dispensing power Power. Domestic economy Economy. Ecclesiastical polity Polity. Final causes Causes. Gastric juice Juice. Laboring classes Classes. Military art Art. Parliamentary practice Practice. Political econemy Economy. Solar system System. Suspended animation Animation. Zodiacal light Light. Another objection is that in most cases the noun expresses a class, the adjective limits the noun, and makes the name that of a subclass (as International law, Remit- tent disease, Secret societies, Sumptuary laws, Typhoid fever, Venemous insects, Whig party, Woolen manufactures), and to adopt the noun (the class) as the heading is to violate the fundamental principle of the dictionary catalogue. The rule is urged, however, not on the ground of propriety or congruity with the rest of the sys- tem but simply as convenient, as a purely arbitrary rule which once understood will be a certain guide for the reader. "If he is told that he shall always find a subject arranged under its substantive form and never under an adjective he can hardly fail to find it. If, on the other hand, he is told that Comparative anatomy is under C and Morbid anatomy under A, that Physical geography is under P and Mathematical geography under G, he will only be bewildered, and accuse the cataloguer of making distinctions that it requires too much study to appreciate. Theoretically the distinc- tions may be justified, but practically the simpler way of using the noun only is more * Which would be much like putting Williams's "Shakespeare's Youth" tinder Youthful Shake- speare. Individuals should not be divided. COMPOUND SUBJECT-NAMES. 53 easily grasped by the common mind. And the system of classifying names under the surname is precisely analogous; * thus Smith, John, Smith, Joseph, Smith, William, seems to me to be arranged on the same principle as History, Ancient, History, Ecclesiastical, History, Modern, History, Sacred." t This is plausible. If the public could ever get as accustomed to the inversion of subject-names as they are to the inversion of personal names the rule would undoubt- edly be very convenient; but it might be difficult to teach the rule. The catalogue treatment of personal names is familiar to every one, because it is used in all cata- logues, dictionaries, directories, and indexes. But there are less than three hundred subject-names consisting of adjective and noun in a catalogue which has probably over 50,000 names of persons. The use of the rule would be so infrequent that it would not remain in the memory. And it should be observed that the confusion caused by the different treatment of Morbid anatomy and Comparative anatomy would only occur to a man who was examining the system of the catalogue, and not to the ordinary user. A man looks in the catalogue for treatises on Comparative anatomy; he tinds it, where he first looks, under C. He does not know anything about the disposition of works on Morbid anatomy, and is not confused by it. Another man looks for works on Morbid anatomy and uuaer M he is referred to Anatomy, Morbid, t He finds there what he wants and does not stop to notice that Comparative anatomy is not there, but under C, consequently he is not puzzled by that. And even those who are taking a general survey of all that the library possesses on anatomy would probably be too intent upon their object to pause and criticise the arrange- ment, provided the reference from Anatomy to Comparative Anatomy were per- fectly clear, so that they ran no risk of overlooking it and had no difficulty in finding the subject referred to. The specific-entry rule is one which the reader of a dictionary catalogue must learn if he is to use it with any facility; it is much better that he should not be burdened with learning an exception to this, which the noun rule certainly is. It ought also to be noticed that this plan does not escape all the difficulties of the others. In reducing, for instance, Intellectual philosophy or Moral philosophy, will you say Mind or Intellect, Morals or Ethics? And the reader will not always know what the equivalent noun is, — that Physics = Natural Philosophy, for example, and Hygiene = Sanitary science. Nor does it help us at all to decide whether to prefer Botanical morphology or Morphological botany. These difficulties, which beset any rule, are only mentioned here lest too much should be expected from a plan which at first sight seems to solve all problems. The practice of reducing a name to the substantive form is often a good one ; but should not be insisted upon us an invariable rule, as it might lead to the adoption of some very out-of-the-way names. As a mere matter of form Nebulae is to be preferred for a heading to Nebular hypothesis, Pantheism to Pantheistic theory, Lyceums to Lyceum system, etc. * But if analogies are to have any weight, why should we follow that of names of persons, which are inverted, more than that of names of places, which are not? We do not say Mountains, White; Regions, Antarctic; Sea, Red; why should we say Anatomy, Comparative; Arts, fine; System, Brunonian? — C. t Schwartz, slightly altered. JThis is on the supposition that Morbid Anatomy has been considered by the cataloguer not to be a distinct subject, entitled to a name of its own. 54 COMPOUND SUBJECT-NAMES. In (ft), (c), and (d) the same subject can often be named in different ways; as, (b) Capital punishment. Floral fertilization. (c) Death penalty. Flower fertilization. (d) Penalty of death. Fertilization of flowers. Is there any principle upon which the choice between these three can be made, so that the cataloguer shall always enter books on the same subject under the same heading? I see none. When there is any decided usage (i. e., custom of the public to designate the subjects by one of the names rather than by the others) let it be followed ; that is to say, if, in the examples given above, the more customary phrases are Capital punishment, Fertilization of flowers, then we must use those names, preferring in the first case the name which begins with an adjective to its equivalent beginning with a noun, and in the other the name beginning with a noun to its equivalent beginning with an adjective. As is often the case in language, usage will be found not to follow any uniform course. If usage manifests no preference for either name, we can not employ the two in- differently ; we must choose one ; and some slight guide to choice in certain cases may perhaps be found. On examination of the phrases above, it appears that they are not all of the same composition. In Comparative anatomy, Capital punishment, the noun is the name of a general subject, one of whose subdivisions is indicated by the adjective. And Capital, Comparative have only this limiting power; they do not imply any general subject. But Ancient history, Mediaeval history, etc., may be viewed not only in this way (History the class, Ancient history and Mediaeval history the subdivisions) but also as equivalent to Antiqiu'ty : History, Middle Ages : History (as we say Europe : History), in which case the adjectives (Ancient, Mediaeval) imply a subject and the noun (History) indicates the aspect in which the subject is viewed. Here, then, we choose Ancient and Mediaeval as the heading, on the principle of § 68. So in (6) and (c) each of the nouns in turn may be considered as expressing the more general idea and the other as limiting it; e.g., we can have various headings for Death considered in different lights, among others as a penalty ; and we can have headings of various sorts of penalties, among others death. It is evident that this collection of penalties taken together makes up a class, and therefore this belongs to a style of entry which the dictionary catalogue is expected to avoid ; but the series of headings beginning with the word Death would not make a class, being merely different aspects of the same thing, not different subordinate parts of the same subject. When an adjective implies the name of a place, as in French literature, German philosophy, Greek art, it is most convenient on the whole to make the subject a division under the country. In this way all that relates to a country is brought to- gether and arranged in one alphabetical series of subjects under its name (see § 258). It is not of the slighest importance that this introduces the appearance of an alpha- betico-classed catalogue, so long as the main object of a dictionary, ready reference, is attained. Of course Hebrew language, Latin language, Latin literature, and Punic language can not be so treated ; it is the custom and is probably best not to put English language and English literature under England, as they have extended far beyond the place of their origin; books on the language spoken in the United States go with those on the English language except the few on Americanisms, which are separated, like accounts of any other dialect. Our literature can not be treated satisfactorily. It is never called United States literature, and no one would expect to find it under United States. On the other hand the name American prop- erly should include Canadian literature and all the Spanish literature of South Amer- ica. It is, however, the best name we have. k. Double entry. 108. It is plain that almost every book will appear several times in the catalogue: Under author, if he is known. Under first word of title, if the book is anonymous or the title is memorable. DOUBLE SUBJECT-ENTRY. 55 Under each distinct subject. Under form-heading in many cases. Under many other headings by way of cross- reference. And this is necessary if the various objects enumerated on p. 8 are to be attained quickly. But inasmuch as the extent and therefore the cost of the catalogue increases in direct proportion with the multiplication of entries, it becomes worth while to inquire whether some of these can not be dispensed with by devices which will suit the inquirer as well or nearly as well. Such economies are mentioned in §§ 93-97, 113, 114. 109. Enter a polytopical book under each distinct subject. Ex. "An art journey in Italy and Greece ;" " The history of France and England compared;" "Handbook of drawing and engraving." But some of the subjects may be omitted if their treatment is so slight that it is not worth while to take any notice of them, which is occasionally the case even when they are mentioned on the title-page. Sometimes an analytical can take the place of a full entry for the less important topics. The points to be considered are: (I) Would this book be of any use to one who is looking up this subject? (2) Is the entry or reference necessary as a subject-word entry or reference (that is, to one who is looking for this book) ? Some books are polytopical which do not appear to be so at first sight. A collection of portraits of Germans, for example, has the subject Germans, and so far as it has any artistic value might be quoted as one of the illustrative works under the subject Portrait painting or Portrait engraving.* If the biographical interest were all, the general collections would be put under Portraits and the national collections (as "American portrait gallery," "Zwei Huudert Bilduisse deutscher Manner") under countries, with references from the general heading to the various countries, as directed in § 97. If the artistic interest were alone considered, the general titles would be put under Portraits, and collections by painters or engravers of particular schools would be put under the names of the schools; which would amount to nearly tho same arrangement as the previous. So in regard to Hymns; there are three sources of interest, the devotional, the literary (which would lead to national subdivision), and the denominational ; a sim- ilar treatment would place general collections under Hymns, collections in any lan- guage under the national heading, with either double entry under the name of the denomination or a reference from that to the national heading, specifying which of the collections there enumerated belong to the denomination. But the devotional interest so decidedly preponderates that it has been customary to collect everything under the form-heading Hymns. In Full, almanacs will have form-entry under Almanacs and subject-entry under the district about which they give information. Sometimes if an ordinary reference be made from one subject to another the title referred to cannot easily bo found. A reference from Architecture to Spain. Archi- tecture, is convenient, but a reference to the same heading from Gothic architecture is not, because it obliges the inquirer to look through the whole list of Spanish archi- tecture to find perhaps one title on the Gothic. In like manner there would be few entries of works on vases under most countries, so that no division Vasts would be made, and the inquirer must search for his book among a number of titles on Art. And if the reference were made the other way — from the country to Vases — the in- quirer would be in the same plight. There is no need, however, of double entry. If merely the name of the particular author or authors referred to under any subject be inserted in the reference, the whole difficulty vanishes. Ex, Gothic architecture. [Various titles.] See also Spain ; Architecture (STREET). It is to be noted that herein Short has a great advantage ; it does not lose so much * It also belongs to the cla-s Portraits, but that is in the Form-catalogue, not the Subject-catalogue. 56 DOUBLE SUBJECT-ENTRY. MISCELLANIES. by double entry and cau afford to make it in many cases where Medium must for economy put the reader to some trouble. The notes, too, in such catalogues as the Quiucy or the Boston Public history-list afford a convenient way of briefly inserting considerable double entry where it is thought expedient without any apparent incon- sistency. 110. If a book purports to treat of several subjects, which together make the whole or a great part of one more general, it may be put either under each of the special subjects, or under the general subject, and m the latter case it may or may not have analytical refer- ences from the specific subjects, according as the treatises are more or less distinct and more or less important. E. g., "A. treatise on anatomy, physiology, pathology, and therapeutics," which might be put under each of those four headings, ought rather to be entered under Medicine, in which case, if the separate parts are by different authors, analyticals might very well be made under the four headings; and at auy rate an analytical under the first would occasionally be useful as equivalent to a subject-word reference. 111. When a considerable number of books might all be entered under the same two or more headings, entry under one will be sufficient, with a reference from the others. On the other hand, if in printing it were noticed that under auy subject only one or two titles were covered by the cross-references to countries (as from Sculpture to Greece, Italy, Denmark), it may be thought that double entry under nation and subject would be preferable. A man is provoked if he turns to another part of the catalogue to find there only one title. However, it should be remembered that one or two titles repeated under each of many subjects will amount to a considerable number in the whole. The want of uniformity produced by this mixture of reference and double entry is of less importance. 112. When there are many editions of a book, it is allowable to merely refer under the subject to the author-entry. In a college library, for instance, the full entry of all the editions of the classics under their appropriate subjects (as of the Georgics under Agriculture, of Thucydides under Greek history, and Polybius under Roman history) would be a waste of room ; it is enough to mention the best edition and refer for other editions and translations to the author's name. I. Miscellaneous rules and examples. 113. Trials relating to a vessel should be pu t under its name ; Short would make no other entry. Exploring expeditions or voyages in a named vessel should have at least a reference from the name. Ex. Jeune Eugenie. MASON, W. P. Report. Boston, 1822. 8°. Herald, H. M. S., Voyage of the. See Seemaiin, B. 114. A civil action is to be entered under that party to it who is. first named on the title-page, with a reference from the other. In Short (and in Medium aud Full, if the report is anonymous) this will be the only entry, — unless the case illustrates some subject, in which case entry or reference under that will be needed. Patent cases furnish the most common examples of subject-entry MISCELLANIES. SUBJECT REFERENCES. 57 of trials, but everyone will remember trials in which points of ecclesiastical law, of medical jurisprudence, etc., have been so fully discussed as to compel reference from those subjects. 115. Euter "Review of," "Remarks on," " Comments on" under the au- thor reviewed (as a combined subject and subject-word entry), and, if worth while, under the subject of the book reviewed. 116. The distinction between Bibliography and Literary history is, with reference to the books on those subjects, a distinction of more or less; the two classes of books run into each other and it is hard to draw the line between them. 117. Any theological library will probably contain books which treat — (1) of the four last things, death, judgment, heaven, and hell. (2) of the nature of the life after death, a much more extensive ques- tion than (I). (3) whether there is any future life, without regard to its nature. (4) of the retribution after death for the good and for the evil deeds done in this life. (5) whether there is any retribution for evil in a future life. (6) what is its nature. (7) how long does it last Here are seven questions on nearly the same subject-matter, and there are six names for them. (It will be found, by the way, that although there are some books treating of each separately, many of the works overlap as the subjects do, and that the titles are no guide whatever to the contents of the books.) Two main courses are open to the cataloguer : 1st. To make one heading, as Future life, cover the whole, with subdivisions. In this way the catalogue becomes classed to a certain extent. No matter, if that is on the whole the more convenient arrangement ; 2d. More consistently, to make four headings : Eschatology (covering the 1st ques- tion, four last things, with references to each of them), Future life (its nature, in- cluding retribution both for good and evil, 2d and 4th questions), Future punishment (existence, nature, duration, and so including universalism, with references to Purga- tory and Hell, covering the 5th, 6th, and 7th questions), Immortality (is there anyf 3d question). B. ENTRIES CONSIDERED AS PARTS OF A WHOLE. 118. The systematic catalogue undertakes to exhibit a scientific arrangement of the books in a library in the belief that it will thus best aid those who would pursue any extensive or thorough study. The dictionary catalogue sets out with another object and a different method, but having attained that object — facility of reference — is at liberty to try to secure some of the advantages of classification and system in its own way. Its subject-entries, individual, general, limited, extensive, thrown together without any logical arrangemeut, in most absurd proximity — Abscess followed by Absenteeism and that by Absolution, Club-foot next to Clubs, and Communion to Communism, while Christianity and Theology, Bibliography and Literary his- tory are separated by half the length of the catalogue — are a mass of utterly discon- nected particles without any relation to one another, each useful in itself but only by itself. But by a well-devised net-work of cross-references the mob becomes an army, of which each part is capable of assisting many other parts. The effective force of the catalogue is immensely increased. 58 SUBJECT REFERENCES. 119. Make references from general subjects to their various subordinate subjects and also to coordinate and illustrative subjects. Cross-references should be made by Full from C lasses of persons (Merchants, Law- yers, Artists, Quakers, etc.) to individuals belonging to those classes; from Cities to persons connected with them by birth or residence, or at least to those who have taken part in the municipal affairs or rendered the city illustrious; from Countries to their colonies, provinces, counties, cities, etc. (unless their number is so great or the divisions are so well known that reference is useless); also, under the division History to rulers and statesmen, under Literature to authors, under Art to artists, and so on; from other Subjects to all their parts, and to the names of persons distin- guished for discoveries in them or knowledge of them. Short and Medium will make such of these references as seem most likely to be useful. The construction of this system may be carried on simultaneously with the ordinary cataloguing of the library, each book as it goes through the cataloguer's hands not merely receiving its author- and subject-entries, but also suggesting the appropriate cross-reference ; but when all the books are catalogued the system will not be com- plete. References are needed not merely to the specific from the general but to the general from the more general and to that from the most general. There must be a pyramid of references, and this can be made only by a final revision after the com- pletion of the cataloguing. The best method is to draw off in a single column a list of all the subject-headings that have been made, to write opposite them their includ- ing classes in a second column and the including classes of these in a third column ; then to write these classes as headings to cards and under them the subjects that stood respectively opposite to them in the list, to arrange the cards alphabetically, verify the references, and supplement them by thinking of all likely subordinate headings and ascertaining whether they are in the catalogue, and also by considering what an inquirer would like to be told or reminded of if he were looking up the subject under consideration. In this way a reasonably complete list may be made. It will, however, often happen that there is no entry under the including subject. Take a simple instance. The catalogue, we will suppose, contains twenty histories of towns belonging to seven counties in Connecticut. In the revision described above references have been made both from Connecticut to these counties and to the towns from the counties, but only three of the counties have any titles under them. The others would not trake their appearance in the catalogue at all if there were no cross- references. And as this will happen continually, it follows that the system will very greatly increase the number of headings and therefore the length of the catalogue. Such fullness may be allowable in regard to the state which contains the library, which, of course, should be treated with exceptional completeness. It may possibly be worth while for all the States of the Union and for England, but to attempt to do the same for all countries and all subjects is too much. A modification of the plan must be introduced which will make it much less complete but still useful. With many subjects the next heading in the ascending series must be skipped, and the references massed under one still higher ; in the supposed case, for example, the ref- erences to all the towns will be made under Connecticut and under those counties alone which have any other entry under them. 120. Make references occasionally from specific to general subjects. Of course much information about limited topics is to be found in more general works; the very best description of a single plant or of a family of plants may per- haps be contained in a botanical encyclopedia. This fact, however, must be im- pressed upon the inquirer in the preface of the catalogue or in a printed card giving directions for its use; it is out of the question to make all possible references of the ascending kind. From Cathedrals, for example, one would naturally refer to Christian art and to Ecclesiastical architecture, because works on those subjects will contain more or less on cathedrals. But so will histories of architecture and FORM-ENTRY. 59 histories of English, French, German, or Spanish architecture; so will travels in England, France, Germany, Italy, Spain. And anyone who desired to take an abso- lutely complete survey of the subject, or who wad willing to spend unlimited time in getting information on some detail, would have to consult such books. Yet the cata- loguer may very excusably not think of referring to those subjects, or if he thinks of it may deem the connection too remote to justify reference, and that he should be overloading the catalogue with what would be generally useless. There are many things that are seldom used, and then perhaps but for an instant, and yet their existence is justified because when wanted they are indispensable, or because they make useful what is otherwise useless: a policy of insurance, life-pre- servers in a steamer, the index of a book, large parts of the catalogue of a library, among others the cross-references. Of such a nature, but much less useful, more easily dispensed with, is a 121. Synoptical table of subjects. I mention its possibility here; I do not advise its construction, because there is little chance that the result would compensate for the immense labor. IV. FORM-ENTRY. National entry has already been discussed under SUBJECTS (§ 97). 122. Make a form-entry for collections of works in any form of literature. In the catalogues of libraries consisting chiefly of English books, if it is thought most convenient to make form-entries under the headings Poetry, Drama, Fiction, it may be done, because for those libraries Poetry is synonymous with English poetry, and so on ; but if a library has any considerable number of books in foreign lan- guages the national classification should be strictly followed; that is to say, entries should be made under English drama, English fiction, English poetry, Latin po- etry, etc. ; only those collections of plays, novels, poems that include specimens of several literatures being put under Drama, Fiction, Poetry. Or the English plays, novels, poems, etc., may be entered under Drama, Fiction, Poetry, etc., and the dra- matic works, etc., of foreign literatures under the names of the several Iit6ratures. The rule above confines itself to collections. It would be convenient to have full lists of the single works in the library in all the various kinds of literature, and when space can be afforded they ought to be given ; if there is not room for them, references must be made under these headings to the names of all the single authors ; an unsat- isfactory substitute, it is true, but better than entire omission. Note, however, that there is much less need of these lists in libraries which give their frequenters access to the shelves than where such access is denied, so that borrowers must depend en- tirely on the 'catalogue. In the case of English fiction a form-list is of such constant use that nearly all libraries have separate fiction catalogues. It has been objected that such lists of novels, plays, etc., do not suit the genius of the dictionary catalogue. The objection is of no importance if true; if such lists are useful they ought to be given. There is nothing in the dictionary plan which makes them hard to use if inserted. But the objection is not well founded. Under the names of certain subjects we give lists of the authors who have treated of those sub- jects; under the names of certain kinds of literature we give lists of the authors who have written books in those forms ; the cases are parallel. The divisions of fiction, it must be understood, are not the authors who have written novels but the different kinds of novels which they have written ; they are either such varieties as " Histor- ical fiction," " Sea stories," " Religious novels," or such as " English fiction," " French fiction." The first divisions we do not make for single works because it would be very difficult to do so and of little use ; but if there were collections in those classes we should certainly introduce such headings. The second division (by language) is made as it is in Poetry and Drama, both for single works and collections. 60 FORM-ENTRY. ANALYSIS. There is no reason but want of room why only collections should be entered under form-headings. The first entries of collections were merely title-entries, and Mr. Crestadoro is the only person who has thought that plays, etc., deserve two title- entries, one from the first word, the other from what we might call the form-word. It is not uninteresting to watch the steps by which the fully organized quadruple syn- detic dictionary catalogue is gradually developing from the simple subject-word index. 123. Make a form-entry for single works in the rarer literatures, as Japanese, or Kalmuc, or Cherokee. References can be substituted, if necessary. 124. Make a form-entry of encyclopaedias, indexes, and works of similar practical form, the general ones under the headings Encyclopae- dias, etc., the special ones in groups under their appropriate subjects. Thus au agricultural dictionary will not be entered under Dictionaries, but under Agriculture, in a little division Dictionaries. Now and then some one asks for "a grammar," "the dictionary." It does not follow that it would be well to jumble to- gether, under a form-heading, Grammars or Dictionaries, all grammars and lexi- cons in all languages. Those who inquire so vaguely must be made to state their wishes more definitely. The cataloguer does his part if he inserts a note under such headings explanatory of the practice of the catalogue ; as Grammar. [First a list of works on general grammar, then] Note. For grammars of any language, see the name of the language. V. ANALYSIS. 125. Enter in full every work, forming a part of a set, which fills a whole volume or several volumes. Ex. Colombo, C. Select letters rel. to his four voyages to the New World ; tr. and ed. by R. H. Major. London, 1847. 8°. (Vol. 2 of the Hakluyt Soc.) 126. Enter analytically, that is without imprint — a. Every work, forming part of a set, which has a separate title-page and paging, but forms only part of a volume of the set. Ex. Fairholt, F. W. The civic garland; songs from London pageants, with introd. and notes. (In Percy Society, v. 19. 1845.) Full must and Medium may make a full entry in this case also. That is to say, Full will draw the line at a separate title-page, Short and perhaps Medium at filling a volume. Those catalogues which give no imprints at all and those which give no imprints under subjects will of course give none for analyticals. b. Every work which, though not separately paged or not having a title-page, has been published separately, whether before or since its publication in the work under treatment. Ex. Dickens, C. J. F. Little Dorrit. (_ln Harper's mag., v. 12-15, 1855-57.) c. Under author, (1) every separate article or treatise over ' pages in length ; (2) treatises of noted authors ; (3) noted works even if by authors otherwise obscure. 'This limif must be determined by each library for itself, with the understanding that there may be occasional exceptions. ANALYSIS. STYLE. 6 1 d. Under subject treatises important either (1) as containing the origin of a science or a controversy or developing new views, or (2) as treating the subject ably or giving important information, or (3) for length. Absolute uniformity is unattainable ; probably no one will be able to draw the line always at the same height. It is most desirable — and fortunately easiest — to make analysis when the subject is well marked, as of biographies or histories of towns, or monographs on any subject. General treatises or vague essays are much harder to classify and much less valuable for analysis. In analyzing collections of essays original articles should be brought out in preference to reviews, which are commonly not worth touching (except in a very full catalogue) either under the author of the work reviewed or under its subject. Of course exception may be made for famous reviews or for good reviews of famous works. A work giving a careful literary esti- mate of an author may be an exception to this remark; reviews of the "Works" of any author are most likely to contain such an estimate. Many reviews, like Macau- lay's, are important for their treatment of the subject and not worth noticing under the book reviewed, which is merely a pretext for the article. e. Make analytical fo'tffe-references for stories in a collection when they are likely to be inquired for separately. 127. Make analyticals for the second and subsequent authors of a book written (but not conjointly) by several authors. (See § 4.) Sometimes it is better to give full entry under two headings than to make the second analytical. Ex. A "Short account of the application to Parliament by the merchants of London, with the substance of the evidence as summed up by Mr. Glover," is to be entered under London. Merchants, as first author, but as Glover's part is two- thirds of the whole, it should also be entered under him, the entry in each case being made full enough not to mislead. 128. In aualyticals it is well to give the date of the book referred to and also, though less necessary, to state the pages which contain the article. Many readers will not notice these details, but they will do no one any harm and will assist the careful student. VI. STYLE. A. HEADINGS. Type, 130-134. Italics, 131. Pseud., 135, 136. Ed., 137. Family name, 138. Christian name, 139, 140. To distinguish authors of the same name, 139-144. To distinguish subject headings, 145. Dashes, 146. References, 147. B. TITLES. Order, 148,149. Abridgment, 150-160. Articles, 151, 152. Unnec- essary words, 153, 153£. Dates, 154. Initials, 155. Abbreviations, 156. Numbers, 157. Position, 158. " Same," 159. Words to be retained, 160-164. Analyticals, 164. Exact copying, 165. Language, 167, 168. 62 STYLE. Translations, 168, 169. Transposition of tbe article, 170. Anon., 171- 173. Lord, Gen., ed., 174. Transliteration, 175. c. EDITIONS, 176, 177. D. IMPRINTS. The parts of an imprint and their order, 178. Transliteration, 179. Abbreviations, 180. Two or more places, 181, 182. Publisher's name, 183. Colophon, 184. Dates, 185-194. Number of volumes, 195. Typo- graphical form, 196. Maps, 197. E. CONTENTS, 198-200, AND NOTES, 201. F. KEFERENCES, 202, 203. FF. LANGUAGE, 204. G. CAPITALS, 205, 206. H. PUNCTUATION, ACCENTS, BRACKETS AND PARENTHESES, ITALICS, etc., 207-212. i. ARRANGEMENT. Order of the English alphabet, 213. Headings, 214-239. Person, place, title, subject, form, 214. Forenames, 215, 216. M', etc., 217. Family names nearly alike, 218. Family names the same, 219. Fore- names the same, 220. Forenames not generally used, 221, 222. Fore- names changed, 223. Titles, Sees, 224. Possessive case, 225. Greek and Latin names, 226. Compound names, 227-232. Pseudonyms, 233. Incomplete names, 234. Signs, 235. Every word regarded, 236. Ab- breviations, 237. Titles, 240-252. Under an author, 240-248. Edi- tions, 242, 243. Numerals, 244. Translations, 245. Biographies, etc., 246. Criticisms, 247. Analytical, 248, 249. Under countries, 250- 252. Synopsis, 252. Bible, 252. Contents, 253. Subjects, 254- 258. Homonyms, 254. Topical arrangement, 255. Chronological ar- rangement, '256. Cross-references, 257. Divisions, 258. j. ETC. Supplement, 259. An economy, 260. Incunabula and other rare books, 261. STYLE. 1'29. Uniformity for its own sake is of very little account ; for the sake of intelligibility, to prevent perplexity and misunderstanding, it is worth something. And it is well to be uniform, merely to avoid the question, " Why were you not consistent?" STYLE : HEADINGS. 63 A. HEADINGS. 130. Print headings in some marked type. Either heavy-faced (best, if it can be had not too black), small capitals (handsome), or italics (least pleasing); never capitals (ugly and hard to read). Christian names should be in ordinary type ; to make them like the heading is confusing, to have a special type for them would be extravagant. 131. Italicize titles of honor and similar distinguishing words. Earl, Mrs., Rev., of Paris, Jlexandrinits, etc., also the name of a country or state following the name of a town, as Wilton, N. H., Cambridge, Eng. fiST These words are to be italicized only in the Leadings and not in the title. They are italicized in the heading to distinguish the name and bring it out clearly; there is no need of such distinction in titles. Do not print Badeau, Gen. A, Life of Gen. Grant. If the heading is italicized, the words Mrs., Earl, etc., must be distinguished from it in some other way. 132. Print the headings of all the four kinds of entry (author, title, sub- ject, form) in the same kind of type. In some indexes a distinction is made bet ween persons and places or between authors and subjects, but in a catalogue varieties of type must be reserved for more important distillations. The Catalogue of the Library of the Interior Department uses a heavy- faced title type for authors and a light-faced antique for other entries, with very sat- isfactory effect; but such typographical luxuries are not within general reach. 133. Print the whole of an author-, title-, or form-heading in the special type ; also an alternative family name and the family name of the second of joint authors, if both authors are put into the head- ing (§ 240), and the family names of British noblemen. Ex. Cervantes Saavedra, Varnhagen von Ense, Cape of Good Hope, Bickuell & Goodhue, American Antiquarian Society, Comparative anatomy, Political economy; Chasteillon (Lat. Castalio or Castellio), S. ; Craik, G. L., and Knight, C.; Manchester, W. Drogo Montagu, 7th Duke of. 134. Print the first word of a title-entry in the special type. Ex. Rough diamond. But compound words, whether hyphened or not, should be printed wholly in the heading type ; as, Out of door amusements. London, 18G4. 8°. This is merely for looks ; the kind of type has nothing to do with the arrangement. 135. Add pseud, to the heading for all sorts of false names of whatever origin. So much is necessary to prevent mistake on the part of the public ; but it is a waste of time for the cataloguer to rack his brains to discover which of the ingenious names invented by Pierquin de Gembloux (cryptonym, geonym, phrenonym, etc.) is appli- cable to each case ; for the only result is that .readers are puzzled. A list of these terms may be found in the Notice of Que~rard by Olphar Hamst [i. e., R. Thomas], London, 1867. The unauthorized assumption of any name should be indicated by such phrases as as called, calling himself, dit, soi disant, se dicente or che si Sice, que se dice or se dicendiose, genannt, genoemd, etc. 136. When an author uses a single pseudonym add it to his name, un- less the entry is made under the pseudonym; when the pseudo- nym is used only in one work, and different ones in other works, include it in that title, followed by [pseud.]. Ex. Clemens, S. C. (pseud. Mark Twain). Godwin, Wm. The looking-glass; by T. Marcliffe 64 STYLE : HEADINGS. 137. Add cd. to the beading when it is needed to show that a book is merely put together, not written, by the author in hand. The title usually shows this fact clearly enough without ed. Short would omit to note the fact, and in Full, perhaps even in Medium, it is better to state it in the title than in the heading. The distinction, after all, is rarely of practical value. 138. Repeat the family name for each person. Ex. Smith, Caleb. Sermon. ( Smith, Caleb. Sermon. Smith, Charles. Address. > not J — , Charles. Address. Smith, Conrad. Narrative. J , Conrad. Narrative. 139. Distinguish authors whose family uaine is the same by giving the forename in full or by initials. In a card catalogue the names should always be given in full ; in printing, initials are often used to save room; but the saving is small, and the advantages of full names are so considerable that any cataloguer who is relieved from the necessity of the greatest possible compression ought to give them. For the more common fore- names fullness can be combined with economy by the use of the colon abbreviations (C: = Charles, etc. See Appendix V.) Under subjects it is rare that two persons of even the same family name come together and initials are sufficient; but here also the colon initials should be used. An exception may well be made in the case of men always known by a double name ; as, Sydney Smith or Bayard Taylor. Nobody talks of Smith or Taylor. Taylor, B., conveys no idea whatever to most readers. Taylor, Bayard, they know. When one name alone is usual, as Gladstone, Shakes- peare, and when both forms are used, as Dickens and Charles Dickens, initials will suffice. Of course there can be no uniformity in such practice, but there will be util- ity, which is better. Forenames used by the author in a diminutive or otherwise varied form may be given in that form. Ex. Carleton, Will ; McLean, Sally ; Renter, Fritz. 140. Mark in some way those forenames which are usually omitted by the author, and neglect them in the arrangement. Ex. Collins, (Wm.) Wilkie; Gerard, (Ce"cile) Jules (Basile). This is of practical use. The consulter running over the Collinses is puzzled by the unusual name unless some generally accepted sign shows him that it is unusual. He does not quickly recognize Charles Dickens in Dickens, Charles John Huffam ; or Leigh Hunt in Hunt, James Henry Leigh; or Max Miiller in Miiller, Friedrich Max. Besides, the eye finds the well-known name m^re quickly if the others are, as it were, pushed aside. The most common methods of distinction are inclosure in parentheses and spacing: Guizot, (Francois Pierre) Guillaume, or Guizot, Francois Pierre Guillaume. Tne latter is objectionable as unusual, as taking too much room, and as making em- phatic the very part of the name which one wants to hide. I prefer the style, Dickens, Charles (in full C : J : Huffam). See § 221. But in those catalogues in which all Christian names are inclosed in parentheses, some other sign must of course be used to mark the less usual names. 141. Distinguish authors whose family and forenames are the same by the dates of their birth and death, or, if these are not known, by some other label. Ex. Up., C. E., Capt., Col., D.D., F.R.S., etc., always to be printed in italics. In a manuscript catalogue, in preparing which of course one never knows how many new names may be added, such titles should be given to every name. In print- HEADINGS. 65 ing, if room is an object, they maybe omitted except when needed for the distinction of synonymous authors. Note, however, that many persons are commonly known and spoken of by a title rather than by their first name, and it is a convenience for the man who is looking, for instance, for the life of Gen. Greene, whose Christian name he does not know, to see at once, as he runs his eye over the list of Greenes, which are generals, without having to read all the titles of books written by or about the Greenes in order to identify him. For the same reason Mrs. should always be given with the name of a married woman, whether the forename which follows is her own or her husband's; even when the following form is adopted, "Hall, Mrs. Anna, Maria (Field- ing) ,tci/eo/S. C.," which is always to be done when in her titles she uses her husband's initials. In this case a reference should be made from Hall, Mrs. S. C., to Hall, Mrs. A. M., and so in similar cases. If forenames are represented under subjects by their initials, it is well to give Miss or Mrs. with the names of female authors. The reader •who would like to read a book by Miss Cobbe on a certain subject may not feel sure that Cobbe, F. P., is Miss Cobbe. As late as 1760 unmarried women were usually styled Mrs. ; as, Mrs. Lepel, Mrs. Womngton, Mrs. Blount, and among writers Mrs. Hannah More. There is no objection to following this practice in cataloguing, as the object of the cataloguer is not to furnish biographical information but to identify the people catalogued. 142. Titles of Englishwomen are to be treated by the following rules: * In the matter of titles an Englishwoman in marrying has every- thing to gain and nothing to lose. If she marries above her own rank she takes her husband's title in exchange for her own, if below her own rank she keeps her own title. Titles of married women. a. The wife of a peer takes her husband's style. That is, she is Baroness, Viscountess, Marchioness, etc. In cataloguing, say Brassey, Annie (Allnutt), Baroness; not Brassey, Annie (Allnutt), Lady. b. The wife of a knight or baronet is Lady. Whether this title pre- cedes or follows her forename depends upon whether she had a title before her marriage. That is, if Lady Mary Smith marries Sir John Brown (either knight or baronet), she is Lady Mary Brown, also if Hon. Mary Smith marries Sir John Brown (knight or baronet) she is Lady Mary Brown ; but if Miss Mary Smith marries Sir John Brown (knight or baronet), she becomes Mary, Lady Brown. c. A maid of honor retains her Hon. after marriage, unless, of course, it is merged into a higher title. Thus, if she marries a baronet she is the Honble Lady Brown, if a peer the Lady So and So, in either case as though she had been a -peer's daughter. d. The wife of an earl's (or higher -peer's) younger son is never the Houble Lady ; if she used the Lady before marriage in her own right she does not, of course, add anything by such marriage, but the wife of a younger son of a lower peer than an earl is Honble Mrs. (not Lady) — the younger children of all peers using, of course, the family name, with or without their forenames, accord- ing to their rank. * Prepared by Misa May Seymour and Mr. F. Wella Williams (Lib. jnl., 13: 321, 361). 4892 LI 5 66 STYLE: HEADINGS. e. If the lady to whom the title Hon. belongs in virtue of her father's raiik marries a commoner, she retains her title, becoming Hon. Lady, if she marries a knight or baronet 5 and Hon. Mrs., if her husband has no title. None of these courtesy titles are inherited by the children of those who bear them, the third generation of even the highest peer being simply commoners unless raised in rank by marriage or merit. Titles of unmarried women. f. The title Lady belongs to daughters of all noblemen not lower than earl. g. The title Hon. belongs to daughters of viscounts and barons; also to an untitled woman who becomes maid of honor to the Queen, and this title is retained after she leaves the service. If a woman who has the title Lady becomes maid of honor she doeo not ac- quire the title Hon. 143. Distinctive epithets to be in the same language as the name. Ex. Kniaz, Fiirst von, Freiherr zu, due de Magenta, Bishop of Lincoln, eveque de Heaux ; but Emperor of Germany, King of France, not Kaiser and roi, because names of sover- eign princes are given in English. Treat in the same way patronymics habitually joined with a person's name ; as, Clemens Alexandrinus. 144. Prefixes (i. e., titles which in speaking come before the name), as, Hon., Mrs., Rev., etc., should be placed before the Christian name (as Smith, Gapt. John), and suffixes as Jr., D.Z>., LL.D., after it (as Channing, James Ellery, D.D.). Hereditary titles generally follow the Christian name, as Derby, Thomas Stanley, Ixt Earl of ; but British courtesy titles (i. e., those given to the younger sons of dukes and marquesses) precede, as Wellesley, Lord Claries (2d son of the Duke of Wellington). In other languages than English, French, and German the title usually precedes the forename; as, Alfieri, Conte Vittorio. Occasionally a French nobleman uuiformly places his title before his forenames; as, Gasparin, Comte Age"nor de. Lord should be replaced by the exact title in the names of English noblemen, e. g., Lord Macaulay should be entered as Macaulay, 1st Baron. Lord in the title of Scotch judges follows the family name; as, Kames, H. Home, aftenvards Lord. The title Baronet is given in the form Scott, Sir Walter, Bart. Patronymic phrases, as of Dedham, follow all the names ; but they must immedi- ately follow the family nan e when they are always used in close connection with it, as Girault de St. Farjeau, Eusebe; similarly aine", fils, jeune, as Dumas^Zs, Alexandre; Didot fils, Ambroise. Latin appellatives should not in general be separated from their nouns by a comma ; as, Caesar Heisterlacensis. 145. Distinguish two subject-headings which are spelled alike by itali- cized phrases in parentheses. Ex. Calculus (in mathematics'). Calculus (in medicine). 146. Medium avoids the repetition of the heading with all titles after the first by using a dash. Short usually employs indention. Indention takes as much room as the dash and is much less clear. There should always be at least a hair-space between the end of the dash and the next letter; in- deed that is the rule of all good printing. Under a subject the repetition of the TITLES (ORDER, ABRIDGMENT). 67 author's name is indicated by a second dash.* (The repetition of the title is shown by the word Same.) Cobbett, Wm. Emigrant's guide. — A little plain English. London, 1795. 8°. - Same. Phila.,1795. 8°. — Porcupine's works. Atheism. BEECHER, L. Lectures, etc. — BENTLEY, R. Confutation of A. Folly of A. and deism. Matter and motion. FOTHERBY, M. Atheomastix. 147. Print in the special type a heading occurring in other parts of the catalogue, when a reference is intended. After See or In, or when in a note some book contained in the catalogue is referred to; as, "For a discussion of the authorship, see Graesae's Lehrbuch." B. TITLES. 1. ORDER. 148. Preserve the order of words of the title. Short will depart from the order whenever it can not otherwise abridge the title ; Medium and Full will do the same, but they will bracket all words introduced out of their original place as much as if they did not occur in the title at all. 149. When the title-page begins with the indication of the series to which the book belongs, followed by the title of the book, trans- pose the series name to a parenthesis after the imprint, including the number in the series, when the series is numbered. Ex. American commonwealths. Virginia ; a history of the people, by John Esten Cooke, would be entered Cooke, J: E. Virginia ; a history of the people. Boston, 1883. D. (Amer. commonwealths.) 2. ABRIDGMENT. 150. The more careful and student-like the probable use of the library the fuller the title should be, — fuller, that is, of information, not of words. Many a title a yard long does not convey as much meaning as two well-chosen words. No precise rule can be given for abridgment. The title must not be so much shortened that the book shall be confounded with any other book of the same author or any other edition of the same book, or that it shall fail to be recognized by those who know it or have been referred to it by title, or that it shall convey a false or insufficient idea of the nature of the work and (under the subject) of its theme and its " After trying several experiments I have settled upon the following as producing the best effect: Put before the second and following lines of a title 3 em quads, before and after the em dash that denotes repetition an eu quad, before and after the double dash (an em dash followed by an en dash) an en quad, between the parts of the double dash a 5-em space, before Same, in addition to the regular en quad a 5-em space, before the first line of Notes and Contents an em quad. (Do not indent the other lines of Notes and Contents at all.) before the place of publication an em quad, between the date and the size-mark an en quad and a 5-em space. 68 STYLE: TITLES (ABRIDGMENT). method of treating its theme.1 On the other hand, it must not retain anything which could reasonably be inferred from the rest of the title or from its position under a given heading.2 151. Omit the preliminary article when it can be done without altering the sense or too much offending the ear. It will not do even for Short to catalogue " On the true, the beautiful, and the good " thus : Cousin, V. True, beautiful, good; but a list of Buckstone's plays may as well be printed — Breach of promise, comedy. — Christening, farce. — Dead shot, farce. — Dream at sea. — Kiss in the dark, farce. — Lesson for ladies, com., though the meaning of "Christening" and "The christening" is slightly different, and "Kiss in the dark" might be taken for an injunction, whereas "A kiss in the dark " is evidently only a title. Still neither Short nor Medium should hesitate to omit even in these cases. Besides the economy, the alphabetical order is brought out more clearly by this omission. That can also be done awkwardly by transposing the article; as, — Breach of promise, The ; com. I — Dead shot, The ; farce. — Christening, The ; farce. | — Dream at sea, The. 152. Short omits articles in the title. Ex. "Observations upon an alteration of the charter of the Bank of England" is abridged : "Alteration of charter of Bank of England," which is certainly not eupho- nious, but is as intelligible as if it were. Medium usually indulges in the luxury of good English. Perhaps in time a catalogue style will be adopted in which these elisions shall be not merely allowed, but required. It may be possible to increase the number of cataloguing signs. We have now 8° where we once had octavo, then 8vo. Why not insist upon N. Y. for New York, L. for London, P. for Paris, etc., as a few adventurous libraries have done ? Why not make free substitution of commas for words, and leave out articles and prepositions in titles wherever the sense will still remain gleanable ? 153. Omit puffs3 and many descriptive words which are implied either by the rest of the title4 or by the custom of books of the class 1 This clause must be very differently interpreted according to the character of the catalogue. It expresses rather the object to be aimed at than the point which an ordinary catalogue can expect to reach. To fully describe and characterize every book is impossible for most cataloguers. Still by a little management much may be briefly done. The words drama, play, novel, historical novel, poem, retained from or inserted in the title tell a great deal in a little space. 2 It must make these omissions not merely that the catalogue may be short but that consulting it may be easy. Other things being equal, that title is best which can be taken in at a glance. What has been said in defence of full titles may be true, that " it takes longer to abridge a title than to copy it in full," but it is also true that it takes longer for the printer to set the unabridged title, and longer for the reader to ascertain its meaning, and a long-title catalogue, besides being more expensive, is more bulky and therefore less convenient. 3 Ex. A (plain) treatise on; an (exact and full) account. 4 In "Compendious pocket dictionary," either compendious or pocket is superfluous. TITLES (ABRIDGMENT). 69 under treatment,1 and those descriptive phrases which, though they add to the significance of the title, do not give enough in- formation to pay for their retention.2 £. Omit all other unnecessary words. In the following examples I use the double (( )) to indicate what every catalogue ought to omit, the single ( ) to indicate what may well be omitted. Ed. alt. (priore einendatior). 2e e"d. (augmente'e). 2d ed. (with additions and improvements). with ((an appendix containing)) problems. ((a collection of)) papers relating to the war in India. ((a series of)) letters. ((On the)) brick architecture of the north of Italy. (debate) on ((the subject of)) the impressment bill. on ((the question of)) a financial agent. ((being some)) account of his travels. in ((the year)) 1875. Sermons ((on various subjects)). N. B. Must occasionally be retained to distin- guish different collections of sermons by the same author. The grounds of infant damnation ((considered in)) (a) sermon ((preached)) Nov. 5, (1717). Boston, 1717. O. Sermon (the Lord's day after the) interment of. Opera ((quse extant)) (omnia). Geology ((of the State)) of Maine. Tables for ((the use of)) civil engineers. Reflections ((suggested by a perusal of))3 J. H. Palmer's ((pamphlet on the)) "Causes (and consequences) of the war." Occasioned by his ((book entitled)) " True narrative." defended against ((the cavils of)) G. Martin. Howe during his command (of the King's troops) in North America. So a "Discourse in Albany, Feb. 27, 1848, occasioned by the death of John Quincy Adams, etc. Albany, 1848. O.," would become Disc., Albany, Feb. 27, death of J. Q. Adams. Albany, 1848. O., in Medium; and Short would probably omit "Albany, Feb. 27." 154. For chronological phrases use dates. Ex. For "from the accession of Edward ill. to the death of Henry vm.," say [1327- 1547]. 155. In Short and Medium use initials for all Christian names intro- duced in titles, notes, and contents, and omit the initials altogether for famous men unless there are two of the same name. Ex. Write "Life of L. V. Bell," "ed. by F. J.. Furnivall," but "Lives of Cicero, Milton, Tell, Washington ; " and distinguish by initials the Bachs, Grimms, Hum- boldts, Schlegels. Short may as well omit the initials of editors, translators, etc. E. g., Dante. Divine comedy ; tr. by Cayley. London, 1851-54. 4 v. S. — Same. Tr. by Wright. London, Bohn, 1854. O. — Same. Tr. by Longfellow. Boston, 1867. 3 v. O. 1 Ex. Nekrolog, 1790-1800 (enthaltend Nachrichten von dern Leben merkwiirdiger in diesem Jahre verstorbener Personen). 2 "by an American not by birth but by the love of liberty." 3 Substitute [on]. 70 STYLE: TITLES (ABRIDGMENT). 156. Abbreviate certain common words always, and less common words in a long title which can not be shortened in any other way. Abbreviations should suggest the word for which they are used, and should not, if it can be avoided, suggest any other. When one abbreviation is used for two words, if the context does not determine the sense the abbreviation must be lengthened. The most common and useful are Abp. (Archbishop), a. d. Lat. (aus dem Latein- ischen), add. (additions), Amer. or Am. (American), anon, (anonymous), app. (ap- pendix), Aufl., Ausg., or even A. (Auflage, Ausgabe), bibl. (biblical, bibliographical, bibliotheca, etc.), biog. (biographical, biography), Bp. (Bishop), B. S. L., etc. (Bonn's scientific library, etc.), Chr. (Christian), class, (classical), col. or coll. (collections, college), com. (commerce, committee), cotnp. (compiled, compiler), cone, (concerning), dept. (department), doin. (domestic), ed. (edited, edition, editor), eucyc. (encyclo- paedia), ff. (folios or leaves), geog., geol., geom. (geology, geography, geometry), ges. (gesaminelte), Ges. or Gesch. (Geschichte), Gr. (Great, Greek), H. F. L. (Harper's family library), hrsg. (herausgegeben), imp. (imperfect), iucl. (including), int. (in- torno), lib. (library), mein. (memoir), mis. or miscel. (miscellaneous), nat. (natural), n. d. (no date of publication), n. p. (no place), n. s. (new series), n. t.-p. (no title- page), nouv. (nouvelle), obi. (oblong), p. pp. (page, pages), pseud, (pseudonym, pseudonymous), pt. (part), pub. (published), rec. (recensuit), rel. (relating, relative), rept. (report), rev. (review, revised), s. orser. (series), sarnm. (sammtlich), sm. (small), soc. (society), t.-p. mat., t.-p. w. (title-page mutilated, wanting), tr. (translated, traduit, tradotto, etc.), trans, (transactions), u. (und), iibers. (ubersetzt), v. (volume), v. (von, but give van in full), w. (wanting). For others see Appendix V., pp. 119-126. 157. Express numbers by Arabic figures instead of words. Ex. With 30,000 (not thirty thousand) men ; but Charles il., in place of King Charles the Second. 158. In Short omit all that can be expressed by position. Ex. In a title-entry How to observe. H. Martineau 9287 and in a subject-entry Horse. CARVER, J. Age of the. Phila., 1818. 12° 9077 MURRAY, W. H. The perfect. Bost., 1873. 8° 1694 If this is thought too disagreeable, use an initial for the heading when it is repeated in the title ; as : Horse. CARVER, J. Age of the H. Phila., 1818. 12° 9077 MURRAY, W. H. The perfect II. Bost., 1873. 8° 1694 SIMPSON, H. H. portraiture. N. Y., 1868. 12* 7407 159. In cataloguing different editions of a book avoid the repetition of the title by using *' Same." Ex. Chaucer, G. Canterbury tales; [ed.] by T. Tyrwhitt. London, 1822. 5 v. 8°- — Same. Ed. by T. Wright. London, 1847-51. 3 v. 8°. The word following Same should generally begin with a capital. 160. Retain under the author only what is necessary to distinguish the work from other works of the same writer, but under the subject what is needed to state the subject and show how it is treated. The preface of an excellent catalogue remarks that " the primary object of subject- entries is to inform the reader who have written upon a given topic rather than what has been written." This is a mistake. The inquirer wishes to know both ; in fact he wants to know who have written about it because their character will suggest to him what they have written. TITLES: (ABRIDGMENT). 71 161. Retain both of alternative titles. Ex. Knights and sea-kings ; or, The Middle Ages. The reason is that the book may be referred to by either title. 162. Retain in the author entry the first words of the title; let the abridgement be made farther on. Because (1) it facilitates library work, by rendering the identification of the book quicker and surer; (2) if there is no part of the title which must be given, two per- sons may abridge so differently that not a single word shall be the same in the two abridged titles, so that two works will be made out of one (I have often known this to happen); (3) books are frequently referred to by the first word of the title (Grassi's " Notizie sullo stato presente degli Stati Uniti" may be quoted as Grassi : Notizie). Short, however, can probably not afford to retain first words in all cases. Half the phrases used at the beginning of titles add little or nothing to the meaning, such as "Treatise on," "System of," "Series of lectures on," "Practical hints on the quanti- tative pronunciation of Latin" (here "Practical hints" belongs in the preface, not in the title, to which it really adds nothing whatever). " History of" must often be retained under the subject. One can say YOUNG, Sir W. Athens. 3d ed. London, 1804 ; bat under Athens that would not be enough ; it would be necessary to vrrite YOUNG, Sir W. History of Athens, to distinguish it from such works as Stuart's "Antiquities of Athens," and Leake's "Topography of Athens." But if there are enough titles under Athens to admit of the subheadings Art, Antiquities, History, the words "History of" again become unneces- sary. Medium ought always to retain first words under author, and may omit them under subject; but such phrases as " Manual of," " Lectures on," do much to explain the character of the book, and for that reason ought often to be retained. Mottoes, however, at the top of the title-page (often separated by a line from the real title) may be neglected. Sometimes such superscriptions are important, gener- ally not. When the author's name alone or his name and titles are first on the title-page, as is frequently the case in old Latin and modern French books, omit them. Example: Jani Jacobi Boissardi Vesuntini de divinatione. A custom has grown up of late, particularly in French publications, of putting at the top of the title-page, before the title proper, the name of the series to which the •work belongs or else what might be called the classification of the book. The name of the series should be given in parentheses after the imprint. The cataloguer may retain or omit the classification at his discretion. To avoid all possibility of mistake Full will mark the omission of these words by ... 163. Do not by abridgment render the words retained false or mean- ingless or un grammatical. 3. MISCELLANEOUS RULES AND REMABKS. 164. In analyticals, if there are several entries under the author referred to, give the first word or words of the title referred to, so that the entry can easily be found ; if there are few entries take one or two words which unmistakably identify the book. A word or two is enough1 and those abbreviated if possible ;3 but sometimes, when the article has an insufficient or no title it is well to give more of the title of the book in which it is contained, if that is more communicative ; e. g., Wordsworth, J. Grammatical introduction. (In his Fragments of early Latin. 1874.), where "of early Latin" explains "grammatical introduction." The date should always be given to show in what edition of the work the passage is contained and also to what period the ideas belong. Giving the pages facilitates reference. 72 STYLE: TITLES. >(/» Mueller, F. M. Chips, v. 1. 1867.) not (In Mueller, F. M. Chips from a German workshop, v. 1. 1867.) *(/» Graevius. Thes. RODI. antiq., v. 10. 1699.) 165. The title is to be copied, so far as it is copied, exactly. Omissions may be made without giving notice to the reader, unless by etc. when the sentence is manifestly unfinished.1 Additions made to a title are to be marked by inclosing the words in brackets [ ].z All additions to be in the same language as the title; if this can not be done, put the addition into a note.3 After a word spelled wrongly or unusually insert [sic].* 1 The use of ... is suited only to bibliographies. I do not see why even Full should use this sign, except for very rare or typographically-important books. The title in a catalogue is not intended to be a substitute for the book itself aud must leave some questions to be answered by the latter. But if the . . . are used they should be printed as a group, separated from the word or punctuation mark which they follow or precede by a slight space, as . ... or ... . 3 The use of [ ] is important, both as a check on indiscriminate addition and as an aid to identification. It will not often be of use in the latter respect, but as one can never tell when it will be needed it must be employed always. 3 The intercalation of English words in a foreign title is extremely awkward. 4 Ex. The beginning end [sic] end of drinking. 166. If the title-page is lost and the title can not be ascertained, use the half-title or the running title, stating that fact ; if the book has neither, manufacture a title, putting it in brackets. 167. State in what language the book is written unless it is evident from the title. Ex. Aelianus. De natura animalium [Gr. et Lat.]. Aeschines. Orations on the crown [Gr.], with Eug. notes. 168. Retain in or add to the title of a translation words stating from what language it was made, unless that is evident from the author's name or is shown by its position after the original title. Ex. Beckford, Wm. Vathek; [tr.fr. the French], Lessing, Gotthold Ephraim. Laocoon ; tr. by E. Frothingham. Euripides. 'iTTTroAurof aTeyavijobpof. — Eng. The crowned Hippolytus; tr. by M. P. Fitz-Gerald. 169. In the entry of translations after the original give the translated title, preceded by the name of the language of the version. This is for the good of persons unacquainted with the original language, who would not know the book by the foreign title, and also to identify the book, different trans- lations not always having the same title. Sand, George. Le chateau des d6sertes. — Eng.. The castle in the wilderness. — L'homme de neige. — Eng. The snow man. Dante. Divina commedia. — Eng. Vision of hell, purgatory, and paradise ; tr. by Gary. Divine comedy ; tr. by Cayley. 170. Ivi anonymous titles entered under the first word put the trans- posed article after the first phrase. Ex. Anie en peiue, Une, not Ame, Une, en peine. TITLES. EDITIONS. 73 171. Under the author distinguish the titles of anonymous books. Enclosing the dash in brackets is ugly [ — ] ; enclosing the title in brackets is mis- leading, as if the title were false. Stars (*) or daggers (t) are sometimes prefixed to the title, but they are often used for other purposes and they throw the titles out of line. [Jnow.] may be used between the title and the imprint ; t in the same posi- tion would take less room and as soon as accepted would be equally intelligible ; it has occasionally been used. 172. In the preliminary card catalogue enclose in brackets the name of the author of an anonymous or pseudonymous work. This may be extended to cases where the name is only implied. Ex. " By the Bishop of Ripon," " M. Tullii oratio; " meaning M. Tullii Ciceronis oratio, or Cat. used in old editions for Catullus. 173. In the title-entry of an anonymous work insert the author's name in brackets. Ex. Colloquies of Edw. Osborne; [by M. A. Manning]. London, I860. S. 174. Words like Lord, Geu., Rev., King, ed., tr., occurring in the title are not to be italicized. 175. When the title is in an alphabet which differs from the English, transliterate the first few words and add a translation. Ex. [Pisni Russkaho naroda; Songs of the Russian people.] When the title is in Greek, followed by a Latin translation, it is customary to nse the latter alone, and the same may be done in the case of other languages. But for identification it is necessary that some part of the book's own title should be printed. It is not enough to give merely a made title or a translation. c. EDITIONS. 176. Distinguish editions by the number, the name of the editor, trans- lator, etc., and by mentioning in parentheses (not brackets) after the imprint the collection, library, series, to which it belongs, or the name of the society by which it is published. Ex. 4th ed., 10th thous., New ed., ed. by T. Good, (Bonn's standard library), (Weale's series, v. SiO), (Camden Soc., v. 3). It is shorter and nearly as useful to give Bohn, Weale, etc., as publishers in the imprint, — London, Bohn, 1867. O. The various editions of different volumes may be stated thus: Hales, Stephen. Statical essays. (Vol. 1, 3d ed.) London, 1738, 33. 2 v. O. The specification of edition is necessary: (1) for the student, who often wants a particular edition and cares no more for another than he would for an entirely different work; (2) in the library service, to prevent the rejection of works which are not really duplicates. And the number of the edition is a fact in the literary history of the author worth preserving under his name ; under the subject it is some guarantee for the repute, if not for the value, of the work. 177. Full will note carefully whether there is any change in a new edi- tion, or whether it is merely what the Germans call a title-edition (the same matter with a new title-page). Medium and Short generally content themselves with noting the number of the edi- tion. Short often takes no notice of the edition. 74 STYLE: IMPRINTS. D. IMPRINTS. 178. The imprint consists of place of publication, publisher's name, date, number of volumes, number of pages, number of maps, engravings, and the like, and typographic form, which are to be given in the above order. Washington, 1875. 2 v. 7, 441, (12); 4, 424 p. O. ; 20 engr., 24 photographs, 4 maps. The imprint proper consists merely of place, date, form, and number of vol- umes (Wash., 1875. 2 v. O). The other details are given by Medium in particular cases. Full gives them always, but it may be doubted whether their use is frequent enough to pay for the very considerable increase in the trouble of cataloguing. It is worth while to show by some sign (as pm.) that the pages are less than 100 or than 50 (40 is the limit of the French Bibliotheque Nationale), for the fact is easily ascer- tained, and the mark fills little space and may prevent some one sending for a book he does not care to look at. It is not an exact designation, but many things are use- ful which are not exact. On the other hand an inquirer might occasionally fail to see the best treatise on his subject, thinking it too short to be of any value. Neither Short nor Medium should give the exact number of maps, plates, etc., but it is well worth while, especially for a popular library, to add the word illus. to the titles of books in which the illustrations are at all prominent, and, under Biography, to note the presence of portraits. Imprints are indispensable in a catalogue designed for scholars, that is for college libraries, for historical or scientific libraries, and for large city libraries. They may not be of much use to nine persons in ten who use those libraries, but they should be inserted for the tenth person. But in the majority of popular city and town libraries neither the character of the readers nor of the books justifies their insertion. Their place may be much better filled (as in the Quincy catalogue) with more important matter — with " Illus" or "Portraits" or a word or two explaining an obscure title. But the number of volumes should invariably be given. And the year of publication is important under subjects. Epithets like " Large paper," which are applicable, generally, to only a part of the copies of a book, should be mentioned after all the details which apply to the whole edition (place, date, number of volume, etc.). 179. Do not translate the name of the place of publication, but if it is not in a Eoman alphabet transliterate it. Gottingen, not Gottingen ; Miinchen, not Munich ; Wien, not Vienna; Londini, not London ; Lisboa, not Lisbon, when the first are the forms on the title-page. So [Moskva], Moskau, Moscou, Moscow, according as the imprint is in Russian, German, French, or English. 180. Use abbreviations and even initials for names of the most common places of publication. Ex. Bait., Borl., Bost., Camb., Cin., Cop. or Copenh., Got., L. (London), Lisb., Lpz., Madr., N. O., N. Y., Oxf., P. (Paris), Phila., St. P. (St. Petersburg), Ven., Wash. ; and use the ordinary abbreviations for state names. (A list is given in Appendix V.) 181. If there is more than one place of publication Short and Medium should give only one. If the places are connected by "and," as London and Edinburgh, New York and London, take the first ; if they are unconnected, as Berlin Paris Geneve H. Bailliere take that which proves on examination to be the real place of publication. In this economy there is some danger of cataloguing the same book at different times with IMPRINTS. 75 different imprints, and making two editions out of one; but a little watchfulness will prevent this. 182. If the place differs in the different volumes, state the fact. Ex. History of England. Vol. 1-2, Boston ; 3-5, N. Y., 1867-C-9. 5 v. O. 183. Print publishers' names, when it is necessary to give them, after the place. Ex. London, Pickering, 1849 ; Antwerpen, bi mi Claes die Graue. The publisher's name must not be mistaken for the place. I have seen a dozen books catalogued as Redfield, 185-. D ; Redfield being a New York publisher who had a fancy for making his name the most prominent object in the imprint of his books. 184. If the place or date given at the end of the book differs from that on the title-page, or if place and date are given there only, they should be printed in brackets. Ex. Augsb., 1525 [colophon Nuremb., 1526]. Lpz., [col. 1571]. 185. In early works the date is sometimes given without the century, as a im vierten Jahre," i. e., 1604. Of course the century should be supplied in brackets. 186. Masonic dates should be followed by the date in the usual form. Ex. 5834 [1834]. O. 187. Chronograms should be interpreted and given in Arabic numerals. Ex. Me DuCit Christ Vs = 1704. 188. When tlie place or date is given falsely, whether intentionally or by a typographical error, add the true place or date in brackets, if it can be ascertained. Ex. London, 1975 [1775], O. Boston, 1887 [1886]. O. Paris, 1884 [mistake for 1874]. O. En Suisse [Paris], 1769. 189. When the place or date is not given, supply it in brackets, if it can be ascertained. If neither is discoverable, write n. p. (=no place), n. d. (=no date), to show that tue omission of place and date is not an oversight. Ex. n. p., n. d. O. 190. But avoid n. d., and if possible give the decade or at least the cen- tury, even if an interrogation point must be added. Ex. London, [17—]. Q. Phila., [182-?] O. 191. Print the date in Arabic numerals. Ex. 1517 for M D XVII or CIO 10 XIIIX. When the subarrangement of the catalogue is by dates (as in that of the Amer. Philos. Society), it may be well to place the date uniformly at the end of the line in this order: O. Wash., 1864. Otherwise the best order is to put the place and date immediately after the title, because like it they are taken from the title-page. The form, which is not copied but is the cataloguer's own assertion, then comes last. The dates can be made prominent in a chronological arrangement by printing them in heavy type, as in Prof. Abbot's " Literature of the doctrine of a future life." In Very Short the German style of printing dates should be adopted, 742 (i. e., 1742), 875 (i. e., 1875). 76 STYLE: IMPRINTS. 192. When different volumes of a work were published at different times, give the extreme dates. Ex. Paris, 1840-42. O. Sometimes Vol. 1 is of the 2d ed. and its date is later than that of Vol.2. This is in Medium: (Vol. 1, 2d ed.) 1874, 69-73. 5 v. O; in Short merely 1869-74. 193. In cataloguing reprints, Full should give the date of the original edition. Ex. Ascham, R. Toxophilus, 1545. London, 1870. O. (Arber's reprints.) or 3d ed. London, 1857 [1st ed. 1542]. O. The labor of always hunting up the original date is so great that Medium may be allowed to give it when it can easily be ascertained and omit it in other cases. In a printed catalogue, if the first edition is in the library, of course its date need not be given with the subsequent editions. 194. In analytical Medium and Full should give the date of the work referred to, and the number of pages; Short should specify at least which volume is meant. The date, if it be that of original publication, tends to show the style of treatment ; if it be that of a reprint or of " Works " it shows which of the various editions in the library is meant. The number of pages will help the reader to decide whether the reference is worth looking up. The Birmingham Free Library has an ingenious way of printing analytical. The title is in long primer type, the parenthesis is in pearl, of which two lines will justify with one of the long primer. Fossils. Eeceut and fossil shells by Woodward (Wea™i9fre'') Gleig, G. R. Eminent military commanders (p^Vo'^Si.) 3 duo 1832. By this arrangement the analytical nature of the reference is made much clearer and often a line is saved. But it is very troublesome to the printer. 195. Give the number of volumes. An imperfect set can be catalogued thus : Vol. 2-4, 6-7. Bost., 1830. 5 v. O, or Bost., 1830. 7 v. (v. 5 w.). O. 7 v. O means Vol. 1-7 if nothing is said to the contrary, and any number of missing volumes can be enumerated in the second of these forms ; but as the first volumes of periodicals are often missing, the exception may be made of always cataloguing them in the first form. Whatever Short may be forced to do by its system of charging books, Medium and Full ought to give the number of volumes bibliographically, that is to say, they should count only that a volume which has its own title, paging, and register. If the parts of a work have a continuous register or a continuous paging they form one volume ; but if they are called Vol. 1, Vol. 2 on the title-page they may be described as 1 v. in 2. For the bibliographical cataloguer binding has nothing to do with the matter. That the binder has joined two or more thin volumes or divided a thick one ought to be recorded in the accessions-book and in the shelf-list, but if not worth notice in the catalogue; if mentioned at all it should be in such a way that the description of the accidental condition of a single copy in a particular library shall not be mistaken for an assertion applicable to a whole edition (thus, 1 v. bd. in 2, or 2 v. bd. in 1, as the case may be). A work which has a title-page, but is cou. nected with another work by mention on its title-page as part of the volume, or by continuous paging or register, is said to be appended to that work. 196. Let the signs f°, 4°, 8°, etc., if used, represent the fold of the sheet as ascertained from the signature, not be guessed from the size. In the older books this is important, and in modern books the distinction between the octavo and the duodecimo series is so easilv ascertained that it is not worth while IMPRINTS. 77 to be inaccurate. The size may be more exactly indicated, if it is thought worth while, by 1. or sin., sq., obi., prefixed to the fold, as 1. 8°, sm. 4°. The " vo" or "mo" should be represented by a superior ° if it can be had, otherwise a degree-mark °, though manifestly improper, must be employed; it has abundant usage in its favor. Another method of giving the form is f° (8), 4° (2), 8° (4), in which f°, 4°, 8° indicate the apparent form of the book as the terms folio, quarto, octavo are generally under- stood, and the figures within the parentheses show the number of leaves intervening between the successive signatures. "In the folio the sheet of paper makes two leaves or four pages, in the 4° four leaves, in the 8° eight, in the 12° twelve, and so on. When a sheet of paper is folded into six leaves, making what ought to be a 6° book, it is called a 12° printed in half sheets, because such printing is always done with half-sized paper, or with half-sheets, so as to give a 12° size. From a very early period it has been universal to distin- guish the sheets by different letters called signatures. At present a sheet has A on the first leaf or Al on the first leaf and A2 on the second, which is enough for the folder's purpose. But in former times the signatures were generally carried on through half the sheet, and sometimes through the whole. Again, in modern times, no sheet ever goes into and forms part of another ; that is, no leaf of any one sheet ever lies between two leaves of another. But in the sixteenth century, and even later in Italy, it was common enough to print in quire-fashion, the same letter being used for the whole quire, and the leaves of the quire distinguished as they were suc- cessively placed inside of one another by the figures 2, 3, 4, so that a book actually printed in folio might have the signatures of a modern octavo. In exact bibliography such books are sometimes described as 'folio in twos,' ' folio in fours.' Rules are given for determining the form of printing by the water-lines of the paper and by the catchwords. It is supposed that the latter are always at the end of the sheet, and also that the water-lines are perpendicular in folio, octavo, and decimo-octavo books, horizontal in quarto and duodecimo. But in the first place a great many old books have catchwords at the bottom of every page, many have none at all ; and as to the rule of water-lines, there are exceptions to every case of it."* For anything but exact bibliographical description it is better to take no account of the fold of the sheet, but either to give the size in centi- meters or to use the notation of the American Library Association (see APPENDIX III, p. 115), which is founded on measurement. FE, anything less than 10 centimeters. Tx, " between 10 and 12£ centimeters. T, " " 12^ and 15 " S, " " 15 and 17$ " D, " " 17iand20 " O, " " 20 and 25 " Q, " " 25 and 30 " F, " over 30 centimeters. F<, " " 40 " F6, " "50 " And so on. 197. Maps may be identified either by giving the scale or by measure- ment. The measure (in centimeters) should be taken from the inner margin of the de- grees, unless the map extends beyond it, in which case measure to the farthest point ; pictures at the side are not to be included in the measure unless they come within the degree-mark. The perpendicular measure to be stated first, then the horizontal. * De Morgan, altered. 78 STYLE : CONTENTS AND NOTES. * E. CONTENTS AND NOTES. 198. Give (under the author) a list of the contents of books containing several works by the same author, or works by several authors, or works on several subjects, or a single work on a number of distinct subjects,1 especially if the collective title does not suffi- ciently describe them.2 'As a collection of lives. •Only Full can give the contents of all such works, including the memoirs, trans- actions, etc., of all the learned societies. And in an analytical catalogue this is much less important. When every separate treatise is entered in its proper places under the names of its author and of its subject, why should it be given again in a long column of fine type which few persons will ever read ? Because, if analysis is not complete, contents supplement it ; and one who has forgotten author and subject may occasion- ally recall them by looking over a "contents;" and this list is, so far as it goes, a sub- stitute for a classed catalogue in this respect. Moreover, the "contents" is needed to fully explain the character of the subject-entry (see § 4). In the division Biography under countries we have many such titles as "Memoirs of eminent Englishwomen," "British senators," "Political portraits." It is an advantage to the reader, though perhaps neither a great nor a frequent advantage, to be able to find out from the cata- logue what Englishwomen and what British senators he shall find described in the books. No catalogue can be considered complete that omits such information. For collected works of any author "contents" have been found so useful that even Short often gives them, especially of late, and strange to say, not rarely prints them in the most extravagant style, allowing a line for each item. One may sometimes see a quarter of a page left bare from this cause. 199. When a single work fills several volumes give the contents under the author, provided the division is definite and easily described. Object, that the inquirer may know which volume he wants ; application, chiefly to dictionaries and historical works ; method, in general, giving dates and letters of the alphabet, which take little room. It is particularly important also to fully de- scribe in this way very bulky works ; Walton's Polyglott is a good example, in con- sulting which, without such a guide, one may have to handle ten gigantic folios. 200. Under the subject repeat so much of the contents as is necessary to show how the subject is treated or what part is treated in the different volumes. This is particularly desirable in works with an insufficiently descriptive title which treat of several subjects, for which under each heading will be given its appropriate part of the contents. For example, Hugo's " Jus civile Antejustinianeum " contains the originals of Antejustiniau law, but this does not appear from its title, and if it did, it would be hardly worth while to save a few lines by obliging the reader to turn to Hugo to ascertain just what is in the book. On the other hand, the contents of Pertz's "Monumenta Germaniae historica" is so long that only Fullest can aiford to give it under Germany as well as under Pertz. In such a case the reader feels it to be more reasonable that he should be referred. The contents is often more useful under subject-heading than under author; but it is best that there should be one uniform place where it can always be found, and where the whole of it can be found, and that place should be the author-catalogue. 201. Put into notes (in small type) that information which is not given in the title but is required to be given by the plan of the catalogue. NOTES. REFERENCES. 79 Notes have several objects : 1. To give any information about the author, the form of his name, his pseudo- nyms, etc., about the different editions or places of publication, or about the gaps in a set (especially of periodicals), which can not be included in the title without making it disproportionately long. Short, especially if without imprints, can get many of these into the title ; which it is well to do, for a short note is not economical. 2. To explain the title or correct any misapprehension to which it might lead. In a popular library the boys take out " The cruise of the Betsy," imagining it to be an- other " Cruise of the Midge." 3. To direct the attention of persons not familiar with literature to the best books. The main principles of such annotating are simple, (a. ) The notes should characterize the best books only ; to insert them under every author would only confuse and weary ; if few they will arrest attention much better. Dull books and morally bad books should be left in obscurity. Under some of the poorer works which have attained unmerited popularity a brief protest may be made ; it will probably be ineffectual ; but it can do no harm to call Miihlbach unreliable or Tupper commonplace. (6. ) They should be brief and pointod. Perhaps after this direction it is necessary to add that they should be true. 4. To lay out courses of reading for that numerous class who are desirous of " im- proving their minds," and are willing to spend considerable effort and time but know neither where to begin or how to go on. 5. To state what is the practice of the catalogue in the entry of the publications of Congress, Parliament, Academies, Societies, etc., the notes to be made under those words. F. REFERENCES. 202. In references use the word See when there is no entry under the heading from which the reference is made ; See also when there is one. Ex. Death penalty. See Capital punishment. Horticulture. LINDLEY, J. Theory of H. See also Flowers ; — Fruit. Not Vide ; the language of an English catalogue should be English. 203. References must be brief. Yet the convenience of the public must not be sacrificed to brevity. If, for instance, several authors had used the same pseudonym, the titles of their respective works should be given in the references that the reader may know under which of the authors he will find the work he is in search of, and not have to turn to all three. Detlef, Carl, pseud. See Baur, C. is the usual form of reference ; but it is not enough for Hamilton. Hamilton, pseud. Essay on a congress of nations. See Whitman, G. H. Hamilton, pseud. Hamilton. No. 1, etc. See Carey, M. Analytical references to treatises of the same author or on the same subject, con- tained in different volumes of the same work, may be made thus: Charles, A. O. Reformatory and refuge union. (In National Assoc. From. Soc. Sci. Trans., ISiiO.) — Reformatory legislation. (In Trans., 1861.) — Punishment and reformation in America. (In Trans., 1863.) Comets. PEIRCE, B. Connection of comets with the solar system. (In Amer. Assoc., Proc., v. 2. 1850.) — HUBBARD, J. S. Biela's double comet. (In v. 8.) — KIRKWOOD, D. Mean distances of the periodic comet. (In v. 12. 1859.) The signs <^ ^> have been used instead of ( ) in analytical references to mean " contained in." They are more conspicuous, — unnecessarily so. 80 STYLE: REFEKENCES, LANGUAGE, CAPITALS. References are frequently printed in smaller type than the rest of the catalogue. This is well when there are enough not to be overlooked ; but a single reference from one form of a name to another, or from one subject-name to its synonym, should be in the title type, not in the note type, e. g. Bell, Acton, pseud. See Bronte, Aiine. Gardening. See Horticulture. Similarly notes explaining the practice of the catalogue (§$ 61, 201 no. 5) should be made typographically conspicuous. G. LANGUAGE. 204. The language of the compiler's part of an English catalogue should be English. Therefore all notes, explanations, and such words as in, see, see also, note, contents, and (between joint authors), and others, n. p., n. d., should be English; however, etc., q. v., and sic may be used. For the language of HEADINGS, see §§ 27-36. In the entry of Government publi- cations the name of the country or city will have the English form (§§ 33, 34), but the name of the department should usually be in the language of the country, e. g. : Italy. Ministero di Agricoltura. But for countries like Russia, Turkey, Japan, where the vernacular name could not easily be ascertained, an English form may be used. For titles see §§ 165-169, 175 ; put the specifications of the EDITION in the language of the title, also the IMPRINT (§ 179), CONTENTS, NOTES, and REFERENCES. H. CAPITALS. 205. In English use an initial capital 1. for the first word, a. of every sentence, b. of every title quoted, c. of every alternative title, 2. for all proper names a. of persons and places, ^ 6 of bodies I eac^ separate word not an article c. of noted events and periods,] or Imposition. N. B. This does not include names of genera, species, etc., in the animal and vegetable kingdoms, which in an ordinary catalogue should not be capitalized ; as digitalis purpurea, raia batis, the horse. 3. for adjectives and other derivatives from proper names when they have a direct reference to the person, place, etc., from which they are derived*. 4. for titles of honor standing instead of a proper name. Ex. 16. Reply to the Essay on the discovery of America. Ic. Institutio legalis ; or, Introduction to the laws of England. But it is bet- ter, when the sense will permit, to omit the "or" and consider the second title as a clause explanatory of the first, as Institutio legalis ; introduc- tion to the laws of England. 26. Society for Promoting the Diffusion of Useful Knowledge. 2c. Boston Massacre, French Revolution, Gunpowder Plot, Middle Ages. 4. The Earl of Derby, but John Stanley, earl of Derby. CAPITALS. PUNCTUATION 81 206. lu foreign languages, use initial capitals 5. for la, 16, Ic. 6. (Persons and places) a. In German and Danish for every noun and for adjectives derived from names of persons, but for no others. 6. In the Romance languages (Italian, French, Spanish, Portuguese) and in Swedish and Greek lor proper names of persons and places, but not for adjectives derived from them. c. in Latin and Dutch for proper names and also for the adjectives derived from them, but not for common nouns. 7. (Bodies) as in English, except that in German and Danish only the nouns are to be capitalized, and adjectives when they begin the name. 8. (Events and periods) as in English, with the same exception. 9. (Titles) in German and Danish, but not in the Romance languages, in Latin or in Greek. Ex. fia. Die Homerische Frage, but Die griecbischen Scholien. In many German books capitals are not used even for adjectives derived from personal names. Oft. Lea Francais, but le peuple francais. 7. Societe" de 1'Histoire de France. 8. Le Moyen Age, la Revolution Francaise, Die franzosische Revolution. The French, however, now generally print le moyen age, la revolution frau- caise. Capitals are to be avoided, because in the short sentences of which a catalogue consists they confuse rather than help the eye. For this rea- son it is better not to capitalize names in natural history whether English or Latin (bee, rana pipieus, liliacea?, etc.)- Several libraries following the lead of the Congress catalogue have discarded capitals for German nouns. Grimm's authority is alleged in justification, but Grimm's example is followed by a very small minority even of German scholars, and the titles so printed still have an awkward look to most readers. The Boston Public Library also goes to an extreme in its avoidance of capitals, not using them for such proper names as methodists, protestant episcopal church, royal society, etc. The names of languages are not to be capitalized in the Romance languages, as "traduit de 1'anglais," "in francese." Titles of honor are not to be capitalized in the Romance languages, as comte, conte, marchese. But^J/OMsiewr, Madame, Signor, Don, Donna always begin with capitals. Use capitals (or, better, small capitals) for numbers after the names of kings (Charles in. or Henry iv.) and for single-letter abbreviations (A. D., B. C., H. M. S., F.R. S. E., etc., or A. D.,F. R. s. E., etc.). Butu. p. no place, n. t. p. no title-page, may be in lower-case letters or small capitals, audb. born, d. died, ms. manuscript, should be in lower case. H. PUNCTUATION, ETC. 207. Let each entry consist of four (or five) sentences : 1. the heading, Cicero, Marcus Tullius. 2. the title, including editors > Brutus de Claris oratoribus ; erkl. and translators, f von O. Jahu. 3. the edition, 2e Aufl. 4892 LI 6 82 STYLE : PUNCTUATION, ETC. 4. the imprint, as given by i the book, } Berlm- 1856' 5. the part of the imprint » added by the cataloguer, J Which, if not the first title under Cicero, would read : — Brutus de claris oratoribus ; erkl. von O. Jahn. 2e Aufl. Berlin, 1856. O. Separate by a ; the title proper from the phrase relating to the editor, translator, etc. This requires a minimum of capitals. It will occasionally happen that the title can not be thrown into one sentence, but that should al\v«ays be done when pos- sible. It is usual to separate 4 and 5. The French, however, make one sentence of them (Paris, 1864, in-12). This has the advantage of agreeing with the best form of quoting a title ("see his Memoirs, London, 1874, O. in which," etc.). It is useless for one who abridges titles to make any attempt to follow the punctuation. The spell- ing should be retained, but it is hardly worth while for Short or Medium to imitate the old printers in their indiscriminate use of i and j, u and v. A library may have a collection of books or a few volumes which from their rarity deserve to be catalogued with every bibliographical uicety, with the most exact copying of punctuation, spelling, and forms of letters, and even with marks to show where the lines of the title end. Such collections are the Prince and the Ticknor books in the Boston Public Library, such single books are fifteeners or the rarest Americana. Yet it may be questioned whether a library does well to redescribe books already fully described by Hain, Harrisse, Thiele, Trommel, Stevens, or Sabin. A simple reference to these works will generally suffice (§ 261). 208. Supply the proper accents if they are not given in the title. In French and Greek titles printed in capitals the accents are often omitted. In the titles of rare books, copied exactly, accents should not be supplied. 209. Use [ ] only for words added to the title, and ( ) to express inclusion. Ex. Talbot, E. A. Five years' residence in Canada, [1818-23]. Maguire, J. F. Canada. (In Ms Irish in America. 1868.) Bale, J. Kinge John, a play; ed. by J. P. Collier. Westm., 1838. 4°. (Cam- den Soc., v. 2.) ?10. If any title contains [ ] or ( ) omit them, using commas instead. One sign should never be used to express two things, if that can be avoided ; each should have one definite meaning. Also alter — into , or ; or . as the context may require. 211. Use italics for the words See or See also in references, In and In his in analyticals, and for Same, Note, Contents, and Namely, and for etc. when used to indicate omission of part of the title, also for subdivisions of subjects (as France, History). 212. In long Contents make the division of the volumes plain either by heavy-faced volume-numbers or by giving each volume a sepa- rate paragraph. Anyone will recoil from the labor of looking through a.long undivided mass of small type ; moreover the reader ought to be able to determine at once in what volume any article whose title he is reading is contained. ARRANGEMENT. 83 i. ARRANGEMENT.* 213. Arrange entries according to the English alphabet, whatever the order of the alphabet in which a foreign name might have to be entered in its original language. Treat I and J, U and V, as separate letters ; ij, at least in the older Dutch names, should be arranged as y; do not put Spanish names beginning with Ch, LI, IJ", after all other names beginning with C, L, and N, as is done by the Spanish Academy, nor a, a, ae, 6, 0 at the end of the alphabet, as is done by the Swedes and Danes, nor the German a, 6, ii, as if written ae, oe, ue (except Goethe). If two names are spelled exactly alike except for the umlaut (as Mtiller and Muller) arrange by the forenames. 1. HEADINGS. 214. When the same word serves for several kinds of heading let/ the order be the following : person, place, followed by subject (ex- cept person or place), form, and title. Arrangement must be arbitrary. This order is easy to remember, because it fol- lows the course of cataloguing ; we put down first the author, then the title. The subject and form, expressed sometimes in more than one word, aud the title, almost always having more than one word, must be arranged among themselves by the usual rules. Of course, the person considered as a subject can not be separated from the person as author. As the place may be either author or subject or both, it may come between the two. Ex. Washington, George, (person) Washington, D. C. (place) Homes. (subject) Homes and shrines, (title) 215. Forenames used as headings precede surnames. Homes, H. A. (person) Homes family. (persons) Ex. Christian n. Christian, James. Christian art. Francis n. Francis, Abraham. Francis aud Jane. 216. Headings like Charles, George, Henry, when very numerous, must be divided into classes, in this order : Saints, Popes, Emperors, Kings, Princes and Noblemen, others. The Saints are sub- arranged by their usual appellatives, the Popes by their number, Sovereigns and Sovereign princes in alphabetical order of coun- tries, and under countries numerically. Other persons are subar- ranged by their usual appellatives, neglecting the prepositions.1 Ex. Peter, Saint. Peter, Pope. Peter the Great, Emperor of Russia. Peter n. of Ar agon. Peter in. of Aragon. • Peter i. of Portugal. Peter, Duke of Neivcaxtle. Peter, of Groningen, enthusiast. See Pieter. Peter, John Henry. Peter, Lake. Peter, Mt. Peter Lewis, a true tale, Peter-Hansen, Erik. 1 So that Thomas de Insula and Thomas Insulanus may not be separated. When there are two appellatives coming in different parts of the alphabet, refer from the rejected one, as Thomas Cantuariensis. See Thomas Beeket. *0n this subject consult Appendix IV, pp. 116-138; also p. 36-69 of Dr. C: Dziatzko's "Instruction fiir die Ordnung der Titel im alphabetischen Zettelkatalog der Univ.-Bibliothek zn Breslau, Berlin, 1886," 74 pp. 0 (the first 35 pp. are a treatise on Entry). 84 STYLE: ARRANGEMENT OF HEADINGS. 217. Arrange proper names beginning with M', Me, £t., Ste. as if spelled Mac, Saint, Sainte. Because they are so pronounced. But L' is not arranged as La or Le, nor O' as if it stood for Of, because they are not so pronounced. 218. In a card catalogue mix in one alphabet names that difl'er slightly in spelling and come close together in the alphabet. Ex. Clark and Clarke, and the French names beginning with Saint and Sainte. The names should be spelled correctly, but the difference of spelling disregarded by the arranger. But the exceptional order should be clearly indicated. A guide block should have the inscription Clark and Clarke, and there should be a reference guide block, Clarke. See Clark. The most common spelling should go first ; if the forms are equally used, let that precede that comes first in alphabetical order. 219. Arrange by the forename headings in which the family name is the same. No attention is to be paid to prefixes, as Bp., Capt., Dr., Hon., Sir, Fra'ulein, Miss, Mile., Mme., Mrs., or to suffixes, as D.D., F.E.S., LL. D., etc. In regard to Hun- garian names, observe that the name appears on the title-page as it does in a catalogue, the family name first, followed by the Christian name ; as, " Elbesze'le'sek ; irta ba"r6 Eotvos Jozsef. 220. When the forenames are the same arrange chronologically. Again, no attention is to be paid to the titles Sir, etc. The alphabetical principle is of no use here because no one can know beforehand which of many possible titles we have taken to arrange by, whereas some one may know when the author whom he is seeking lived. Of course Brown, T. L., comes before Brown, Thomas, for the same reason that Brown comes before Browne. 221. Forenames not generally used should be neglected in the arrange- ment. When an author is generally known by one of several forenames he will be looked for by that alone, and that alone should determine the arrangement, at least in a card catalogue. Instances are: Agassiz, (J:) L: (Rudolph), Cleveland, (Stephen) Grover, Collins, (W:) Wilkie, Cook, (Flavins Josephus known as) Joseph, Dobson, (H:) Austin, Dore, (Paul) Gustav. The form should be Harte, Bret (full name Francis Bret), or Harte, Bret (in full Francis Bret). Make references whenever the omission of a name will change the alphabetical ar- rangement, as from Muller, F: Max, to Miiller. Max. But if they are counted in arranging they should be spaced or parenthesized, because when there are several persons with the same family name the spacing or parenthesizing assists the eye in picking out the right one. Thus if we have Franklin, John, d. 1759, Franklin, Sir John, d. 1863, Franklin, John Andrew, Franklin, John Charles, Franklin, John David, the reader not knowing of the name David would expect to find the last among the simple Johns, but seeing the David spaced would understand that it was a rarely used name. This supposes that he knows the system, but one can not have a con- densed catalogue without obliging the reader to learn how to use it. (See § 140.) ARRANGEMENT OF HEADINGS. 85 222. If an author uses both the shorter and the longer forms in differ- ent works and yet is decidedly better known by the shorter, arrange by that. Ex. Mtiller, Max (ire full F: Max). Otherwise give and arrange by all the names. 223. If a person's forenames occur differently in different books or dif- ferent authorities, or occur in a different order, or the person has changed one or more of his forenames, arrange by one form (the best known or the latest) and refer from the others if alphabeti- cally separated. 224. Arrange a nobleman's title, under which entry is made, and the name of a bishop's see, from which reference is made to the fam- ily name, among the personal names, not with the places. Ex. London, London, London, London, London, not London, London, London, nor London, London, London, London, Alfred. David, Bp. of. John . Conn. Eng. John. David, Bp. of. Conn. John. Conn. David, Bp. of. Eng. Danby, John. Danby, Thomas Osborne, Earl of. Danby, Wm. Danby, £"71*7. Holland, C. Holland, H: E. Fox- Vassal, 4 th Baron. Holland, H: R. Fox- Vassal, 3d Baron. Holland [the country]. Bride of Lammermoor. Brides and bridals. Bride's choice. 225. The possessive case singular should be arranged with the plural. The alphabet demands this, and I see no reason to make an exception which can not be made in foreign languages. Boys' and girls' book. Boy's King Arthur. Boys of '76. 226. Arrange Greek and Latin personal names by their patronymics or other appellatives. Ex. Dionysius. Diouysius Areopagita. Dionysius Chalcidensis. Dionysius Genuensis. 227. Arrange English personal names compounded with prefixes as sin- gle words ; also those foreign names in which the prefix is not transposed (see § 24). Ex. Demonstration. De Montfort. Demophilus. De Morgan. Demosthenes. Other such names are Ap Thomas, Des Barres, Dn Chaillu, Fitz Allen, La Motte Fouque", Le Sage, Mac Fingal, O'Neal, Saint-Re'al, Sainte-Beuve, Van Buren. This is the universal custom, founded on the fact that the prefixes are often not separated in printing from the following part of the name. It would, of course, be wrong to have Demorgan in one place and De Morgan in another. 86 STYLE: ARRANGEMENT OF HEADINGS 228. Arrange personal names compounded of two names with or with- out a hyphen after the first name but before the next longer word. Ex. Fonte, Bart. de. Fonte Resbecq, Auguste. Fontenay, Louis. Fontenay Mareuil, Francois. 229. In the preliminary card catalogue it is best to arrange these by the first name, neglecting the second entirely1 and subarrauging by forenames. The reason is (1) that authors do not always use the second part of their names, and (2) that the single alphabet is easier to use in a card catalogue. Ex. Halliwell (afterivards Halliwell-Fhillipps), James Orchard. 1 Except when the first family names and forenames of two persons are the same, when the one with a second part will come after the other; but if both have a sec- ond part, subarrauge by these second parts when they differ. 230. Arrange compound names of places as separate words. Ex. New, Johij. not New", John. New Hampshire. New legion of Satan. New legion of Satan. Newark. New Sydenham Society. Newfoundland. New York. New Hampshire. Newark. Newspapers. Newfoundland. New Sydenham Society, Newspapers. New York. 231. Arrange names of societies as separate words. See New Sydenham Society in the list above. 232. Arrange as single words compound words which are printed as one. Ex. Bookseller, Bookplates. Sometimes such words are printed on title-pages as two words; in such case do the same in copying the title, but if the word is used as a heading follow the authority of a dictionary ; each library should select some one dictionary as its standard. 233. Arrange hyphened words as if separate. Ex. Happy home. Happy-Thought Hall. Happy thoughts. Home and hearth. Home rule. Homely traits. Homer. Sing, pseud. Sing, James. Sing, James, pseud. Sing-Sing Prison. Singapore. Singing. Grave and Reverend Club. Grave County. Grave Creek. Grave-digger. Grave-mounds. Grave objections. Grave de Mezeray, Autoine. Gravel. Gravestone. Graveyard. Out and about. Out in the cold, a song. Out-of-door Parliament. Outer darkness, The. ARRANGEMENT OF HEADINGS. 87 234. Arrange pseudonyms after the corresponding real name. Ex. Andrew, pseud. Andrew, St. Andrew, St.,})seud. Andrew, John. Andrew, John, pseud. Andrew, John Albion. 235. Arrange incomplete names by the letters. If the same letters are followed by different signs, if there are no forenames, arrange in the order of the complexity of signs ; but if there are forenames arrauge by them. Ex. Far from the world. Far. . . Far*** Far**', B.F. Far. . . , J. B. Farr, John. 236. If signs without any letters are used as headings (§ 57) (as ... or 1 1 1) put them all before the first entries under the letter A. 237. The arrangement of title-entries is first by the heading words ; if they are the same, then by the next word ; if that is the same, by the next; and so on. Every word, articles and prepositions included, is to be regarded ; but not a transposed article. Ex. Uncovenanted mercies. Under a cloud. Under the ban. Under the greenwood tree ; a novel. Under the greenwood tree; a poem. Under which king. Undone task, The. Undone task done. Here the trausposed The is non-existent for the arranger. It makes uo difference whether the words are connected with one another in sense or not; the searcher should not be compelled to think of that. Let the arrangement be by words as ordinarily printed. Thus Home rule is one idea but it is two words, and its place must be determined primarily by its first word Home, which brings it before Homeless. If it were printed Homerule it would come after Homeless. Similarly Art amateur is one phrase, but as the first word Art is followed by a word beginning with am, it must come before Art and artists, although its parts are more closely connected than the parts of the latter phrase. The French d' and 1' are not to be treated as part of the following word : Ex. Art d'e"conomiser. not Art de faire. Art d'etre grandpere. Art de liuguistique. Art d'instruire. Art de 1'iustruction. Art de faire. Art d'e"conomiser. Art de 1'iustruction. Art des mines. Art de linguistique. Art d'etre grandpere. Art des mines. Art digne. Art digne. Art d'instruire. I 88 STYLE: ARRANGEMENT OF HEADINGS AND TITLES. 238. Arrange titles beginning with numeral figures (not expressing the number of the work in a series, § 244) as if the figures were written out in the language of the rest of the title. Ex. 100 deutscher Manner = Ein huudert deutsche Manner ; 1812 = Mil huit cent douze. 239. Arrange abbreviations as if spelled in full ; but elisions as they are printed. Ex. Dr., M., Mile., Mrae., Mr., Mrs., as Doctor, Monsieur, etc. But Who'd be a king ? Who killed Cock Robin? Who's to blame ? CF'The arrangement recommended in §§ 227-232 suits the eye best and requires as little knowledge or thought as any to use. The exception made in § 227 is required by universal practice and by the fact that a very large part of the personal names beginning with prefixes are commonly printed as one word. Names of places begin- ning with New, Old, Red, Blue, Green, etc. (which might be likened to the prefixes Do, Dos, Du, etc., and made the ground of a similar exception), are much less fre- quently printed as one, and when they are the accent is different. Moreover the words New, Old, etc., have an independent meaning and occur as personal names, first words of titles, or of the names of societies, as in the examples in } 230. The reason for separating New Hampshire and Newark in the first example is patent to every con- suiter at a glance ; the reason for the different positions of New legion and New York in the second example would not be clear and would have to be thought out; and it is not well to demand thought from those who use the catalogue if it can be avoided. 2. TITLES. 240. Under an author's name adopt the following order: (1) Complete (or nearly complete) works, (2) Extracts from the complete works, (3) Single works, whether by him alone or written in conjunction with another author, (4) Works about him. Nos. 1-3 come first as belonging to the author-catalogue ; 4 comes last as belonging to the subject-catalogue. It is better to let the smaller collections come in their alphabetical place with the single works. The single works of a voluminous author (as Aristotle, Cicero, Homer, Shakespere) should be so printed that the different titles will strike the eye readily. If the "contents" of the collected words are not printed alphabetically, it is well to insert under the titles of the chief single works a reference to the particular vol- umes of the collections in which they are to be found. (See Boston Athenaeum catal., art. Goethe.) Two works published together are arranged by the first title, with reference from the second. Extracts from single works come immediately after the respective works. A spurious work is arranged with the single works, but with a note stating the spuriousness. But if the author's name is used as a pseudonym the entry should have a separate heading after all the works; as, Browne, H. History. Browne, H., pseud. Stones from the old quarry. See Ellison, H. If there are only two joint authors both may appear in the heading, but the entry should be arranged among the works written by the first author alone ; if there are more than two the heading may be made in the form Smith, John, and others. The usual practice hitherto has been to arrange entries by joint authors after the works written by the first author alone, and this was recommended in the first edition in regard both to the form of the heading and the arrangement ; but although it is pleas- ing to a classifying mind, it is practically objectionable because a reader, not know- ing that the book he is looking for is a joint production, and not finding it in the first ARRANGEMENT OF TITLES. 89 series of titles, may suppose that it is not in the library. This clanger is greatest in a card catalogue, where it entirely overweighs the somewhat visionary advantage of the separate arrangement. The arrangement of a card catalogue should be as simple as possible, because the reader having only one card at a time under his eyes can not easily see what the arrangement is. On the printed page, where he takes in many titles at a glance, more classification can be ventured upon ; there the danger is con- fined to the more voluminous authors; where there are few titles the cousulter will read them all and so will not miss any. On the printed page, too, the mixing in of joint. authors interrupts to the eye the alphabetical order of titles ; e. g., Dod, T. Anamites and their country. — and others. Barraconta. — Carriboo, a voyage to the interior. — and 'White, E. Dahomey and the slave trade. — Elephanta, its caves and their images. This trifling inconvenience can be easily avoided, however, by including the sec- ond name in the title; e. g., Dod, T. Auauiites. — Barracouta, by D. [and othersj. — Carriboo. — Dahomey, by Dod and E. White. — Elephauta. When the form Smith, John, and others is used, Full will give a list of the "others" in a note. They are not put into a heading merely because there is not room for many names on the first line of a card, and in a printed catalogue the information seems more in place in a note than in a very long heading. 241. In the order of titles take account of every word except initial articles. If two titles have the same words arrange by date of imprint, the earliest first. Ex. Address of Southern delegates in Congress. Address of the people of Great Britain. Address of twenty thousand loyal Protestant apprentices. Address on national education. Address to a provincial bashaw. Address to Christians, recommending the distribution Husson, F. Vie d'une grande dame. — Vie dans le Sahel. Mason, T. The corner stone. — A wall of defence. 242. Arrange different editions of the same works chronologically. Ex. Homerus. Carmina [Gr.]; cumannot., cur. C. G. Heyne. Lips., 1802. 8v. 8°. — Same. [Gr.]; cum nous et proleg. R. P. Knight. Londiui, 1820. 4°. — Same. [Gr. j; ed. J. Bekker. Bonnae, 1858. 2 v. 8°. Bartlett, John. Collection of familiar quotations. 3ded. Camb.,1860. 12°. - Same. 4th ed. Boston, 1863. 12°. — Same. 8th ed. Boston, 1882. 16°. 243. Undated editions should have the date supplied as nearly as may be ; absolutely undatable editions should precede dated editions. 241. Disregard numerals commencing a title before such words as Re- port, Annual report. Not First report, but General account Fourth report, 1st, 2d, 4th report. General account, Second report. 90 STYLE: ARRANGEMENT OF TITLES 245. Arrange translations immediately after the original, prefixing the name of the language into which they are* made ; if there are several, arrange the languages alphabetically. Ex. Cicero. De officiis. [Various editions, arranged chronologically.] — Some. Erkl. von O. Heine. Berlin, 1857. 8°. — Eng. Offices ; tr. by C. R. Edmonds. London, 1850. 8°. — French. Les offices ; tr. par [G. Dubois]. Paris, 1691. 8°. If the original is not in the library the translation may be arranged either by the first words of its own title or by the first words of the original title prefixed in brack- ets. The latter order is to be preferred when most of the other titles are in the orig- inal language. When the list of entries is long a reference should be made from any title of a translation which is alphabetically much separated from its original back to the original title under which it is to be found. Ex. Hoflaiid, Mrs. B. (W. H.). [The son of a genius. French:"] Ludovico; tr. par Mme. de Montolieu. Dudevant. L'homme de neige. — Eng. The snow man. [58 titles interposed.] — The snow man. See, back, L'homme de neige. An original text with a translation is to be arranged as if alone, but if there are many editions make a reference from among the translations to the original. If there are translations into two languages in a volume, arrange by the first, and, if neces- sary, refer from the second. Polyglots precede all other editions. 246. Divide the works about a person when numerous by collecting the titles of lives into a group. 247. When a writer is voluminous insert the criticisms or notes on or replies to each work after its title; otherwise give them accord- ing to § 240, at the end of the article. 248. Arrange aualyticals, when there are several for the same article, chronologically, as being different editions. Ex. Pretty, F. Prosperous voyage of Sir T. Cavendish. (In Purchas, S. Pil- grims, v. 1, b. 2. 1625; — Harris, J. Col., v. 1. 1705; and v. 1. 1764; — Callan- der.J. Terra Austr.,v. 1. 1768; — Hakluyt, R. Col., v. 4. 1811.) 249. If the library has a work both as part of another work and inde- pendently, arrange in the probable order of publication. Ex. Cutter, C: A. Common sense in libraries. (In Library journal, v. 14. 1889.) — Same. (In American Library Assoc. Proceedings at St. Louis, 1889.) — Same, separated. - Same. [Boston, 1889.] Q. 250. Under countries arrange titles as under any other author. That is, put first the country's own works (governmental publications), then the works about the country; and as we put the criticisms on a voluminous author after the separate writings to which they respectively apply, so we put accounts of or attacks upon any branch of government after the entry of the branch. 251. In arranging government publications make all necessary divisions but avoid subdivision. ARRANGEMENT OF TITLES. 91 It is much clearer — and it is the dictionary plan — to make the parts of a. division themselves independent divisions, referring from the including division to the sub- ordinate one. E. g. (to take part of the headings under United States): Subordination. Better order. r Adj utant-General. Bureau of Engineers. Bureau of Indian Affairs. Bureau of Navigation. Bureau of Navy Yards and Docks. Bureau of Topographical Engi- neers. Commissary-General. Department of the Interior. Department of the Navy. Department of War. Freedmen's Bureau. Hydrographic Office. Military Academy. Naval Academy. Naval Asylum. Naval Observatory. Patent Office. Pension Office. Public Lands. United States. Department of the In- U. S. terior. Bureau of Indian Af- fairs. Patent Office. Pension Office. Public Land Office. Department of the Navy. Bureau of Navigation. Hydrographi c Office. Naval Academy. Naval Observatory. Bureau of Navy-Yards and Docks. Naval Asylum. Department of War. Adjutant-General'sOf- fice. Bureau of Engineers. Bureau of Topograph- ical Engineers. Commissary-General's Office. Freedmen's Bureau. Military Academy. The subordination of bureaus and offices to departments is adopted simply for con- venience, and is changed from time to time as the exigencies of the public service demand. There is no corresponding convenience in preserving such an order in a catalogue, but inconvenience, especially in the case of the above-mentioned changes. The alphabetical arrangement has here all its usual advantages without its usual disadvantage of wide separation. 252. Insert a synopsis of the arrangement whenever there are enough titles under a heading to require it. This applies chiefly to the larger countries (as France, Great Britain, United Staters), the more voluminous authors (as Cicero, Shakespeare), one title-entry (Bible), and possibly some subjects not national. The arrangement of titles under Bible will be governed by §§ 240, 242, 245, and 247; but it can be best understood from an example in some catalogue which has many titles under that heading. The synopsis in the Boston Athenaeum catalogue is as follows: Whole Bibles (first Polyglots, then single languages arranged alphabetically). Works illustrating the whole Bible (under the heads Analysis, Antiquities, Bibli- ography, Biography, Canon, Catechisms, historical and theological, Commentaries, Concordances, Criticism, Dictionaries, Evidences, authority, etc., Geography, Herme- neutics, History, Inspiration, Introductions, Natural history, Science and the Bible, Theology, morals, etc., Miscellaneous illustrative works). Selections from both Testaments. Prophetical books of both Testaments. Old Testament. Illustrative works. 92 STYLE: ARRANGEMENT OF CONTENTS. Parts of the Old Testament (arranged in the order of the English version), and works severally illustrating them, Apocrypha. New Testament. Illustrative works. Parts of the New Testament, and works illustrating them. Under each part the order is: Editions of the original texts chronologically ar- ranged ; — Versions, in the alphabetical order of the languages ; — Illustrative works. 3. CONTENTS. 253. Arrange contents either in the order of the volumes or alphabetic- ally by the titles of the articles. Volume order. Contents. Vol. 1. Musaeus, a monody to the memory of Mr. Pope. — Odes, son- nets, epitaphs and inscriptions, elegies. — The English garden. — Religio clerici. — Hymns and psalms. 2. Elfrida, a dra- matic poem. — Caractacus, a dramatic poem. — Sappho. — Argentile and Curan, a legendary drama. — Pygmalion, a lyrical scene. 3. Du Fresnoy's art of painting. — Dryden's preface to his translation of Du Fresnoy. — Chronological list of painters to 1689. — Essays on English church mu- sic. 4* Sermons. — Essay on the meaning of the word angel, as used by St. Paul. — Examination of the prophecy in Matthew 24th. Alphabetical order. Contents. Argentile and Curan ; a legend- ary drama, v. 2. Art of painting, by Du Fresnoy, v. 3. Caractacus ; a dramatic poem, v. 2. Chronological list of painters to 1689, v. 3. Dryden's preface to his transla- tion of Du Fresuoy, v. 3. Elegies, v. 1. Elfrida ; a dramatic poem, v. 2. English garden, The, v. 1. Epitaphs and inscriptions, v. 1. Essay on the meaning of the word angel, as used by St. Paul, v. 4. Essays on English church music, v. 3. Examination of the prophecy in Matthew 24th, v. 4. Hymns and psalms, v. 1. Musseus : a monody to the mem- ory of Mr. Pope, v. 1. Odes, v. 1. Pygmalion ; a lyrical scene, v. 2. Religio clerici, v. 1. Sappho ; a lyrical drama, v. 2. Sermons, \. 4. Sonnets, v. 1. It is evident how much much more compendious the second method is. But there is no reason why an alphabetical "contents" should not be run into a single para- graph. The titles of novels and plays contained in any collection ought to be entered in the. main alphabet ; it is difficult then to see the advantage of an alphabetical ar- rangement of the same titles under the collection. Many other collections are com- posed of works for which alphabetical order is no gain, because the words of their titles are not mnemonic words, and it is not worth while to take the trouble of ar- ranging them ; but there are others composed of both classes', in which such order is very convenient. ARRANGEMENT OF SUBJECTS. 9i> 4. SUBJECTS. 254. Care must be taken not to mix two subjects together because their names are spelled in the same way. Thus Grace before meals, Grace of body, Grace the musical term, and Grace the theological term, must be four distinct headings. 255. Under subject-heading's group titles topically when it can be done, otherwise arrange them by the authors' names. Alphabetical arrangement by authors' names is useful when a subject-entry is a substitute for a title-entry, but otherwise is as useless as it is inappropriate. If the author's name is known the book should be looked for under that, not under the sub- ject ; if it is not known, what good can an arrangement by authors do? Sometimes, if one has forgotten the Christian name of an author, it may be easier to find him under a subject than in a crowd of Smiths or Joneses or Mullers, and this use of a subject-heading is impaired by grouping or by chronological order; but such use is infrequent, and the main design of a subject-entry should not be subordinated to this side advantage. It is even urged that it is harder to find a work treating of the subject in any special way among subdivisions than when there is only one alphabet, which is absurd. On the one hand one must look over a list of books embracing five or six distinct divis- ions of a subject and select from titles often ambiguous or provokingly uncommuni- cative those that seem likely to treat of the matter in the way desiied. On the other plan he must run over five or six headings given by another man, and representing that man's ideas of classification, and decide under which of them the treatise he is in search of is likely to be put. Which system gives the least trouble and demands the least brain-work ? Plainly the latter. In three cases out of four he can compre- hend the system at a glance. And if in the fourth there is a doubt, aud he is com- pelled after all to look over the whole list or several of the divisions, he is no worse off than if there were no divisions ; the list is not any longer. The objection then to subdivisions is not real, but fanciful. The reader at first glance is frightened by the appearance of a system to be learned, and perversely regards it as a hinderance in- stead of an assistance. But if anyone has such a rooted aversion to subdivisions it is very easy for him to disregard them altogether, and read the list as if they were not there, leaving them to be of service to wiser men. As the number of titles under each heading increases in number so does the oppor- tunity and need of division. The first and most usual groups to be made are Bibliog- raphy and its companion History, and the " practical-form" groups Dictionaries and Periodicals Under countries the first grouping will be Description and Travels, His- tory and Politics, Language and Literature, followed by Natural history, etc. For exam- ples of further subdivisions see the longer catalogues. It is not worth while in a printed catalogue to make very minute divisions. The object aimed at, — enabling the enquirer to find quickly the book that treats of the branch of the subject which he is interested in, — is attained if the mass of titles is broken up into sections containing from half a dozen to a score. Of course there are masses of titles which can not be so broken up because they all treat of the same subject in the same way, or at least show no difference of treatment that admits of classification. The general works on the Fine Arts in a library of 100,000 volumes may number 100 titles, even after Peri- odicals and Dictionaries have been set aside. There is one objection to grouping, — that books can seldom be made to fill any classi- fication exactly, their contents overrunning the classes, so that they must be entered in several places, or they will fail to be found under some of the subdivisions of which they treat. Thus in the chronological arrangement of History, whether we arrange by the first date, the average, or the last date of each work, the books cover periods of such various length that one can never get all that relates to one period together. 94 STYLE: ARRANGEMENT OP SUBJECTS. There is another objection, — that it is much harder to make a catalogue with sub- divisions, which of course require a knowledge of the subject and examination of the books; and the difficulty increases in proportion to the number of the books and the minuteness of the di visions. 256. The subarrangemeut in groups will often be alphabetical by au- thors ; but in groups or subjects of a historical character it should be chronological, the order being made clear by putting the dates first or by printing them in heavy-faced type. Thus nnder countries the division History will be arranged according to the period treated of, the earliest first; so under Description, for England as seen by foreigners in the days of Elizabeth was a very different country from the England seen by Prince Piickler-Muskau in 1828, or satirized by Max O'Rell in 1883. So Statistics and Litera- ture, and other divisions, should be treated when they are long enough. 257. When there are many cross-references classify them. Ex. Architecture. See also Arches; — Baths; — Bridges; — Cathedrals; — Fonts; — [and many other things built! ; a ho Carpentry ; — Drawing ; — Metal-work ; — Painting ; — [ and many other means or methods of building] ; also Athens ; — Berlin ; — Boston ; — Milan ; — Rome ; — Venice ; — Verona ; — [and many other cities whose buildings are described]; also Arabia ; — Assyria ; — Egypt ; — France ; — Greece ; — India ; — Italy ; — [and many other countries whose architecture is described]. 258. When the titles are numerous under a subject-heading divide them, but avoid subdivision. It may not be best to adopt strictly the same method in the subdivisions under countries that was recommended for government publications. There are advantages in both the following plans. The second is the dictionary plan pure and simple; the first is a bit of classification introduced for special reasons into a dictionary cata- logue, and perhaps out, of place there. It is, however, the one which I have adopted for the catalogue of the Boston Athenaeum. [Name of Administration, country.] Agriculture. Antiquities. Architecture. Army. Art. Biography. Botany. Calendar. Ceremonies. Charities. Climate. Colonies. Commerce and Trade. Costume. Description and Travels. Ecclesiastical history. Education. Entomology. Finance. Folk-lore. Foreign relations. [Name of Administration, country.] Agriculture. Antiquities. Architecture. Army. Art. Ballads and songs. Bibliography. Botany. Calendar. Ceremonies. Charities. Climate. Colonies. Commerce. Composition. Conversation and Phrases. Correspondence. Costume. Description and Travels. Dialects. Dialogues. AKRANGEMENT OP SUBJECTS. 95 [Name of Geology, country.] Heraldry. Herpetology. History. Bibliography. General works. Chronological arrange- ment. Ichthyology. Industry. Language. Bibliography. General and miscellaneous works. Composition. Conversation and Phrases. Correspondence. Dialects. Dictionaries. Epithets. Etymology. Exercises. Grammar. Historical grammars. History. Homonyms. Pronunciation and spelling. Prosody. Readers (for foreign lan- guages). Rhymes. Synonyms. Law. Bibliography. History. General works. Literature. -Bibliography. History (including lives of authors). Collections. Manuals. i Selections for reading *• and speaking. Ballads and songs. Dialogues. Drama. Eloquence or oratory. Epigrams. Epitaphs. Essays. Fables. Fairy tales. Fiction. Legends. [Name of Dictionaries, country.] Drama. Ecclesiastical history. Education. Eloquence or oratory. Entomology. Etymology. Epigrams. , • Epitaphs. Epithets. Exercises. Fables. Fairy tales. Fiction. Finance. Foreign relations. Geology. Grammar. Heraldry. Herpetology. History. Bibliography. General works. Chronological arrange- ment. Homonyms. Ichthyology. Language. Bibliography. History. General and miscellaneous works. Law. Bibliography. History. General and miscellaneous works. Legends. Letters. Literature. Bibliography. History. General and miscellaneous works. Collections. Malacology. Manufactures. Medicine. Mineralogy. Money. Music. Names. Natural history. Navy. Naval history. 96 STYLE: ARRANGEMENT OF SUBJECTS. [Name of Literature— Continued, country. ] Letters. Parodies. Periodicals. Poetical romances. Poetry. Popular literature.* Prose romances, t Satire. Sonnets. Wit and humor. Malacology. Manufactures. Medicine. Mineralogy. Money. Music. Names. Natural history. Navy. Naval history. Numismatics. Ornithology. Palaeontology. Philosophy. Politics. Population. Public works. Registers. Religion. Sanitary affairs. Science. Social distinctions. Social life, Manners and cus- toms. Social science. Statistics. Technology. Theatre. Theology. Zoology. Etc. Note, howeverj that if the subordination under Language and Literature is objected to, it is very easy to make them independent headings in the maiu alphabet, having instead of the headings [Name of Numismatics, country.] Ornithology. Paleontology. Parodies. Periodicals. Philosophy. Poetical romances. Poetry. Politics. Popular literature. * Population. Pronunciation. Prose romauces.t Prosody. Public works. Registers. Religion. Rhymes. Sanitary affairs. Satire. Science. Social distinctions. Social life, Manners and cus- toms. Social science. Sonnets. Spelling. Statistics. Synonyms. Technology. Theatre. Theology. Wit and humor. Zoology. Etc. Italy. Description. History. Language. Literature. Natural history. Italian language. Italian literature. Italy. Description. History. Natural history. Of course different countries will require different divisious, e. g., Ecclesiastical history, Mythology, Religion, Theology will not often be required for the same coun- * Not meaning novels, but broadsides, chap-books, and the like, — the literature of the people in times past, t Again not meaning novels, but the romances of chivalry, etc. ARRANGEMENT OF SUBJECTS. 97 try. And often it will be expedient to combine those divisions in which there are very few titles into one more general; thus Botany, Herpetology, Ichthyology, Zoology, would join to give Natural history a respectable size, and Geology, Mineralogy, Palaeon- tology, Physical geography would combine, or in very small countries all these would go together under Description. Under some countries other divisions will be required; in the list are given only those in actual use ; but the arrangement is elastic and admits of new divisions whenever they are needed. In regard to a few (such as Epitaphs, Fables, Names, Proverbs) there is room for doubt whether they ought to be under countries; whether the subject cohesion is not much stronger than the national cohesion. Many others are uot usually put here (as Numismatics, Philosophy. Relig- ion, Science, Theology, Zoology). The former usage was to put under the country only its history, travels in it, and the general descriptive works; and books that treated of the Art, Architecture, Ballads, Botany, Drama, etc., of that land were put with the general works on Art, Architecture, etc. But the tendency of the dictionary cat- alogue is towards national classification ; that is, in separating what relates to the parts of a subject, as is required by its specific principle, it necessarily brings together all that relates to a country in every aspect, as it would what relates to any other individual. It may be asked (1) why the parts of Natural history are here separated and the parts of Language aud Literature not; and (2) why we do not divide still more (follow- ing out the dictionary plan fully), so as to have divisions like Liliacere, Cows, Horses. As to (%2), in a library catalogue of a million volumes it would no doubt be best to adopt rigidly this specific mode of entry for the larger countries; for a catalogue of one or two hundred thousand, arrangement in classes is as well suited to quick reference and avoids the loss of room occasioned by numerous headings. With few books rui- uute division has a very incomplete appearance, specialties occurring only here and there, aud most of the titles being those of general works. This may be compared to the division of a library into alcoves. One of from 10,000 to 20,000 volumes has an alcove for Natural History; from 20,000 to 50,000 it has alcoves for Botany and for Zoology ; from 50,000 to 100,000 it has alcoves for Birds, Fishes, Insects, Mammals, Reptiles, but it must be either very large or very special before it allows to smaller divisions of Zoology separate apartments. On an expansive system it is easy to make new alcoves as they are wanted ; a similar multiplication by fission is possible in the successively enlarging editions of a printed catalogue. A card catalogue, designed for continuous growth, should have more thorough division than can be put into print, because it must look into the future, while the printed catalogue has no future. As to (1) I can only say that the divisions of Language seem to me too intimately connected to be dispersed in catalogues of the present size, but that those of Litera- ture have a more substantive existence and ought to be separated sooner. A double subdivision, however, ought to be avoided. Under Language there should be only one alphabet. It is better to arrange Greece. Language. Accents. than Dictionaries. Dictionaries. Etymology. Ellipses. Grammar. Etymology. Accents. Grammar. Ellipses. History. Particles. Particles. Pleonasms. Pleonasms. Pronunciation Pronunciation. Syntax. Syntax. History. Any subdivision of the groups under countries has been strongly opposed as being troublesome to make, useless, and even confusing, or as being an unlawful mixture of classed and dictionary cataloguing. But suppose you have four or five hundred 4892 LI 7 • 98 STYLE: SETS, RARE BOOKS, ETC. titles uuder France. History. Will you break them up into groups with such head- ings as House of Bourbon, Revolution, Empire, Restoration, etc., with references and other devices for those works which treat of several periods, all of which it must be confessed is a little formidable at first glance, or will you leave them in one undivided mass, so that he who wants to find the history of the last half of tho 15th century must read through the 500 titles, perhaps, to find even one and certainly to find all? You would divide of course. It is true that grouping may mislead. The inquirer must still be careful to look in several places. The history of France during the ascendency of the House of Valois is to be found not merely under that heading but in the comprehensive histories of the country. The inquirer may be a little less likely to think of this because the titles of these two groups are separated from the many other titles which have nothing to do specially or generally with the House of Valois, but if he does think of it he is greatly assisted by such segregation. J. Etc. 259. In a supplement, catalogue the whole of a continued set, not merely the volumes received since the first catalogue. Ex. If v. 1-4 are in the catalogue and v. 5-10 are received later, enter all 10 v. in the supplement. It takes no more room, and it is useless to make the reader look in two places to ascertain how much of the work the library has. But this should not be done when it will take up much space, as would often be the case with periodicals, owing to details of change of name, number of volumes missing, etc. Nor should Contents be repeated ; it is enough to refer. 260. When there are many editions of a work under any subject-head- ing omit the titles and merely refer to the author-entry. Much space may thus be saved at little inconvenience to the reader. Ex. Gaul. C^SAR, C. J. Commentarii [B.C. 58-49 J. See Caesar, C. J. (pp.441, 442) ; here two lines do the work of forty. 261 . Rare books. American libraries and especially town libraries seldom have any books sufficiently rare to deserve great particularity of description. If for any reason it is thought necessary to give a minute account of a book or of a collection good models may be found in Tromel's Biblioth. ame"r., Lpz., 1861, 8°, Stevens's Historical nuggets, Lond., 1862, 2 v. 16°, Weller's Repertorium bibliographicum, Nordlingen, 1864, 8°, Harrisse's Biblioth. Amer. vetustissiina, N. Y., 1866, 8°, Tiele's Me'm. bibliog. sur les jonrnauxdes navig. n6erlandaises, Amst., 1867, 8°, and the titles of the rarer books in Sabin's Diet, of books rel. to America, N. Y., 1868, etc. For the convenience of those who have not these works at hand a few examples are given here. Leonardos de Utino or de Belluno. Fl. Sermones aurei de sanctis. [Colophon:] Ex- pliciut Sermones aurei | de sanctis per totu annum qa | copilauit magister Leonar | dus de Vtino sacre theologie | doctor. ..)... Adinstantiam&cojplacentiamagnifice coitatis | Vtiuensis. . . | . . . | M. cccc. xlvi ... | ... | . . . | . . . | . . . | [Colonise per Ulr. Zell,] M. cccc. Lxxiij. f°. Registrwm (47) pp., (4) pp. blank, Tabula (1) p., (244) 11. In 2 coll. of 36 lines. This copy has the leaves numbered in ms. and a Tabula prefixed to the 2d part by a contemporary hand. The work being very thick was probably in general bound in two narts and is rarely complete ; Santander describes only the 1st part, the due de la Valliere had only the 2d. The name of the printer, Zell, is found in only three or four of his numerous publications. This is shown to be his by the type, which is the same as that used in the Sermones of R. Caracciolus de Litio issued in the same year. The present work went through 10 editions in 8 years. According to Graesse it is APP. I: A. L. A. RULES. 99 probably the first book printed out of Italy which contains a line of Italian poetry, " Trenta foglie ha la rosa ", at the end of the 1st part. Bnmet V. 1022, Graesse vi. ii. 232, Hain no. 16128. (47) pp. means 47 unnumbered pages, II. means leaves. Italicizing the urn in Registrww* signifies that those letters are expressed in the caption by a contraction which the printer of the catalogue has no type for. Huon de Bordeaux, Les gestes et faictz | merueilleux du nojble Huon de Bor;deaulx Per de France, Due de Guyenne. Nouuellement redige en bon | Francoys: et Im- prime nouuellement a Paris pour Jean Bonfonds | . . . | . . . | [Woodcut] [Entfing~\ Lequel liure & | hystoire a este mis de rime en prose | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... lequel fut fait & parfait le vinte | neufiesme ioor de Janujer. Lan | mil. cccc. liiii | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... Imprime a Paris pour Jan | Bonfons ... | ... n. d. 4°. (8), 264 11. @ 40 lines. With 14 woodcuts in the text, and the printer's mark. On the eighth leaf is written " Jehan Moynard me possidet 1557," which is proba- bly not far from the date of publication. The 1st dated edition appeared in 1516. Brunet mentions two other editions before recording the present, one 1556, one undated. Sold, Essling 95 fr., Giraud 199 fr. APPENDIX I. CONDENSED RULES FOR AN AUTHOR AND TITLE CATALOG. PREPARED BY THE COOPERATION COMMITTEE OF THE AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSO- CIATION.' ENTRY. Books are to be entered under the : Surnames of authors when ascertained, the abbreviation "Anon." be- ing added to the titles of anonymous works. (la Initials of authors' names when these only are known, the last initial being put first. (Ib Pseudonyms of the writers when the real names are not ascertained, (le Names of editors of collections, each separate item to be at the same time sufficiently catalogd under its own heading, (Id Names of countries, cities, societies, or other bodies which are responsible for their publication. (le First icord (not an article or serial number) of the titles of periodicals and of anonymous books, the names of whose authors are not known.* And a motto or the designation of a series may be neglected when it begins a title, and the entry may be made under the first word of the real title following. (If Commentaries accompanying a text and translations are to be entered under the heading of the original work; but commentaries without the text under the name of the commentator. A book entitled " Com- mentary on ... " and containing the text should be put under both. (Ig 1 C. A. Cutter, S. H. Scudder, C. B. Tillinghast. Reprinted from the Library journal, 8 : 251-254. The rules of the Library Association of the United Kingdom were printed in the Library journal, G : 315-316. The Bodleian cataloging rules are given in the Library journal, 8: 298-301. 100 APP. I: A. L. A. RULES. The Bible, or any part of it (including the Apocrypha), in any lan- guage, is to be entered under the word Bible. (Ill The Talmud and Koran (and parts of them) are to be entered under those words; the sacred books of other religions are to be entered under the names by which they are generally known ; references to be given from the names of editors, translators, etc. (li The respondent or defender of an academical thesis is to be considered as the author, unless the work unequivocally appears to be the work of the praeses. (Ij Books having more than one author to be entered under the one first named in the title with a reference from each of the others. (Ik Reports of civil actions are to be entered under the name of the party to the snit which stands first on the title-page. Eeports of crown and criminal proceedings are to be entered under the name of the defend- ant. Admiralty proceedings relating to vessels are to be put under the name of the vessel. (11 Noblemen are to be entered under their titles, unless the family name is decidedly better known. (lin JEcclesiastical dignitaries, unless popes or sovereigns, are to be entered under their surnames. (In Sovereigns (other than Greek or Koman), ruling princes, Oriental writers, popes, friars, persons canonized, and all other persons known only by their first name, are to be entered under this first name. (lo Married women, and other persons who have changed their names, are to be put under the last well-known form. (Ip A pseudonym may be used instead of the surname (and only a reference to the pseudonym made under the surname) when an author is much more known by his false than by his real name. In case of doubt use the real name. (Iq A society is to be entered under the first word, not an article, of its cor- porate name, with references from any other name by which it is known, especially from the name of the place where its headquarters are established, if it is often called by that name. (lr •References. — When an author has been known by more than one name, references should be inserted from the name or names not to be used as headings to the one used. (la References are also to be made to the headings chosen: from the titles of all novels and plays and of poems likely to be asked for by their titles ; (It from other striking titles ; (lu from noticeable words in anonymous titles, especially from the names of subjects of anonymous biographies ; (Iv from the names of editors of periodicals, when the periodicals are gen- erally called by the editor's name ; (lw from the names of important translators (especially poetical transla- tors) and commentators j (lx A. L. A. EULES. 101 from the title of aii ecclesiastical dignitary, when that, and not the family name, is used in the book catalogd ; (ly and in other cases where a reference is needed to insure the ready finding of the book. (Iz HEADINGS. In the heading of titles, the names of authors are to be given in full, and in their vernacular form, except that the Latin form may be used when it is more generally known, the vernacular form being added in parentheses ; except, also, that sovereigns and popes may be given in the English form. (2a English and French surnames beginning with a prefix (except the French de and d') are to be recorded under the prefix ; in other lan- guages under the word following ; (2b English compound surnames are to be entered under the last part of the name ; foreign ones under the first part ; (2c Designations are to be added to distinguish writers of the same name from each other ; (2d Prefixes indicating the rank or profession of writers may be added in the heading, when they are part of the usual designation of the writers. (2e Names of places to be given in the English form. When both an Eng- lish and a vernacular form are used in English works, prefer the ver- nncular. (2f TITLES. The title is to be an exact transcript of the title-page, neither amended, translated, nor in any way altered, except that mottoes, titles of au- thors, repetitions, and matter of any kind not essential, are to be omitted. Where great accuracy is desirable, omissions are to be in- dicated by three dots (. . .). The titles of books especially valuable for antiquity or rarity may be given in full, with all practicable pre- cision. The phraseology and spelling, but not necessarily the punctu- ation, of the title are to be exactly copied. (3a Any additions needed to make the title clear are to be supplied and in- closed by brackets. (3b Initial capitals are to be given in English : (3c to proper names of persons and personifications, places, bodies, noted events, and periods (each separate word not an article, conjunction, or preposition, may be capitalized in these cases) ; (3d to adjectives and other derivatives from proper names when they have a direct reference to the person, place, etc., from which they are derived; (3e to tue first word of every sentence and of every quoted title ; (3f to titles of honor when staiiilin g instead of a proper name (e. g., the Earl of Derby, but John Stanley, earl of Derby) ; (3g 102 APP. I: »A. L. A. RULES. lu foreign languages, according to the local usage j (3k In doubtful cases capitals are to be avoided. (3i Foreign languages. — Titles in foreign characters may be transliterated. The languages in which a book is written are to be stated when there are several, and the fact is not apparent from the title. (3j [For the A. L. A. transliteration report, see pp. 108-114. IMPRINTS. After the title are to be given, in the following order, those in [ ] being optional : — the edition ; (4a the place of publication ; (4b [and the publisher's name] (these three in the language of the title) ; (4c the year as given on the title-page, but in Arabic figures ; (4d [the year of copyright or actual publication, it known to be different, in brackets, and preceded by c. or p. as the case may be] ; (4e the number of volumes, or of pages if there is only one volume ; (4f [the number of maps, portraits, or illustrations not included in the " text]; (4g and either the approximate size designated by letter (see Library journal, 3 : 19-20), or the exact size in centimeters ; (4h the name of the series to which the book belongs is to be given in pa- rentheses after the other imprint entries. (4i After the place of publication, the place of printing may be given if dif- ferent. This is desirable only in rare and old books. (4j The number of pages is to be indicated by giving the last number of each paging, connecting the numbers by the sign + ; the addition of unpaged matter may be shown by a +, or the number of pages ascer- tained by counting may be given in brackets. When there are more than three pagings, it is better to add them together and give the sum in brackets. These imprint entries are to give the facts, whether ascertained from the book or from other sources ; those which are usually taken from the title (edition, place, publisher's name, and series) should be in the language of the title, corrections and additions being inclosed in brackets. It is better to give the words, " maps," " portraits," etc., and the abbreviations for "volumes" and "pages," in English. (4k CONTENTS, NOTES. Notes (in English) and contents of volumes are to be given when nec- essary to properly describe the works. Both notes and lists of con- tents to be in a smaller type. (oa MISCELLANEOUS. A single dash or indent indicates the omission of the preceding head- ing; a subsequent dash or indent indicates the omission of a Sub- ordinate heading, or of a title. (6a L. A. U. K. RULES. 103 A dash connecting numbers signifies to and including ; following a num- ber it signifies continuation. (6b A ? following a word or entry signifies probably. (60 Brackets inclose words added to titles or imprints or changed in form. (6d Arabic figures are to be used rather than Roman; but small capitals may be used after the names of sovereigns, princes, and popes. (6e A list of abbreviations to be used was given in the Library journal, 3: 16-20. (6f ARRANGEMENT. The surname when used alone precedes the same name used with fore- names ; where the initials only of the forenames are given, they are to precede fully written forenames beginning with the same initials (e. g.j Brown ; Brown, J.; Brown, J. L. ; Brown, James). (7a The prefixes M and Me, S., St., Ste., Messrs., Mr., and Mrs., are to be arranged as if written in full,, Mac, Sanctus, Saint, Sainte, Messieurs, Mister, and Mistress. (7b The works of an author are to be arranged in the following order : — 1. Collected works. (7c 2. Partial collections. (7d 3. Single works, alphabetically by the first word of the title. (7e The order of alphabet! ng is to be that of the English alphabet. (7f The German ae, oe, ue, are always to be written a, 6, ii, and arranged as a, o, u. (7g Names of persons are to precede similar names of places, which in turn precede similar first words of titles. (7h THE RULES OF THE ENGLISH LIBRARY ASSOCIATION. The cataloguing rules of the Library Association of the United King- dom, as revised in 1883, and published in the Library Chronicle of Feb- ruary, 1885, differ from the A. L. A. rules in the following points : 1. The order of the imprint is to be: edition, number of volumes, if only one volume, the number of pages, the number of separate illustra- tions, maps, or portraits, the size, the place of publication, the place of printing when different from that of publication, the publisher's name, and the year. 2. All anonymous works to have the abbreviation "Anon." added. 3. Entry under the chief subject-word of the titles of anonymous books, with a cross-reference, where advisable, under any other notice, able word. 4. Service and Prayer books used by any religious community are to be placed under the head of Liturgies, with a subhead of the religious community. 5. Names of translators, commentators, editors, and preface writers, if they do not occur in the title-page, may be added within square brackets, a cross-reference being made in each case. 104 APP. I: BODLEIAX RULES. 6. It should be noticed that sometimes the respondent and defender of a thesis are joint authors. 7. All persons generally known by a forename are to be so entered, the English form being used in the case of sovereigns, popes, ruling princes, Oriental writers, friars, and persons canonized. [This is like the A. L. A., but differently expressed.] 8. [References are required to be always made to the first word under which a society is entered] from the name of the place where its head- quarters are established. 9. Individual works to be arranged under an author in alphabetical order of titles, under the first word, not an article or a preposition having the meaning of " concerning." 10. The German a, 6, ii, are to be arranged as if written out in full — ae, oe, ue. THE BODLEIAN LIBRARY RULES. The Bodleian rules differ from the A/L. A. in the following points*: I. All omissions to be indicated by a group of three dots (...)• The name of the author or editor, if it occur on the title-page in the same form as in the heading, may be omitted if no ambiguity be occasioned thereby. 3. Does not capitalize titles of honor when standing instead of a proper name. 6. Puts number of volumes before place of publication. Does not give number of pages, maps, etc. In the case of books of the 15th and 16th centuries or of special value or rarity, the names of the publisher and printer are to be added after the place. Books are to be entered: 10. Under the surnames of authors, when stated on the title-page or otherw.se certainly known, followed by the forename and other neces- sary prefixes in round brackets. II. When only the initials or pseudonym of an author occur in the book, it is to be regarded for the purpose of headings as anonymous ; and a cross-reference is to be made from the initials or pseudonym to the first heading, the last initial being placed first, followed by the others in round brackets. 12. Under the pseudonyms of the writers, unless the book be already entered under two headings, in which case a cross-reference is to be made from the pseudonym to the first heading. 13. Under the names of editors of collections, and under the catch- titles of such collections; the parts are to be at the same time suffi- ciently catalogued under their own headings. 15. Under the chief word or words of the titles of periodicals. 16. Under the first striking word or words of the titles of anonymous * It will be seen iu several cases that, unlike the A. L. A, rules, they are designed for a library that has no subject catalogue. BODLEIAN EULES. 105 works, with a cross-reference, where advisable, from any other notice- able word or catch-title. If the name of a writer occur in a work but not on the title-page, the work is also to be regarded for the purpose of headings as anonymous. 17. Commentaries with the text, editions of the text, and translations are to be entered (1) under the heading of the original work, and (2) under the name of the commentator, editor, or translator; commentaries without the text are to be entered under the same two headings, the second being placed first. 18. Editions of the entire Bible, with or without the Apocrypha, are to be entered under the word Bible: editions of parts of the Bible comprising more than one book under the words Testament (Old), Apoc- rypha, Testament (New], or lesser divisions such as Pentateuch, Histori- cal books, Hagiographa, Prophets, Gospels, Paul the apostle, Epistles (General). 21. Service and prayer books of the Church of England are to be entered under the names by which they are commonly known, such as Prayer (Book of Common), Baptism (Order of), Communion (Holy), etc. : those of the Church of Rome in like manner under Missal, Breviary, Hours, etc., with a subheading of the use. Service-books of other re- ligious communities are to be entered under the head of Liturgies, with a subheading of the religious community. 22. Separate musical compositions, accompanied by words, are to be entered under the names of the authors and translators of the words (unless these are taken from the Bible or a public service-book) as well as under those of the authors and editors of the music. 24. In the case of an academical thesis the praeses is to be considered as the author, unless the work unequivocally appears to be the work of the respondent or defender. 26. Catalogues are to be entered under the name of the compiler; also, as circumstances require, under the names of one or more of the institutions or persons now or formerly owning the collection, and, where desirable, under the name of the collection itself. 32. English and French surnames beginning with a prefix or prefixes are to be recorded under the first prefix, and surnames in other lan- guages under the word following the last prefix — except that French names beginning with de or d' are to'be entered under the word follow- ing de or d\ 33. English compound surnames, not connected by an hyphen, are to be entered under the last part of the names [A. L. A. — under first part] : foreign ones, with or without hyphens, under the entire compound name, cross-references being given in all instances. 35. A society is to be entered under the leading word or words of its corporate name. 37. Dashes or asterisks in names and titles are to precede letters of the alphabet. 106 APP. I: BODLEIAN RULES. 39. The works of an author, and other books capable of similar treat- ment, are to be arranged in the following order, an index or conspectus of the entire article being prefixed when expedient: (1) General cross-references. (2) Collections of all the works of the author in the original language, whether including or excluding fragments, and whether with or without translations or commentaries. (a) Dated editions in chronological order. (6) Editions without date and without conjecturally supplied date ; but if known to be of the 15th century they are to precede the dated editions. But new editions of a work by the same editor are to succeed the first entry of the edition. (3) Translations without the text, of collected works, in alphabetical order of languages, cross-references being inserted in this series to all editions which contain the original text as well as a translation. Poly- glot editions are to precede all others. (4) Commentaries without the text, on collected works, in chronological order. Scholia are to precede all other commentaries. (5) Selections from collected works. (6) Collections of two or more works of the author, in alphabetical order of the general title of the collection ; or, if there be none, of the first work of the collection. In special cases entries which would in strictness fall under this division may be placed in the succeeding para- graph, with a cross-reference. (7) Separate works, or entire parts of a separate work, in chronologi- cal order of the first issues of the works ; in any difficult cases an alpha- betical or other special arrrangement is to be made. (8) Fragments of the author ; but when a work exists only in frag- ments it may be entered under preceding paragraphs. (9) (a) ^exicons, (&) Indexes and concordances. (10) Dissertations, treatises, imitations, etc., which do not fall under preceding heads, in chronological order. (11) Biographies. (12) Bibliographies. N. B. The principles of arrangement in the preceding paragraphs are to be used •where applicable, in other articles. 40. Biographies are to be entered under the subjects of them, as well as under the writers. 41. The order of alphabetization is to be that of the English alphabet, except that, in general, I and U before a vowel are to be arrranged as J and V, and J and V before a consonant as I and U, with such cross- references as may be necessary. 42. Headings composed of more than one separate word are not to be regarded for purposes of arrangement as a single word. MR. DEWEY'S RULES. 107 45. The German a, o, ii are to be arranged as if written out in full, ae, oe, ue. 46. Arabic figures are to used rather than Roman ; but Roman figures may be used after the names of ruling princes and popes, or to desig- nate the number of a volume or chapter when followed by a page [or division] number in Arabic figures. 51). Word-books, grammars, and alphabets are to be entered under the names of the languages to which they relate, as well as under the names of their compilers and editors — except that, where a word-book relates to two languages, or dialects, of which one is modern literary English, no separate entry needs be made in respect of the latter. 51. Long and important articles are to have an index prefixed, and subheadings may be added to the main heading iu the same line, for convenience of reference. 52. Gives a list of 28 abbreviations allowable iu ordinary entries. 53. The general rule regulating the use of brackets is that round brackets include notes derived from the work itself, while square brack- ets include notes of which the matter or form is independent of the work. 54. Single sermons are to have a note of the text added. MR. DEWEY'S RULES FOR A CARD CATALOGUE. Mr. Dewey's Rules for a card catalogue, printed in No. 2 of the Li- brary notes, pp. 111-124, and reprinted as Columbia catalog rules, Bos- ton, 1888, and again as Library School rules, Boston, 1889, "except for the enlargements, differ from the A. L. A. rules," he says, " only in the following points : We enter always under real name, omitting the exception that some books may go under pseudonyms. [Not Eliot, G., but Lewes or Cross.] (le We follow the rule recommended as. best in Cutter's rules No. 40, put- ting under the name of the place local and municipal societies, though the corporate name may not begin with that word. (Is We give cities in their vernacular form instead of in English. [Wieu, not Vienna.] (2f We do not capitalize common nouns in German, but follow the rule of the Library of Congress. [Wahrheit und dichtung.] (5in We give place and date at the end of the imprint entries instead of after edition, thus following the L. A. U. K. and Bodleian rules, the A. L. A. minority report, and the Library of Congress in putting those most i?nportant items in the most prominent place, instead of burying them back of minor items. We give edition iu English rather than in the language of the title, [Ed. 2, not 2e Aufl.] (4c We use Arabic figures for all numerals, unless Roman are used on the title after names of rulers and popes." [Charles 1, Leo 13.] (9b 108 A. L. A. TRANSLITERATION REPORT. APPENDIX H. REPORT OF THE TRANSLITERATION COMMITTEE. [See $ 36. This Report was made to the American Library Association in 1885, and printed in the Proceedings of the Lake George Conference, and in the Library journal, 10: 302-8.] In determining the principles of transliteration it must be remembered that a cat- alogue is not a learned treatise intended for special scholars, and bound to an erudite consistency, at whatever cost of convenience. It is simply a key to open the doors of knowledge to a partly ignorant and partly learned public, and it is very important that such a key should turn easily. A good catalogue, therefore, will be a compro- mise between the claims of learning and logic on the one hand, and of ignorance, error, and custom on the other. Speakiug generally, that form of name must be chosen with which people now are, and in Ihe future will be, most familiar. This ref- erence to the future is important. The catalogue must not be in advance of its age ; but, on the other hand, it will not be well that it should be behind the next genera- tion. If, therefore, there is an evident current of progress in any direction the makers of the catalogue will do well to be a little before the present practice, in the hope that the world will soon catch up with them, not to pass them before the catalogue itself has been superseded by another. The larger the catalogue, therefore, and the less likely to be soon reprinted, the more may it venture to be ahead of the times. Never- theless the maker will do well to remember that the future is very uncertain. One evident current of progress there is, — in favor of adopting the continental value of thu vowels, representing the ou sound, for instance, not by ou nor by oo (as does Dr. Thomas), but by u; writing, therefore, Butan, not Boutan,nor Bootan, Turgenef and not Tourgneneff ; using also a and not ah for the sound of a in father, papa (I speak as a New Euglander) ; using the i for the English e sound ; and giving what are unfortu- nately called the corresponding short sounds by doubling the following consonant; thus Nana would be spelt with one n, but Nanny with two. This tendency, which has been gathering strength for some time, has at last received the sanction of an in- fluential body, the Royal Geographical Society, and can be followed with safety. The following notes are taken mostly from Mr. Heilprin's articles in the Nation : 1. For ancient Greek names use the Latin forms, e. g., Homerus not Homeros, Plato not Platon, Philippus not Philippos. But where two forms are in common use choose that which is nearest the Greek. 2. For Egyptian names known to us through the Greek, both the Greek and the Egyptian form (as Cheops and Shufu) should be given, with a reference from the one which is not chosen for the main entry. 3. Biblical names are to be written as we find them in the English Bible, and the names of post-Biblical Jews, if derived from the Scriptures, should retain their An- glicized form. On the other hand, a strict transliteration is demanded of rabbinical and other more or less pure Hebrew names which are not taken from Scriptures, and therefore have no popular English forms, to which, again, there is an exception it) the case of a few celebrated Jewish authors, as Maimonides, where an un-Hebrew form has been fully adopted in English literature. East Indian names have such long accepted forms that it might well be doubted whether it will do to use any others. Cashmere, Mooltan, Jellaleddin, Punjaub, have taken their places in literature and in the popular mind. Nevertheless, as the better sys- tem which writes Kashmir, Multan, Jalal ud Din, Panjab, is now adopted in most his- tories, in all official documents, among others in Hunter's great statistical dictionary of Bengal, it is evident that it is the coming method, and, in accordance with the A. L. A. TRANSLITERATION REPORT. 109 principles already laid down, we are inclined to recommend this spelling rather than the clumsy English fashion of the last generation. All other Asiatic and African names should be transliterated according to the rules of the Royal Geographical Society, which we quote here from their Proceedings for August, 1685 (pp. 535, 536). The Council of the Royal Geographical Society have adopted the following rules for such geographical names as are not, in the countries to which they belong, written in the Roman character. These rules are identical with those adopted for the Ad- miralty charts, and will henceforth be used in all publications of the society: — 1. No change will.be made in the orthography of foreign names in countries which use Roman letters: thus, Spanish, Portuguese, Dutch, etc., names will be spelt as by the respective nations. 2. Neither will any change be made in the spelling of such names in languages which are not written in Roman character as have become by long usage familiar to English readers: thus, Calcutta, Cntch, Celebes, Mecca, etc., will be retained in their present form. 3. The true sound of the word, as locally pronounced, will be taken as the basis of the spelling. 4. An approximation, however, to the sound is alone aimed at. A system which would attempt to represent the more delicate inflections of sound and accent would be so complicated as only to defeat itself. 5. The broad features of the system are, that vowels are pronounced as in Italian and consonants as in English. 6. One accent only is used — the acute — to denote the syllable on which stress is laid. 7. Every letter is pronounced. When two vowels come together each one is sounded, though the result, when spoken quickly, is sometimes scarcely to be distinguished from a single sound, as in ai, au, ei. 8. Indian names are accepted as spelt in Hunter's Gazetteer. The amplification of the rules is given below : Letters. Pronunciation and re- marks. Examples. Letters. Pronunciation and re- marks. Examples. Si oh a as in father Java, liaiiaiia. ei is the sound of the two Beirut, BeiliiL Q eh e as in benefit Tel el-Kebir,Ole- Italian vowels, but is leh.Tezo, Med- frequently slurred ina, Levuka, over, when it is scarce- Peru. ly to be distinguished i English e ; i as is ra- from ey in the English vine ; the sound of ee they. iii beet. b English b. Thus, not Feejee, c is always soft, but is so Celebes. but Fiji, Hindi. nearly the sound of « o o as in itiote Tokio. that it should l>e sel- u long u, as in flute ; the dom used. (If Celebes sound of oo in 6oot. were not already rec- Thus, not Zooloo, ognized it would be but, Zulu, Sumatra. written Selebes.) All vowelsare shortened Tarr a, Tanna, ch is always soft as in Chingchin. in sound by doubling Mecca, Jidda, church. the following conso- Bonny. -d English d. nant. f English /. ph should Doubling of a vowel is Nuulua, Oosima. not be used for the only necessary where sound of /. there is a distinct rep- Thus, not Haiphong etition of the single but Haifong, Nafa. sound. g is always hard. (Soft g Galapagos. is given by j.) ai English i as in ice Shanghai. h is always pronounced au ow as in how. when inserted. Thus uotfoochow. but Fuchau. i English j. Dj should Japan,,Jinchuen ao is slightly different from Macao. 1 never be put for this above. sound. 110 APP. II: A. L. A. TRANSLITERATION REPORT. Letters. Pronunciation and re- marks. Examples. Letters. Pronunciation and re- marks. Examples. k kh English k. It should always be put for the hard c. Thus, not Corea, but the Oriental guttural . . Korea. Khan. r s t V w ]• as in English. Saw&kin. gt 1 m n ng is another guttural, as in the Turkish. >as in English. has two separate sounds, the one hard as in the English word finger, the other as in singer. As these two sounds Dagh, Ghazi. X .V z is always a consonant, as in yard, and there- fore should never be used as a terminal, i ore being substituted. Thus, not Hikind&ny bat not Kwaly,but English z ... Mikindani. Kwale. Zulu P q are rarely employed in the same locality, no attempt is made to distinguish between them, as in English, should never be em- ployed ; qu is given as kw. Kwangtung. Accents should not gen- erally be used, but when there is a very decided emphatic syl- lable or stress, which affects the sound of the word, it should be marked by an acute accent. f TongaUbu, Gala- . pagos, Paldwan, Sarawak. A few points need to be emphasized. Of course the consonantal sound in itch should never be expressed in transliteration by the Polish cz, nor by the German tsch. Teh has been much used for this sound ; but the t is hardly necessary if, as the Geo- graphical Society recommend, ch is always used with this sound only and never with the sound sh. Of course there is no reason why ch should be used in foreign names with the sound sh any more than j with the sound zh. All that was needed to pre- vent ambiguity was tor some competent authority to make a rule ; and these rules of the Geographical Society will no doubt soon be copied into all manuals and fol- lowed by the majority. In this connection we express our regret that a new edition of Dr. Thomas's excellent Dictionary of Biography continues to give his support to what we believe is an obsolescent system of transliteration. Nor should the consonantal sound in judge be rendered by the English dg, nor the French dj, nor the German dsch, but byj alone. Likewise the consonantal sound in she is not to be written after the French style, ch, or as the Germans do, sch. The sound which the French transliterate by,/ we must express by zh (e.g., Nizhni Nov- gorod). Tz is best to use in Semitic and Slavic names, and ts in Japanese and Chi- nese. For the Semitic " yod" y is the proper equivalent, and not the German j. But after a consonant in the same syllable it is usual to change the y to i (Biela not Byela), and in Russian names at, ei, oi, ui are used instead of ay, ey, oy, uy ( Alexei not Alexey). After i the y is dropped (Dobni not Dobniy). W is to be used rather than i in Arabic names (e. g., Moawiyah). But the Russian, Serb, Bulgarian, and Wallach contain no such sound or letter as w, and we must write Paskevitch, Vasili, not as do the Ger- mans, Paskewitch, Wasili. In the last syllable of names of places (Azov, Kiev) ev and ov are to be used, because the Russians used the corresponding letter, though they pronounce ef and of (in the nominative cases). But in the last syllable of fam- ily names, similarly pronounced, of and ef may be used, because the Russians sign their names off and eff when using Roman characters. The last/, which they use, may be omitted as being plainly not required to express the sound, and not corre- sponding to the Russian character. Kh represents the full guttural, which the Ger- mans make ch and the Spanish j in Slavic and Oriental names. H answers to the softer guttural as well as to the Hebrew he. K answers to the Semitic Kaph and Koph. The use of ei for the sound of a in fate, ea in great, oi in trait, is not altogether satisfactory. It is not easy to see why e was not used to represent this sound, and A. L. A. TRANSLITERATION REPORT 111 the short c, like the short a, i, o, and «, indicated by doubling tho following con- sonant, as Yeddo, Meddina. The general rule, then, is to use the consonants with their English value, the vowels with their continental, or, to speak more exactly, their German and Italian value, for the French value of u should never be used, and the short French a requires of us a doubled consonant after it. Their ou and our oo is quite unnecessary to express the sound of the last syllable of Timbuctu or Khartum. C: A. CUTTER. C. B. TlLLINGHAST. W: C. LANE. MICHAEL HEILPRIN. Professor Toy, of Harvard University, furnished to the committee a transliteration table for Semitic languages, Professor Lanman, of the same University, one for San- skrit, and Mr. Heilprin, of the committee, one for Russian. Professor LANMAN remarked on his table : 1. It will be observed that each of the five rows numbered 1 to 5 consists of five letters; the second and fourth in each, i. e., the aspirates, are often written, especially in older works, thus, k', g', c',/, t', d', I', d',p', I1; that is, thorough breathing takes the place of the h. 2. Write long vowels with a macron, thus, a, I, u, f, and not with a circumflex. 3. Wherever you find the combination ri, with a dot under the r, reduce it to sim- ple r, since it is a simple unitary sound. 4. The palatals (row 2) are often written by means of the gutturals and an accent: thus, we find k' k'h g' g'Ji; for c ch j jh and in some German books c (which has the sound of ch in church) is written tsch, and j (=j iujudye) in like manner dsch. Further, c and ch are written in some English works as ch and cch, a useless waste of labor. 5. When the third palatal is written by t), it is common among the Germans to write the first semi-vowel by j. The last semi-vowel is often written w (instead of t>). 6. The transliteration of the first two sibilants is very fluctuating. My f, is written § by Monier Williams in his dictionary. The second sibilant is often written sh, sometimes #, by me as s, like the other linguals. 7. Finally an s at the end of a Sanskrit word is converted into an aspiration called visarga, and written thus : , and in transliteration is written in this manner, h. The nasality of a vowel is marked by h or m which appears in the Sanskrit as a dot above the body of the consonant. For a brief and lucid discussion of these matters and a defense of the system of Professor Whitney, of Yale, which is followed in his grammar and in Lanman's Reader, see The Proceedings of the American Oriental Society, October, 1880, p. xvii. 112 APP. II: SANSKRIT TRANSLITERATION REPORT. T f 3 r t ssft. T f 1 1 /vvivtt- it A L tL Si &. zr y "± TL - IT Z •U dt, rn -$ P u; P or. SEMITIC TRANSLITERATION. 113 ¥* ) t t" ($. n ., tUCUAi- *. 0 * ta ^ m t- * > ^ y »• o y 4 c/ ^pj) y y» t J ^ ^ ^ i 0 ?(*)) ^ i % s n J$4 f •J, Sl+t ft fa bl, J 6///,7 B *,',-*.* Jl f (tiff,